remussaidow wrote:and if you note, I also peg myself as a likely target. Yes, I fully expect myself to be alive tomorrow IF IAM DIES, as that is the condition for the target naming. All I said was that if I'm wrong myself and Grimmy are looking incredibly scummy. Its a simple, true statement.
Grimmy is looking reasonably scummy, sure. However, a) you're not voting Grimmy, you're voting iamausername (despite you apparently thinking Grimmy is looking "incredibly scummy"... but ok, this is the hypothetical case where we lynch iam and he's not scum, correct?) and b) it's not the truthiness of the statement that really matters in this case, it's the fact that you're setting up a chain lynch. What you're essentially saying is that if you're wrong, we should lynch Grimmy, not you.
And no, its not just because I feel that he misunderstood/ misinterpreted the town's win condition. It's because he pushed for a lynch that should never have come up until tomorrow. And its also because he fought against my solitary vote as though it were the one putting him at lynch -one. If it were me being accused in that situation, as town I wouldn't mind the one or two votes based off of this apparent evidence. Its the fact that he tried to fight, continuously, the same point, when it had to be obvious that I wasn't changing MY opinion on the matter, that my vote stays upon him firmly.
Well, he did abandon that Yos2-wagon pretty quickly. So it's his over-eager defense of himself that you find anti-town?
Also, cavebear, great job on cutting up my statement so you only show the part that you want everyone else to read. I proposed a hypothetical situation of an anti-town faction that was not scum aligned either. You repeated it, in quotes, yet ignored the point where I called it hypothetical.
This doesn't really change the fact that the statement even as a whole was anti-town. Speculating can be fun, but it didn't accomplish anything except instill a feeling of stress that we might be at LYLO any second. Still, if you feel yourself treated unfairly or misquoted, I apologize. I loathe being misquoted myself. I usually quote what I feel is the relevant part of posts (instead of eg bolding), assuming that people read everything and can go back to check the surrounding text, but maybe I cut a bit carelessly.
Nocmen wrote:Cavebear, you do realize that voting for remus doesn't actually vote for remus, right?
D'oh. Thanks.
Unvote, vote: iamausername
(->remus)
