LG reread.
33, throws out the SK speculation
69, asks farside why bringing up the SK is bad, this has already been answered quite well by Mac
140, basically just lets us know he's alive
174
, sets himself up for voting Netlava
175
, Netlava is exactly right. Everything in the entire post is golden.
176
, votes Netlava with terrible reasoning.
188, no point of this other to just remind people that Netlava did something that can be considered fishy
212, Netlava is right again, by this time Mac has taken over lynching Netlava duties, convienently leaving LG's hands virtually clean
215, LG defends himself some more
221, THAT'S wishy washy camn...
258, by Netlava
Netlava wrote:Lord Gurgi:
- Did not answer what the point of bringing up the SK discussion was (avoids this question a second time later)
- Votes Charter way back, clings to this vote, affirms his suspicions of Charter multiple times, yet does not push the bandwagon
- Post 174 -
LG wrote:Hmm, I really want Netlava to defend himself first. He might be continuing on a suspicion from the last game. (I have suspicions about a number of players doing this) Did he hound you last game?
In this post, he pretends to want to hear my defense and then subtly attacks my accusations of Riot.
1. "I really want Netlava to defend himself first" - False concern as it should be obvious that I'm going to defend myself. What he's really trying to do is make his intended bandwagoning less obvious.
2. "(I have suspicions about a number of players doing this) " - And just how did you get these suspicions? I'm guessing you skimmed the thread of the last game. So why ask "Did he hound you?" when you already know the answer? Set-up! You could have just stated it outright.
- Disguises the post as "giving me a chance" and "due turn"
- Votes me "until I provide some decent explanation." More like until I get lynched and hopefully no one notices right!? Doesn't push my wagon.
- Dissapearing act enables him to dodge a bunch of my accusations so that I have to summarize them again for him.
I want to hear
LG's
response to this since you never responded yesterday.
265, I addressed this in my post 266
277, finally answers why he brought up the SK, when it's obvious Netlava has attracted all attention from the rest of the town
278,
Mac
, you say you think LG is probably town, do you still feel this way? Why or why not?
317, his first useful content filled post. However, is there any content in there? He lists suspicions about everyone, and very little is original. However, something is worth noting, the only thing he says about farside is that she completely ignored the apple discussion. This leads me to believe two things, Fark and LG are not scum together. This leads to some interesting questions, such as why was Fark so hesitant to vote Walnut today?
384, camn has both her scum candidates wrong...
399, another good post by Netlava
419, LG defends Thesp, has been buddying up to him in a post preiously as well
421, lol
434, anxious to lynch a townie
448
, this is worth looking into
451, STILL anxious to pull off the lynch before something can happen
497, blatent directing unfounded suspicion at me and still clings to his poor reasoning
535, votes me and gives no new reason, why didn't he do this in his first post of D2? Oh, I had no one voting me at the time so he couldn't latch on to someone else's case.
577, I addressed this in my 579
634, "Unvote charter cause everyone else is so I need to blend in, but I'm still just as suspicous of charter and will revote him in a heartbeat if he gets votes again."
642, gross overreaction to suspicion of him. This happened once before when I said a mere "screams scum" to one of his posts. Also, since I've said I'm 99% sure he's scum, his daily posting has basically tripled.
In short, LG latches on to other's arguments and does nothing to further wagons. His play is very opportunistic. Does zero scumhunting. His posts do nothing but cast unfounded suspicion on whoever is the leading vote holder at the time.
Honestly, I can see Thesp as being scum now, unless he actually gives reasons for suspecting who he does, I can't see any reason for him not to suspect LG while suspecting the others for the same reasons which makes me think they could be buddies.
I don't see my vote changing off of LG. I will clarify/elaborate if someone does not understand something I am saying. If I was LG's scumbuddy, now is when I'd start bussing him...