Explosiva Mafia - GAME OVER

[Coron]

I have no idea what Coron means by:

Coron: Yes, because the only use of buddy is in the contexts of "scum buddy"

Did you follow the link from DGB's post? It links to a post in which I quote your vote for me and say "Hey buddy."

[forbiddanlight]

Forbiddenlight - I didn't like the way you OMGUSed ?Twomz?

You know, this kinda made your whole list a lot more invalid. You clearly aren't checking your facts. I blatantly OMGUS'd Tarhalindur. So, it always help to actually...READ when you do a reread.

[armlx]

M4yh3m, i realize Twomz's play is flawed, and I think he does too, but lynching him for it is probably not the optimal answer.

Not much to say about the DGB list other then I think Coron is town and lurkers aren't good lynches.

[alvinz95]

Forbiddenlight - I didn't like the way you OMGUSed ?Twomz?

You know, this kinda made your whole list a lot more invalid. You clearly aren't checking your facts. I blatantly OMGUS'd Tarhalindur. So, it always help to actually...READ when you do a reread.

yeah, ya know its a freaking NAME. I did a reread/skim so don't expect me to remember everything.

[forbiddanlight]

Forbiddenlight - I didn't like the way you OMGUSed ?Twomz?

You know, this kinda made your whole list a lot more invalid. You clearly aren't checking your facts. I blatantly OMGUS'd Tarhalindur. So, it always help to actually...READ when you do a reread.

yeah, ya know its a freaking NAME. I did a reread/skim so don't expect me to remember everything.

Names...are kinda important in mafia. I mean, you know, you'd pay more attention if you wanted to vote Tarhalindur and instead voted twomz, I think. If you are going to do a reread it's details like that that form good cases. Right now, it just seems like you carelessly put something together to look like you were contributing

[alvinz95]

Forbiddenlight - I didn't like the way you OMGUSed ?Twomz?

You know, this kinda made your whole list a lot more invalid. You clearly aren't checking your facts. I blatantly OMGUS'd Tarhalindur. So, it always help to actually...READ when you do a reread.

yeah, ya know its a freaking NAME. I did a reread/skim so don't expect me to remember everything.

Names...are kinda important in mafia. I mean, you know, you'd pay more attention if you wanted to vote Tarhalindur and instead voted twomz, I think. If you are going to do a reread it's details like that that form good cases. Right now, it just seems like you carelessly put something together to look like you were contributing

Carelessly? Now thats offending. I spent 30 minutes rereading/skimming, thinking, typing, and now I get some crap about how I forgot who you OMGUSed exactly. If this is to defend your OMGUS, its not really working.

[forbiddanlight]

Forbiddenlight - I didn't like the way you OMGUSed ?Twomz?

You know, this kinda made your whole list a lot more invalid. You clearly aren't checking your facts. I blatantly OMGUS'd Tarhalindur. So, it always help to actually...READ when you do a reread.

yeah, ya know its a freaking NAME. I did a reread/skim so don't expect me to remember everything.

Names...are kinda important in mafia. I mean, you know, you'd pay more attention if you wanted to vote Tarhalindur and instead voted twomz, I think. If you are going to do a reread it's details like that that form good cases. Right now, it just seems like you carelessly put something together to look like you were contributing

Carelessly? Now thats offending. I spent 30 minutes rereading/skimming, thinking, typing, and now I get some crap about how I forgot who you OMGUSed exactly. If this is to defend your OMGUS, its not really working.

Actually, it's more to point out why I'm not sure how trustworthy your analysis is already. I already defended the OMGUS in a rather peculiar way that got me in a bit of trouble. It's alright to look at me, since I have naught to hide. But, you know, don't expect me to not call you out on carelessness and how I perceive it.

[DrippingGoofball]

M4yh3m, i realize Twomz's play is flawed, and I think he does too, but lynching him for it is probably not the optimal answer.

Not much to say about the DGB list other then I think Coron is town and lurkers aren't good lynches.

So armlx... what are your top recommendations?

[alvinz95]

Forbiddenlight - I didn't like the way you OMGUSed ?Twomz?

You know, this kinda made your whole list a lot more invalid. You clearly aren't checking your facts. I blatantly OMGUS'd Tarhalindur. So, it always help to actually...READ when you do a reread.

yeah, ya know its a freaking NAME. I did a reread/skim so don't expect me to remember everything.

Names...are kinda important in mafia. I mean, you know, you'd pay more attention if you wanted to vote Tarhalindur and instead voted twomz, I think. If you are going to do a reread it's details like that that form good cases. Right now, it just seems like you carelessly put something together to look like you were contributing

Carelessly? Now thats offending. I spent 30 minutes rereading/skimming, thinking, typing, and now I get some crap about how I forgot who you OMGUSed exactly. If this is to defend your OMGUS, its not really working.

Actually, it's more to point out why I'm not sure how trustworthy your analysis is already. I already defended the OMGUS in a rather peculiar way that got me in a bit of trouble. It's alright to look at me, since I have naught to hide. But, you know, don't expect me to not call you out on carelessness and how I perceive it.

My scumlist was primarily focused on Max and BM. I was mostly rereading what Max and BM did. All the rest came as an aftterthought, in which I didn't entirely reread (skim). I guess you can say #3 isn't so trustworthy as most were from my memory. Also didn't you notice I put question marks around Twomz?

[forbiddanlight]

Forbiddenlight - I didn't like the way you OMGUSed ?Twomz?

You know, this kinda made your whole list a lot more invalid. You clearly aren't checking your facts. I blatantly OMGUS'd Tarhalindur. So, it always help to actually...READ when you do a reread.

yeah, ya know its a freaking NAME. I did a reread/skim so don't expect me to remember everything.

Names...are kinda important in mafia. I mean, you know, you'd pay more attention if you wanted to vote Tarhalindur and instead voted twomz, I think. If you are going to do a reread it's details like that that form good cases. Right now, it just seems like you carelessly put something together to look like you were contributing

Carelessly? Now thats offending. I spent 30 minutes rereading/skimming, thinking, typing, and now I get some crap about how I forgot who you OMGUSed exactly. If this is to defend your OMGUS, its not really working.

Actually, it's more to point out why I'm not sure how trustworthy your analysis is already. I already defended the OMGUS in a rather peculiar way that got me in a bit of trouble. It's alright to look at me, since I have naught to hide. But, you know, don't expect me to not call you out on carelessness and how I perceive it.

My scumlist was primarily focused on Max and BM. I was mostly rereading what Max and BM did. All the rest came as an aftterthought, in which I didn't entirely reread (skim). I guess you can say #3 isn't so trustworthy as most were from my memory. Also didn't you notice I put question marks around Twomz?

Fair enough then. This is mostly what I was looking for when I pressed you on it. Doesn't clear you but it definitely is consistent.

[Max]

I still think Max is the best person to bomb because of his still odd posts that are mostly jokes and not scumhunting, which apparently doesn't support his meta.

You've been in a game with me "2 of 4" Read it then tell me whether I'm playing different to my Meta in-fact look at every single game I've played, in practically every one (excluding 1 or 2) I've been confirmed as scum by most people. THIS just seems like an excuse to bandwagon you don't just agree with other people the use of the word "apparently" it means you disagree, bring something else to the table instead of just agreeing.

Vote: alvinz95

1. Max
-Puts an OMGUS upon me,

Reading posts may help you know, if I was someone else and read that post I would vote for you, I'm not voting you because you voted me, I'm voting you because you have doubted your vote

misquoting me

How did I misquote?, I took a sentence from your post, that's just quoting the bit I find scummy. I presumed by the use of the words "apparently doesn't support meta". Now the only people who would say apparently are those who don't think that it doesn't

saying that I only voted him for bandwagoning purpose,

You saw that everyone thinks I'm scum hence you voted

which makes no sense because I am the SECOND person to put a vote on which is by no means joining a "bandwagon"

Actually at this time I think that you were joining what you felt was inevitable.

[Max]

My scumlist was primarily focused on Max and BM. I was mostly rereading what Max and BM did. All the rest came as an aftterthought, in which I didn't entirely reread (skim). I guess you can say #3 isn't so trustworthy as most were from my memory. Also didn't you notice I put question marks around Twomz?

YOU MEAN YOU DID A SCUM LIST BASED ON OTHER PEOPLES THOUGHTS

HoS: alvinz95

[M4yhem]

Unvote, Vote:Crazy

for lacking integrity and backing off his alleged suspect under pressure.

I figured that the last part of Tar's case, the part that reads

Does anyone else see what's missing from forbiddanlight's posts? Oh right, scumhunting.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is why I'm calling IIoA on forbiddanlight.

advances an argument, particularly when Tar is on record as treating IIoA as a major tell.

I suppose you have a point. It’s not much of a arguement though because he hasn’t really given us any reason to think that tell is reliable, especially early in the game, and one of the posts quoted does contain scum hunting. I still say he wasn’t really saying anything he hadn’t said before.

M4yhem - I didn't like you lingering on lynching lurkers, but I can understand your point of view.

Oh lord. Why? Do you have reason to think all the lurkers are innocent? Do you think killing a lurker will harm the town; if so, how? Or are you just repeating what others have said?

killa seven - serious lurking. you post some fillers then leave.

Say what? So I can’t be in favour of killing lurkers, but it’s okay for DGB to kill killa seven......

because he’s lurking

?

Fos:alvinz95

Hang all hypocrites.

M4yh3m, i realize Twomz's play is flawed, and I think he does too, but lynching him for it is probably not the optimal answer.

I can live with sup-optimal if it fixes the problem.
What’s your solution?

lurkers are good lynches.

Fixed your quote.

[Jex]

V/LA until at least saturday. My schedule this week is jam packed.

[Max]

K-scope please post killa seven

[Crazy]

Unvote, Vote:Crazy for lacking integrity and backing off his alleged suspect under pressure.

I never was that suspicious of Forbiddan to be honest. I was just less suspicious of DGB's other choices.

I still wanna kill Iron Man, though. I'd probably put Max at #2, but I haven't looked at this game really in-dephtly yet, so I dunno.

Yes, I do plan on staying under the radar until I can say something decent.. No use in me getting myself lynched, right?

[Coron]

Unvote, Vote:Crazy for lacking integrity and backing off his alleged suspect under pressure.

I never was that suspicious of Forbiddan to be honest. I was just less suspicious of DGB's other choices.

I still wanna kill Iron Man, though. I'd probably put Max at #2, but I haven't looked at this game really in-dephtly yet, so I dunno.

Yes, I do plan on staying under the radar until I can say something decent.. No use in me getting myself lynched, right?

That's a scum strategy. Suspicion ++.

[Crazy]

Unvote, Vote:Crazy for lacking integrity and backing off his alleged suspect under pressure.

I never was that suspicious of Forbiddan to be honest. I was just less suspicious of DGB's other choices.

I still wanna kill Iron Man, though. I'd probably put Max at #2, but I haven't looked at this game really in-dephtly yet, so I dunno.

Yes, I do plan on staying under the radar until I can say something decent.. No use in me getting myself lynched, right?

That's a scum strategy. Suspicion ++.

In order to detect careless Mafias, you usually look for people who seem to stand out in the crowd. So naturally, the first step would be “Act like a crowd”. Don’t try forcibly to shine every game. Don’t see mountains where there are mice. Some players act as though they have to dominate every game, regardless if they have a clue or not. Such behaviour will confuse the other players, possibly making them follow you in vain, possibly making them lynch you and waste precious time.

[Coron]

In order to detect careless Mafias, you usually look for people who seem to stand out in the crowd. So naturally, the first step would be “Act like a crowd”. Don’t try forcibly to shine every game. Don’t see mountains where there are mice. Some players act as though they have to dominate every game, regardless if they have a clue or not. Such behaviour will confuse the other players, possibly making them follow you in vain, possibly making them lynch you and waste precious time.

Right, and our crowd should all be talking, not all be silent.

We act like a crowd by all looking for scum, not all trying to "fly under the radar."

[Crazy]

Well, that's what I'm planning on doing... as soon as I find some scum.

[Coron]

Well, that's what I'm planning on doing... as soon as I find some scum.

...there is no 100% scum "found" you have to say "such and such is more likely to be scum," and you should be able to do that now.

[Crazy]

Well, that's what I'm planning on doing... as soon as I find some scum.

...there is no 100% scum "found" you have to say "such and such is more likely to be scum," and you should be able to do that now.

I did that already. I'll do it again later.

[Twomz]

Being off the radar does not count as being under it does it?

[M4yhem]

I still wanna kill Iron Man, though. I'd probably put Max at #2, but I haven't looked at this game really in-dephtly yet, so I dunno.

When are you going to?

Yes, I do plan on staying under the radar until I can say something decent.. No use in me getting myself lynched, right?

What makes you think talking will get you lynched? I'm talking a lot and nobody suspects me. No more than the people who aren't talking, anyway.

If I can do it, so can you.

[DrippingGoofball]

Tarhalindur is letting us down.

Any objection to exploding Tarhalindur?