| Target | Wagon |
|---|---|
Alisae (4) | humaneatingmonkey (1559), votato (1560), NorwegianboyEE (1583), Looker (1732) |
NorwegianboyEE (3) | Elements (1717), Alisae (1720), Firebringer (1721) |
Not Voting (3) | Deimos27, Green Crayons, Isis |
yesIn post 1749, humaneatingmonkey wrote:is e?In post 1745, Firebringer wrote:he is talking about his town game dude.In post 1744, humaneatingmonkey wrote:like what you're doing now?In post 1741, Alisae wrote:controlling the narative and driving the agenda
the game im refering to in that post is high noon in which we were both scumIn post 1745, Firebringer wrote:he is talking about his town game dude.In post 1744, humaneatingmonkey wrote:like what you're doing now?In post 1741, Alisae wrote:controlling the narative and driving the agenda
it seemed to me like they were reminiscing about the time they were scum together, and that looker remembered alisae as aggressive, and alisae explained why e is aggressiveIn post 1752, Firebringer wrote:yesIn post 1749, humaneatingmonkey wrote:is e?In post 1745, Firebringer wrote:he is talking about his town game dude.In post 1744, humaneatingmonkey wrote:like what you're doing now?In post 1741, Alisae wrote:controlling the narative and driving the agenda
ohh i thought u were talking about town game u were both inIn post 1753, Alisae wrote:the game im refering to in that post is high noon in which we were both scumIn post 1745, Firebringer wrote:he is talking about his town game dude.In post 1744, humaneatingmonkey wrote:like what you're doing now?In post 1741, Alisae wrote:controlling the narative and driving the agenda
I'm not though.In post 1744, humaneatingmonkey wrote:like what you're doing now?In post 1741, Alisae wrote:controlling the narative and driving the agenda
you're not gonna give it. i'm going to earn it.In post 1757, Looker wrote:asking for trust in mafia is a doozy
dudeIn post 1757, Looker wrote:this is giving me anxiety ill be back. asking for trust in mafia is a doozy lol
I mean if ur scum here, its 100% the play to make me look like a fucking idiot who doesn't know how to play mafia.In post 1758, humaneatingmonkey wrote:AMA on anyone that's not Alisae because I don't want to deal with her "you're not pushing a read, you're pushing a fact" horse dung anymore.
You've already demonstrated that you have. Your case against me was so colored with bad faith and misrepresentation that you've gave me nothing to doubt my scumread on you.In post 1759, Alisae wrote:I'm not though.
You had the hammer on every lynch here. You were leading NorwEE's lynch before I brought it back to Cycle Men. You're not playing passively here, and if you say that you are, there's evidence against it. More proof that this is bullshit.In post 1759, Alisae wrote: The difference between this game and High Noon (a game you didn't even read)
is that in High Noon, I played a game where I took the initiative to do everything and I led mostly every lynch.
in this game, before your vote on Cycle Men, I was playing a very reactionary game that I wasn't really invested in.
And you reacted with a hammer on someone you know IS town, just so you can get a reaction on potential scum? WHEN your scumread is Please. There's no way that's gonna come from town.In post 1759, Alisae wrote:I was caught off guard by Cycle Men's flip and reacted to it, which is not something I did in High Noon after mislynching, going into night, and killing the other person who scumread me and who I tried to frame as scummy.
Your word against the flip, Alisae.In post 1759, Alisae wrote:As scum with Cycle Men, I don't get myself in that situation that happened on D1. For starters, my entire interaction where I call Cycle Men "scum or bad" and am flip flopping on what to decide my read on him as doesn't happen.
I've already explained why Cycle Men had all the scum motivation to not do the NorwEE lynch, and ACTUALLY caught him because of it.In post 1759, Alisae wrote:Cycle Men doesn't need to align himself with Norwee there, he doesn't need to push me, and I certainly don't react to him the way I did when he pushes that theory and agrees with Norwee. And the way I reacted to Cycle Men was what you could call surprised. Mostly because I was shocked that he was pushing a really absurd theory.
In post 869, humaneatingmonkey wrote: Can I interest you in an Elements wagon instead?
HA! You have the solid guts to say this. If you really believe that this is the pro-town move to do, you would have applied this on your logic when hammering ABR and Cycle Men.In post 1767, Alisae wrote:Also no one should hammer me w/o claiming intent, because if it so comes to that, I want to get one last post out with my thoughts before hammer.
You read one line and ignored the entire case completely.In post 1766, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Your case against me was so colored with bad faith and misrepresentation that you've gave me nothing to doubt my scumread on you.
OhIn post 1769, Elements wrote:In post 869, humaneatingmonkey wrote: Can I interest you in an Elements wagon instead?
FirebringerIn post 1770, humaneatingmonkey wrote:HA! You have the solid guts to say this. If you really believe that this is the pro-town move to do, you would have applied this on your logic when hammering ABR and Cycle Men.In post 1767, Alisae wrote:Also no one should hammer me w/o claiming intent, because if it so comes to that, I want to get one last post out with my thoughts before hammer.