Re-read of Merc, as I feel it is necessary.
Posts regarding TSQ are starting to stand out, because even after an active player joined that game and gave their opinion, he continuelly attacked her with little logic.
I think I might have said this before but, I
REALLY
did not like the Mega lynch. You lynched a player based on the trolling actions of another IC, but this is where I start to feel worried and why I felt that Mega was lynched because she was suspicious of Mirth.
Merc wrote:Mega's vote on Mirth doesn't make any sense to me. With a looming deadline it really does stand out to vote for Mirth when nobody else has been doing so.
IIRC, Mega was barely given anytime to explain her vote and this says to me that Merc voted Mega with little reasoning other then 'Mirth is in danger!' And if that isn't his reasoning, it's a very opportunistic vote all the same.
@Mirth; [quote="Merc"I'll stand by what I wrote, for better or worse. Mirth, you appeared to be the most honest scumhunter in day 1. To me, that makes you a target for Mafia in the night. You didn't die? That means something to my opinion of the game. If it makes me scummy to say it then so be it.[/quot]
This is a wishy-washy statement?
Merc wrote: haven't really made up my mind on the truth of your claim. If it's true, then I've got nothing to worry about. If it's false then you're scum. It could go either way. At this moment, I'm reading what other people have had to say about it to give me a better idea. You've thrown all your cards on the table, some face up, some face down.
This says to me, I don't know what to think about your post and I'm waiting to be told what to think Definately something I don't like.
[quote"Merc"]Mirth: That's a nice story, and I know you've all been saying lurking isn't scummy and etc. But are you also telling me that you've never seen a lurker turn out to be scum? What bothered me about TSQ's play was that he seemed to clam up when attention was drawn back to him. Maybe that's just coincidental with whatever kept him away from the game, but the one word post at the end (his last one) seemed to me like he was ignoring the town's questions directed at him, and that bothered me. If I ignored questions you directed at me, would that bother you? [/quote]
I feel like this is really bad reasoning. 'There was the chance that TSQ was scum, so I am going to vote him and hope for the best!' Once again, I feel that this kind of bad logic played a part in Mega's lynch. And I just don't like it. If Merc was scum, it'd be way to easy for him to say 'Well, TSQ is obv. lurker! SCUM!'
Merc wrote: Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:19 pm Malex: It seemed to me that Batto's use of FoS is more of a play style thing. The only thing that really matters to the game is a vote, whereas Batto (IMO) uses FoS almost like a summary. Not the way I (plan to) play the game, but I don't really have too much of a problem with it.
AK47x2: Boo!
[quote="Merc] Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:46 pm
mercdaemon wrote:Battousai wrote:In all honesty, I was only going to FOS Malex, then I noticed Grem didn't vote since then either. Must have missed Merc as well.
FOS: Merc
I find it amusing that you FOS me only after Mirth tells you to do so. Can you give the court your reasoning why you think I'm suspicious? I've already stated my opinion that Mirth's reasoning behind thinking I'm scum is flimsy approaching non-existent, but all she wants to do is keep going with the "I think Merc is scum line". Got anything else yourself?
Contradictory posts.
With this read-through, plus
some
of the reasoning of Mirth, I'm feeling a little bit better about a Merc lynch. Mostly for opportunistic voting. contradictory posts, and the Mega/TSQ lynch reasoning.