We just had 3 effing days of watching townies get lynched or be NK'd and you're still going on about why we shouldn't have lynched hellbooks!scum when she was fucking caught? Are you kidding me?In post 2052, Bingle wrote:The hellbooks lynch was in no way town indicative. She was caught in a trap that meant she couldn't reach endgame as soon as she claimed, so being on her wagon is a given for her scumbuddies. Even if you are town, we don't know why you didn't die D1. If farside is telling the truth, then vigging you should get rid of a different scum. If farside is lying scum, then vigging you should make that obvious.In post 2009, Starbuck wrote:Why? I, with farside, caught scum red-handed with no scum kills for 3 days before that. I have no idea why this slot survived D1 either and I'd love if we could figure it out, but it doesn't lie within my role. I'm concerned that you're still pushing this.
You and MT were the two deflecting the rest of us from the hellbooks lynch yesterday and don't think that I've forgotten that. Not to mention how much you were pushing for me to be loverized with someone today and how you are lamenting about it now.
If you read my ISO, I was never against pushing hb, I was against pushing hb yesterday. Which is 100% the correct thing to do. If she had been town, we could have gotten additional information, but we didn't lose anything by leaving her alive while we hunted her buddy.
You were the one that kept going on about wanting to lynch groupscum over any other scum, so much so that you were whiteknighting the fuck out of hellbooks to get the wagon to halt. Now, you are still trying to defend the reason why caught scum shouldn't be lynched, but it goes against all of the reasoning you gave yesterday. On top of the fact, that she was the type of scum that you wanted to lynch. So you can't weasel out of this, dude. You can't have it both ways.
I think you're her scumbuddy and you need to die.