Sorry, post 57 was sarcastic as fuck. I should have put something to denote that.In post 164, Wondertank wrote:I point out in 53 that this is a town trait for him. I also state that I am townreading him when he asks if it should be worth clearing them of in 57. Instead of being introduced new information and re-asses, like how town would because town wants to be right, he decides to keep the read.
I dismissed it because it felt like a waste of time. The thought process behind those questions is so self-evident that I honestly could not figure out why you were asking me about it. Either I answer honestly and you continue to nit-pick at my answers until you can spin any inconsistency as scummy or I don't answer and you can spin that as scummy. Or maybe not. Maybe you honestly can't figure out why I'm asking a question to find out knowledge. In which case, I don't know how to explain basic fact-finding to you.For 1, I don't believe there was any actual purpose behind the questioning in 27. I believe he was just firing off questions for the sake of it. Instead of answering my honestly by explaining the thought process of those questions, he just dismisses it with 123.
You seem to have a strong view of what is perfect town play and you seem willing to attack any behavior that deviates from it. Which is either scummy or you don't understand human nature.
BTW, add me to the list of people that can read panzerjager's behavior as not being scum-indicative.