Unfortunately, a lot of this game is beginning to get tl;dr for me, due to time restrictions. I'm thoroughly reading everything right now, but I can't promise the same a week or so in the future...BM wrote:Skimming is scummy because protown players are more likely to read stuff in order to understand it and properly comment on it. Scum dont need to hunt scum, and can afford to be lazy. This does not necessarily apply in tl;dr type posts, but in general, i feel it's a pretty sound scumtell.
Welcome to the Non-Contribution Zone. Please pick up your complementary vote from one of our players.DynamoXI wrote:Welcome to page 25 ;PCitizen Karne wrote:Erm, can I sign the treaty?
rofl! This man is clearly protown.Citizen Karne wrote:Erm, can I sign the treaty?
You realize that he's being replaced, right?Cyberbob wrote:With Regard To.StrangerCoug wrote:"WRT"?
Ah, I see. You were looking at the amount of time spent on the discussion, not the discussion per se.Netlava wrote:@ Cyberbob: My "discussion" of the pact does not contradict my reasons for suspecting people. I gave about 2 lines on why I thought the pact's validity was a non-issue, and that peter's & earthworm's long back and forth made it an issue. Note that "too interested" was my reason.
Unvote, Vote: Animorphperv1
BM, BM, don't try to misrepresent me. I never said you were scummy, at least not in this game so far. All I said was that I'm gonna keep my eye on you for a while, because this pact's impact on the game could've been both pro- and anti-town, and you were the one who started discussion about it.BM wrote:Notice that Korts claimed i was 'scummy' but didnt give any reasons, falling on the same pedastal as you- that by participating alot, i am more likely to be scum, despite failing to come up with any real scumtells from those posts.
You're elegantly avoiding the fact that townies aren't always decided on a particular matter just because they're townies.BM wrote:True enough, but i see it more often from scum than town, because town has no reason not to commit to opinions.
I smell slight OMGUS.Snaps_the_Pirate wrote:Wow, does that sound like he is scared of BM?SC wrote:Let’s change the subject for just a moment so neither of us end up clawing at each other and winning nothing at the end. I will take a look at the other 24 players in this game and post my opinions of them based on their posts, and I want you to do the same thing. I think we've made it clear that we each think the other is scum, so don't do me and I won't do you.
SrangerCoug has said an awful lot, but has not said very much. He mentions his case on me a few times. What case? He has said nothing for me to defend.
He also talks about being misrepresented, yet he stated I was anti-pact. My only comment on the pact was that it was null and wouldn’t affect the game one way or the other. How is that “anti-pact”? Who is mis-representing who?
StrangerCoug has yet to anwser my simple question “Why did he initially vote BM?”. It’s a very simple and fair question. Yet he has completely ignored it.
Vote StrangerCoug
Being wrong is suspicious activity how exactly?BM wrote:FoS: CyberBob for being, just plain WRONG.
I don't... exactly follow. Where do you make the connection between the two hypothetical situations?SC wrote:You say you hope scum joins the pact, which sounds a bit like something scum itself would say. It's like saying I hope scum kills Battle Mage tonight if he doesn't get lynched (especially since it would imply that I know Battle Mage is town)
Why is it definitely futile to continue? There has been no proof of this.SC wrote:OK, so it's better for us to engage in an ultimately futile vendetta?
Um, you took it seriously?SC wrote:Laughed at Korts's pact made in retaliation to his own.
They're not both hypothetical. Cephrir really did say he hopes scum gets in the treaty, which came off to me as his being scum itself. What would you think of me if I said "I hope scum kills Battle Mage"?Korts wrote:I don't... exactly follow. Where do you make the connection between the two hypothetical situations?SC wrote:You say you hope scum joins the pact, which sounds a bit like something scum itself would say. It's like saying I hope scum kills Battle Mage tonight if he doesn't get lynched (especially since it would imply that I know Battle Mage is town)
All it was doing to each other in the long run was giving us tunnel vision. That's why I wanted to stop it.Korts wrote:Why is it definitely futile to continue? There has been no proof of this.SC wrote:OK, so it's better for us to engage in an ultimately futile vendetta?
No, hence why I laughed.Korts wrote:Um, you took it seriously?SC wrote:Laughed at Korts's pact made in retaliation to his own.
It's this part that I can't follow. I don't understand how the first part warrants the other.SC wrote:Cephrir really did say he hopes scum gets in the treaty, which came off to me as his being scum itself.
Heh. But in the original context, you said it was BM who laughed at my coalition, and you never implied (at least not in the originally quoted post) that you acknowledged it as a joke.SC wrote:No, hence why I laughed.Korts wrote:Um, you took it seriously?SC wrote: Laughed at Korts's pact made in retaliation to his own.
I think that's a bit ridiculous. So you think that something which i started, of which the consequences are NOT inherently scummy, should be a reason for me to be scum, IF it turns out to hurt the town? I cant really explain how ridiculous that sounds in my head... 0.oKorts wrote:BM, BM, don't try to misrepresent me. I never said you were scummy, at least not in this game so far. All I said was that I'm gonna keep my eye on you for a while, because this pact's impact on the game could've been both pro- and anti-town, and you were the one who started discussion about it.BM wrote:Notice that Korts claimed i was 'scummy' but didnt give any reasons, falling on the same pedastal as you- that by participating alot, i am more likely to be scum, despite failing to come up with any real scumtells from those posts.
You tell me. Ya know, given that you made the same point above.Korts wrote:Being wrong is suspicious activity how exactly?BM wrote:FoS: CyberBob for being, just plain WRONG.
Far too long ago. I'm working my way up through the pages, but I'm still about six pages behind... I've half a mind to leave it, but I owe you guys a proper read.BM wrote:Also, how long ago did i make that post? 0.o
I'm tackling the issue now, in case, later on, you decide to try and vote me, for starting a Pact, which, in 50 pages time, somehow causes the town to go wrong.Korts wrote:Again, where have I said that this is a reason for you to be scum? You're trying hard to make this black and white. You're to be watched, but that doesn't equate by far to being actually scummy. You're in the spotlight now, too late for second thoughts, no?
vote for him then. With you, me, and Armlx, this wagon will surely prevail!Lowell wrote:I like those jumping on the Cass wagon (it's a good one), but post 625 is weak.
More votes for dynamo would be in order as well. He's been talked about a lot for someone with only 3 votes. Just seems strange.
And you think I could trust you (or anyone else in the town for that matter) not to call me out on such complete BS?Battle Mage wrote:I'm tackling the issue now, in case, later on, you decide to try and vote me, for starting a Pact, which, in 50 pages time, somehow causes the town to go wrong.Korts wrote:Again, where have I said that this is a reason for you to be scum? You're trying hard to make this black and white. You're to be watched, but that doesn't equate by far to being actually scummy. You're in the spotlight now, too late for second thoughts, no?
BM
There are not many scenarios that I can think of where town should be hoping out loud that scum does something specific. It's not a scum direction per se, but it still encourages scum to act in a certain way, which probably won't be beneficial to town.Korts wrote:It's this part that I can't follow. I don't understand how the first part warrants the other.SC wrote:Cephrir really did say he hopes scum gets in the treaty, which came off to me as his being scum itself.
I have a tendency to drop the first person pronoun when it's clear that I'm the one being referred to, but I wasn't ><Korts wrote:SC wrote:Heh. But in the original context, you said it was BM who laughed at my coalition, and you never implied (at least not in the originally quoted post) that you acknowledged it as a joke.Korts wrote:SC wrote: Laughed at Korts's pact made in retaliation to his own.No, hence why I laughed.Korts wrote:Um, you took it seriously?
Yeah yeah I realize the hypocrisy. Problem is I really like the Cass wagon as well.armlx wrote:I'm interested in this as well.@Lowell, why is it weak?
I like how Lowell also says that Dynamo is mentioned a lot and has few votes, but in doing so mentions him and doesn't vote/
if not, why are you bring up said 'complete BS' as a scenario now?Korts wrote:And you think I could trust you (or anyone else in the town for that matter) not to call me out on such complete BS?Battle Mage wrote:I'm tackling the issue now, in case, later on, you decide to try and vote me, for starting a Pact, which, in 50 pages time, somehow causes the town to go wrong.Korts wrote:Again, where have I said that this is a reason for you to be scum? You're trying hard to make this black and white. You're to be watched, but that doesn't equate by far to being actually scummy. You're in the spotlight now, too late for second thoughts, no?
BM
rofl. Remind me never to Mod a game for you!StrangerCoug wrote:Mod: Please fix my quote tags. It should be nested Korts/SC/Korts/SC/Korts one inside the other.
