Mini 2144: Yu-Gi-Oh Card UPick Game Over - Good Cards Win.

[Porkens]

What that sucks VOTE: unvote VOTE: crimson

[Elsa Jay]

Super saint ain’t a yugioh card neither.

2 words: Magical Cylinder.

But carry on friend.

[Socratés]

N

i

c

e

f

a

k

e

-

v

o

t

e

S

o

c

r

a

t

Hmm? It's a legitimate vote, which moves me to the end of the wagon now.

[Porkens]

No they tricked me, I’m not playing anymore.

Socrates readslist is total crap. You could say similar things about half the player list, including those who have like 4 posts. Elsa has been cool to me and she believed in me when the rest of you didn’t and I think she’s town. Crimson is rediculously scum and Elsa is the only one who sees that. I’m calling two scum in crimson and Socrates right now and those are solid gold locks. LYNCH CRIMSON LUNCH CRIMSON. Come on lurkers DO something with your life!

LONG LIVE THE ICE QUEEN

[Socratés]

Shireen posting nothing is different from Elsa Jay posting nothing.
Crimson is not ridiculously scum; you are wrong.

If Elsa is Super Saint, I get killed on her lynch -- I'm happy to hammer -- so that's a win if I'm scum, yeah?

[Porkens]

Yep I can’t argue with that logic Socrates. But you are spouting nonsense about crimson, and holding her Royal Iceness to a double standard.

[Socratés]

You do not believe in evaluating people upon their own merits?

Shireen, for example, is a slot I know will lurk out and post nada as either alignment.
Jay, I know to contribute well.

Thus, Shireen posting jackshit isn't particularly AI for me, whereas Jay posting fluff and doing nothing is.

What is the problem with this logic?

[Porkens]

The problem is you are basing your judgments of others on your own biased egocentric construct of reality. You can’t escape your own head, so you are blind to the reality of the universe around you. Also you are just pulling this shit out of your ass.

[Elsa Jay]

You also haven't gone out your way to list what game I acted differently in so people can fact check it. Just saying "Elsa is different" doesn't mean much when you don't point someone to a specific point of reference.

[Socratés]

Aren't all judgments affected by personal experience and egocentric constructs of reality, and correctly so?
How do you know that your perceived construct of reality is the true reality?

[Socratés]

You also haven't gone out your way to list what game I acted differently in so people can fact check it. Just saying "Elsa is different" doesn't mean much when you don't point someone to a specific point of reference.

Sure.
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=81421&user_select[]=31936

[Elsa Jay]

That game wasn't my finest moment, I admit. But different mechanics, different rules.

For the sake of fairness, I will allow you to explain the differences between me in that game and here though.

[Socratés]

This game: Lots of fluff
That game: Solving

That was easy!

[Socratés]

You are welcome to show me a game where you're town and just fluff post, to the extent that you've done here.

[Porkens]

Aren't all judgments affected by personal experience and egocentric constructs of reality, and correctly so?
How do you know that your perceived construct of reality is the true reality?

Of course they are! But no not correctly so, as they blind us from truly unbiased judgment. We must remember that we are all blind. The difference between us is that I know I am. Therefore I am empowered to see what you do not

[Socratés]

I acknowledge that I am also biased. When I say correctly, I mean justifiably so. I am equally empowered to see what you do not, in symmetry with you.

Saying that I must not believe something because you do not share the same reasoning, while also not disagreeing with my reasoning itself and also not showing that I am unjustified in holding said belief...

[Socratés]

do not share the same reasoning

Conclusions* would be more appropriate.

[Porkens]

I need not explain to you that rain is wet, though you claim it dry.

[Elsa Jay]

You are welcome to show me a game where you're town and just fluff post, to the extent that you've done here.

There. Happy?

Frankly I shitposted there more.

[Elsa Jay]

Actually that game reminded me. Jackson. We've played before and you voted me back then too for being scummy when I was the town PR. We're doing the "I'm Scummy" dance a second time when it's just my personality.

Sigh. Can't believe we're having a repeat performance.

[Socratés]

I need not explain to you that rain is wet, though you claim it dry.

Which claim of mine is objectively is as false as "Rain is dry"?
1. Elsa is largely fluffposting this game
2. Elsa as town solves more than she has this game

You are welcome to show me a game where you're town and just fluff post, to the extent that you've done here.

There. Happy?

Frankly I shitposted there more.

I see shitposts, but I also see independent thought and solving.
Here I see very little of the latter.

[Socratés]

I do find Elsa Jay fun to play with, although that must not bias me away from lynching her when I do scumread her.

[Porkens]

There you go asking for objectivity again even after admiring its a false concept.

LONG LIVE THE ICE QUEEN

[Elsa Jay]

Can't I just have a chill lazy game during quarantine? Jeez. Let me play differently in peace, hopefully not Aristophanes. Well if you are, picking a different philosper isn't the best disguise.

And that game begun with certain people interacting with me, when I was in an active mood. This week I'm in Passive mode. Honestly reading any of my games I feel like my level of silliness fluctuates. Reading me is hard.

[Porkens]

My frosty highness, do you, in your crystalline wisdom believe Socrates is scum?