roflcopter wrote:
farside22 wrote:dcorbe wrote:
You're still reaching. At one point in time you liked this. You went as far as to say I had a good point and now you're going back on your word. Which is it? Either I'm contributing usefully or I'm not. It can't be one or the other when it suits your whims.
You seem to have a personal problem with me and it's effecting your judgement.
I thought you had a point, but I did a read through again and felt differently. It happens to everyone.
On a side note I have no issue with you or problem. I don't have tunnel vision in any game I've played whether scum or town. I don't know why but some of what you say just feels off to me.
Iceman. I try and respond at least once a day. I don't think asking me to come in every time to respond to a question is fair. I'm doing the best I can with my once a day comments and if I have time I try and say more.
I will go back and do a reread I just don't have time today. Expect more tomorrow.
"just felt off" is still not a valid reason to suspect somebody, and if you can't explain what about it made it feel off to you i certainly don't see why anyone else would believe you have a legitimate case against him let alone vote for him with you.
its nothing personal when i say that farside needs to be lynched immediately.
While Farside has been acting scummy, an immediate lynch is a suggestion I think a scum player rushing into the night would say.
FoS: Roflcopter
Korts wrote:You're taking this the wrong way again, rofl. I didn't say your contribution was low, I wanted to say that consecutively short replies may cause low contribution. I may have been unclear, though, sorry.
Korts downgraded his attack on Roflcopter and backtracked. Let’s take a look back at what he said a few posts ago:
Korts wrote:
One-liners aren't all that scummy by themselves (hence weak scumtells), but consecutively short replies
mean low contribution
, which doesn't really help.
Korts wrote:Okay, since a simple readthrough didn't give me anything new, I'm going to do a PBPA on the two leading wagons. So farside and dcorbe, beware. I'll have time for one tomorrow, probably. The other, maybe Sunday, but more likely Monday.
Making a PBPA on the two leading wagons doesn’t make much sense to me. Points have already been brought up on them, so I don’t see how this could have helped much. It seems like Korts is again just making a PBPA for the sake of making a PBPA.
Rishi wrote:Hey. I've caught up. A whole lot of pointing at farside and her lynch seems inevitable. I think Korts posted a great PBPA on farside, though I'm unsure about one thing. He says that the weak scumtells add up to a lynch, and yet he doesn't vote for her? Why is he afraid to drop the hammer?
This is a good point.
Rishi wrote:I don't find this back-and-forth between dcorbe and icemanE productive at all. There seems to be very little substance to their arguments.
Agreed.
Rishi wrote:icemanE wrote:
farside - ??? (perhaps Rishi for lurking and almost no contribution thus far)
WTF?
You really think I'm worse than Mr. Blonde, Celebloki or Surye in terms of lack of contribution?
Are you even reading the thread? Maybe you should post less and actually pay attention.
While the content in this post is true, it’s “WTF?” tone is negative and seems to be an overreaction. The fact that it’s in response to Iceman makes me think that he is not Rishi’s buddy.
muffinhead wrote:Ok once again ive had a look over the game escpically the farside wagon which started from this comment below
farside22 wrote:dcorbe wrote:Not having an avatar is a scum tell now?
I guess all the newbies here are in bad shape then!
@Mr. Blonde: curious why me not voting deserves scrutiny.
Someone needs to join a newbie game me thinks.
unvote:
vote: dcorbe
Now I understand how this caused a wagon due to the fact that farsides vote was based on the fact he doesnt doesnt have an aviatar which has nothing to do with this game.
then people decide they vote him for a wagon
icemanE wrote:
rofl wrote:
dcorbe wagon is being ridden by scum, methinks
As such,
unvote, vote: farside
.
Mr. Blonde wrote:Oh well... let's put some bandwagon moving:
unvote
vote farside22
Grimmy wrote:its seven to lynch.
farside has four votes so far.
My vote is safe, even if the deadline hits, because the four votes put her over the top in case of a deadline.
Vote: Farside
Grimmy
see ya monday
Now surly we cant lynch farside based on that one scummy post. Yet i see posts like this
roflcopter wrote:thats pretty fatalistic. i still think farside's the right play.
@rofl- do you want farside lynched based on that one post? If not then plz explain.
Your misrepresenting the Farside wagon here, it wasn’t originally intended as a lynch just a wagon for pressure. Mr. Blonde stated that he wanted the bandwagon moving, not that he wanted a lynch. And, Grimmy made sure that his vote wouldn’t bring Farside to a lynch.
By the time it was widely agreed that Farside was a good lynch, there was more than just 1 reason.
muffinhead wrote:Ok im back now with plenty of time. Im currently happy with a blond lynch as he isnt a big loss.
vote mr blond
Justifying a lynch with "he isn't a big loss" is scummy. You should want to lynch him because you think he's scum not because he isn't a big loss. Actually this is quite weird, because it seems like your pre-justifying a mislynch.
FoS: muffinhead
muffinhead wrote:To sum it up orginally it was a pressure vote but if he doesnt respond in 48 hours then im happy to lynch him. That is why I responded rishi and if you had a look then I said no one should put the final vote on him untill he responds.
I highly doubt that was a pressure vote since in the quote above the one above this text you included the phrase I’m currently happy with a blond lynch. It seems that vote was intended for a lynch.
FoS: Muffinhead
Now that my reread analysis is done, I have my scum list put together.
1) Tekkactus- Roflcopter pointed out that he could have been distancing from Rishi and I've seen what I think is Rishi coaching Tekkactus. I've already pointed out what I find suspicious about him today.
2) Korts/Muffinhead- Korts seemed to only "scumhunt" in order to look like he was scum hunting. Muffinhead misrepresented some aspects of the early farside wagon and had an unusual position on the Mr. Blonde wagon.
3) Farside- for her early day 1 actions. I don't think she played scummily after that though.
4) Rofl- He seemed to eager and hasty when it came to the Farside wagon.
