Mushroom Kingdom Mafia (Game over!)

Lawrencelot · Post Post #1625 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2008 11:46 am

As mr. incrediball is forced to move towards the chopping block, Peach hopes they will be as lucky as they were yesterday. Without any resistance, mr. incrediball is killed by the angry mob of Toads who scream for his death. He didn´t tell them who he was, but the town would find out soon. After his death, the curious Toads pulled of his mask... the unique nose and mustache said enough.

mr. incrediball,

Wario (WarioWare, Inc.)

, lynched Day 2

It is now Night 2. You got until July 30 to send in night actions and discuss the game if you´re allowed to.

Lawrencelot · Post Post #1626 (ISO) » Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:02 am

ting =) replaces andersonw overnight

Lawrencelot · Post Post #1627 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:34 am

One of Bowser's minions bashes into the throne room of Bowser's Castle. "Sir Bowser, sir Bowser!" he screams. "I take it you have good news for me?" says Bowser. "We have kidnapped the Princess, sir, as you requested!" A growling laughter escapes Bowser, and the whole castle trembles. "Prepare the wedding! When this day ends, the Princess shall be mine, and so will the Mushroom Kingdom!"

The rumours were spread into the town where the Toads live. "We have to find out who's Bowser!" says a Toad. "We're still with 23 Toads here, so he has to be among us." "Correction," says another Toad, "we're only with 22." That's right, they found out that armlx was missing. When they searched his body, it turns out that he was the son of Bowser, also known as Bowser Jr. or Baby Bowser. But there was no time to rejoice, now is the time to find out who kidnapped their beloved Princess.

The Princess has been captured!
armlx,

Baby Bowser (Bowser's Army)

, killed Night 2

It is now Day 3. With 21 alive it takes 11 real votes for a lynch. A reminder of rule 25: "Bowser may try to kidnap princess Peach during the night. The town has to prevent that. When Peach is kidnapped at night, the kidnapper has to be lynched the next day or else the town will lose."

During this week I will be sending out pms with the amount of coins everyone has. Pm me if I forget you.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #1628 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:01 am

Wow, this is really bad. I'm going to be L/A today, but we gotta work overtime to try to figure out Bowser...

DarlaBlueEyes · Post Post #1629 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:04 am

I'm confused, how do we figure out who Bowser is/who HAs peach?

I'm probably missing something totally obvious ...

iamausername · Post Post #1630 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:16 am

Riceball, you hammered incrediball, even though you supposedly don't have a vote. Explain.

I think whoever killed armlx should step forward and accept their glory. I also think we might want to massclaim today. We're in serious trouble here.

farside22 · Post Post #1631 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:19 am

I want to know why Armlx defended iamusername and AlaskaJ right now.

Surye · Post Post #1632 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:47 am

farside22 wrote:I want to know why Armlx defended iamusername and AlaskaJ right now.

Better ask armlx. OH WAIT.

Surye · Post Post #1633 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:51 am

Surye wrote:
farside22 wrote:I want to know why Armlx defended iamusername and AlaskaJ right now.
Better ask armlx. OH WAIT.

To clarify my sarcasm,

HOS farside22

for asking a question she knows cannot be answered now that armlx is down, but highlighting we should be suspicious of these two. Sounds more likely to me farside is trying to finish what armlx started.

TheSweatpantsNinja · Post Post #1634 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:55 am

She's trying to finish what he started by attacking players he defended?

Surye · Post Post #1635 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:58 am

Yes. It's a common scum tactic to buddy with a townie, either to be vindacated by his death, or to cast suspicion on the townie in the case of the scum's death. farside-scum therefore would assist in the latter situation. Can't believe you missed my meaning there :3

farside22 · Post Post #1636 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:11 am

Surye wrote:Yes. It's a common scum tactic to buddy with a townie, either to be vindacated by his death, or to cast suspicion on the townie in the case of the scum's death. farside-scum therefore would assist in the latter situation. Can't believe you missed my meaning there :3

Give me a break. It doesn't always happen that way. There were people already suspicious of iamusername when alaska and armlx both jumped in to stop that from happening.

Surye · Post Post #1637 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:12 am

That's true and fine, but were you asking an honest question? If so, who were you expecting to answer?

TheSweatpantsNinja · Post Post #1638 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:15 am

Which means that armlx knew he was going to get nightkilled, and intentionally defended players hoping that they would then be lynched. . . to what end?

iamausername · Post Post #1639 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:24 am

What? Where are you getting "armlx knew he was going to be nightkilled" from?

Surye · Post Post #1640 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:28 am

TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:Which means that armlx knew he was going to get nightkilled, and intentionally defended players hoping that they would then be lynched. . . to what end?

If you read my post, you'd see I outlined the strategy as working if he is killed, or the other is killed, at any point. Re-read what I posted please.

populartajo · Post Post #1641 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:48 am

I dont see enough massclaim.
And I was the one who killed armlx.

iamausername · Post Post #1642 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:56 am

populartajo wrote:I dont see enough massclaim.

Massclaims work better with a bit of organisation. Why don't you draw us up an order?

populartajo wrote:And I was the one who killed armlx.

Oh. Huh.

farside22 · Post Post #1643 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:00 am

Surye wrote:That's true and fine, but were you asking an honest question? If so, who were you expecting to answer?

I wanted to know everyones thought on the matter really. I mean do you really think that armlx was protecting a townie when people were voting to lynch him?

TheSweatpantsNinja · Post Post #1644 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:05 am

Well done then, pt. (I'm all for keeping that guy full of stars, although it may not matter).

surye wrote: If you read my post, you'd see I outlined the strategy as working if he is killed, or the other is killed, at any point. Re-read what I posted please.

I read your post. Might armlx have been defending townies so as to make himself look better? Maybe. Might armlx have been defending townies to make them look worse in the event of their death?

Maybe

, although I'm not sure what his gain would be in this large a game. Might armlx have been defending scumbuddies? Maybe. Hell, in a game with at least three scum factions, he could have been defending scum of a different faction without even knowing it.

The point is, the suspicion of farside based on the idea that she might be somehow "following up" on armlx's strategy, (which

only

makes sense if for some reason armlx was trying to get those two lynched, and again, to what end?), is a serious stretch.

Surye · Post Post #1645 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:12 am

Scum trying to get people lynched to what end? Seriously? TSPN provided nothing but useless WIFOM and some silly statement that says scum doesn't try to get people lynched, and can't work together. Anyways.

Gremwell · Post Post #1646 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:26 am

so I'm guessing that I'm not cleared then? oh well at least you hit scum. so we have at least 3 scum groups, 2 have lost their head characters. Here's a question for Wario Inc and the DK crew, what are your win conditions? If it was to steal the princess, then that ship is about to sail. If something else then if we don't lynch right today, you'll never see those conditions filled. Also do you all know who is in your group (ie masons/cultist)? I don't know what the case is but we all need to work together to figure this out.

also we need to hit the kidnapper or Bowser? Do we as the Kingdom have any sort of roles to help figure this out. Seems like a needle in a haystack.

and finally are we going to be claiming?

somestrangeflea · Post Post #1647 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:13 am

iamausername wrote:I also think we might want to massclaim today

Why?

skitzer · Post Post #1648 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:26 am

I'm really confused by farside22's question. armlx can't answer it, and he is the only one who knows this. Surye makes a good point.

Korts · Post Post #1649 (ISO) » Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:30 am

I agree we need a massclaim.