i need to see this slot lynched d1 otherwise what the fuck is town doing
do you really think i'm scum? how sure are you?
sure enough that i wanna get you lynched
and even if you aren't scum i'm happy with a policy lynch on your slot because unvoting player A because "player B is at E-1" is the easiest way to get an accidental quickhammer and it has no fucking place in a game of mafia if you're town
"I would also like to reiterate my claim that Osuka is sort of obviously town" - rc about scumsuka
"don't tell anyone, but there's a reason why you're one of my favourite people to mod for" - datisi
"I would also like to reiterate my claim that Osuka is sort of obviously town" - rc about scumsuka
"don't tell anyone, but there's a reason why you're one of my favourite people to mod for" - datisi
"I would also like to reiterate my claim that Osuka is sort of obviously town" - rc about scumsuka
"don't tell anyone, but there's a reason why you're one of my favourite people to mod for" - datisi
anyway the thought didn't cross my mind that someone might have thought i was unvoting bugspray in that post. a votecount was made just a page ago after all. someone would have to not be reading the thread at all to make that sort of mistake, a mindset not likely to correspond w/ the weighty decision to bring someone to the edge of death. super unlikely.
"I would also like to reiterate my claim that Osuka is sort of obviously town" - rc about scumsuka
"don't tell anyone, but there's a reason why you're one of my favourite people to mod for" - datisi
"I would also like to reiterate my claim that Osuka is sort of obviously town" - rc about scumsuka
"don't tell anyone, but there's a reason why you're one of my favourite people to mod for" - datisi
supposing you're town, once it's obvious that i'm town i think it's important that you think a lot about what's so wrong about your play patterns. you'll want to tell yourself that it was a one-off thing — it's obviously you're on that track with this language claiming i deserve to be policy lynched. but it's more a systematic pattern in how you play/think. intellectual laziness, basically. if bugspray's town they have it even worse.
In post 405, osuka wrote:that only raises the question: why the fuck does bugspray being at e-1 make you unvote someone else entirely? that makes no sense whatsoever
i already said why. i wanted to take a step back for a more global review of the gamestate. it doesn't make sense to you bc you're just not thinking very much about it. maybe would help if you typed less and thought more?
you keep saying my whole story is "full of holes" but you never make the effort to list them. readers are supposed to just guess at what they are. do you even know what they are, exactly?
In post 246, bugspray wrote:VOTE: psyche I agree he's fucking weird in a scum way
can you try going into a little detail
bugspray also never attempted an explanation of his vote for me, not even after being prompted. even if he's town, it just doesn't advance the gamestate to float along like this. and in the end it's an example of the sort of play that got him to L-1. osuka's not been as bad, but it's the same category of lazy bullshit.
In post 246, bugspray wrote:VOTE: psyche I agree he's fucking weird in a scum way
can you try going into a little detail
bugspray also never attempted an explanation of his vote for me, not even after being prompted. even if he's town, it just doesn't advance the gamestate to float along like this. and in the end it's an example of the sort of play that got him to L-1. osuka's not been as bad, but it's the same category of lazy bullshit.
my pronouns are they/them
psyche you're doing a lot of active posting and interaction for someone who said that they need to sit back and look at gamestate
scum loves to make up an excuse to fuck off but its very easy (i know this from ersonal experience) to actualyl fuck off as promised and instead gets into this weird petty argument you have with osuka
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 417, Psyche wrote:my problem is in fact that i don't let go of stuff when i should
maybe you should go see a psychologist
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
let it go
let it go
let it gooo
something something votes
the wagon stagates
something else
let the day roll on
the scum never bothered me anyway
damn i still havent seen frozen
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 246, bugspray wrote:VOTE: psyche I agree he's fucking weird in a scum way
can you try going into a little detail
bugspray also never attempted an explanation of his vote for me, not even after being prompted. even if he's town, it just doesn't advance the gamestate to float along like this. and in the end it's an example of the sort of play that got him to L-1. osuka's not been as bad, but it's the same category of lazy bullshit.
my pronouns are they/them
psyche you're doing a lot of active posting and interaction for someone who said that they need to sit back and look at gamestate
scum loves to make up an excuse to fuck off but its very easy (i know this from ersonal experience) to actualyl fuck off as promised and instead gets into this weird petty argument you have with osuka
maybe you should express remorse over misgendering me
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
so we'll call osuka done; bugspray I'll return to last. starting with looker since he may still be around:
looker's last few posts are odd. in particular: his 413 is a surprisingly incurious move in the context of his other posts.
deadline remains far away and there are several active areas of discussion - why interrupt them? in particular, he's apparently interested in seeing a post i've committed to making (as 396, 410 suggests) and sees me as an object of particular interest for the scarce resources of our PRs (413), and yet instead of waiting or pressing further for it he's encouraging an early hammer? in fact, he's asked for a lot of content lately, with some of those requests not yet fulfilled. does he not really care about them? An additional point of observation is that by asking for a lynch, he's voicing far greater confidence in bugspray's lynch than he's articulated so far. When he voted for bugspray, all he articulated as a motive was an interest in seeing if the player's "oh there's an IC" comment was a scumslip or not. Is that enough for an early lynch?
In sum, 413 makes me wonder if the questions and prompts that litter his iso aren't so much a sincere expression of curiosity as just pretending to be that. It's a very out-of-character post.
i was gonna say that 416 is your first substantive post in a really long time, but it doesn't even answer the question asked
you're still doing so little. and if you are town and get mislynched, you're gonna blame us, but part of the reason why will be because you just don't do the bare minimum.
the more i think about it, the more it seems that the reason i haven't felt much affinity for the bugspray wagon is that i've seen so many townies get lynched for not being productive, coherent players. it's not really an alignment-indicative behavior on its own (scum have plenty of interest in being productive/coherent), but for some reason people on mafiascum.net just eat that shit up. everywhere i look in fact i just see half-assed justifications for voting them like what looker's decided is enough to justify a hammer.
maybe when i look closely at bugspray i'll see something stronger than that weaksauce but so far it's just a void why is it just a void
