Mushroom Kingdom Mafia (Game over!)

Cream147 · Post Post #2400 (ISO) » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:56 am

killa seven wrote:I have 1 vote, and no mushroom, would like one please *looks at pop*.

Give 1 mushroom to killa seven

And see how that mushroom is no longer a waste?

Mod edit
Visible Votecount:
Alabaska J (6): farside22, Lord Gurgi, Natirasha, DarlaBlueEyes, forbiddanlight, Surye
Natirasha (3): ting =), Alabaska J, Cream147
ting =) (1): Riceballtail
mnowax (1): populartajo

Not voting (6): skitzer, killa seven, Gremwell, ashmite84, goborage, somestrangeflea

With 17 alive it takes 9 real votes to lynch.

Lawrencelot · Post Post #2401 (ISO) » Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:35 am

Cream147 wrote:
Give 1 mushroom to killa seven

Transaction succesful. Cream147 loses a mushroom and killa seven gains a mushroom.

Cream147 · Post Post #2402 (ISO) » Fri Sep 05, 2008 4:51 am

24 hours without a post, and it's a week from deadline!

populartajo · Post Post #2403 (ISO) » Fri Sep 05, 2008 4:52 am

mnowax claim

mnowax · Post Post #2404 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:03 am

why should i be claiming?

mnowax · Post Post #2405 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:04 am

oh and

vote: alabaska J

Lord Gurgi · Post Post #2406 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:04 am

This is Massclaim, so claim.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #2407 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:05 am

Cause it's what the cool townies are doing. You wanna be a cool townie, right mnowax? Unless you are scum. You aren't scum, are you? If you claim scum we'll give you a peaceful fireflower death so we can save a day of lynching.

No, actually, I think people are rather interested in why you have a poison mushroom.

Surye · Post Post #2408 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:05 am

Lord Gurgi wrote:This is Massclaim, so claim.

It's only a mass vote-claim

forbiddanlight · Post Post #2409 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:06 am

Surye wrote:
Lord Gurgi wrote:This is Massclaim, so claim.
It's only a mass vote-claim

Oh yeah...disregard my last statement. You are only claiming votes (totally forgot that)

Lord Gurgi · Post Post #2410 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:08 am

I don't see why the mod-confirmed toad needs to explain anything. As much as I love his vote for Alabaska, resistance to claim after everything that's happened is off.

ting =) · Post Post #2411 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:14 am

@everyone.
Do you guys want me to move my vote to someone voteless? I'd obviously prefer to leave it on Nat, but I'm willing to move it if you want to check me using rbt's ability.

Why is everyone not on him anyway?

@tajo.
I like a Nat lynch over him because Nat's case is more conclusive. He's been flat out caught in a lie already. Besides the two things I've been bringing up about Nat mentioning both protect-kidnap and how to protect with mushroom, there's also the question of why did Nat bother claiming at that time anyway? It served no purpose other than to make him look like a toad. It might have even worked, except he ended up tangling himself with contradictions and backtracking.

That said, I think Ala could well be scum. I have 3 people on my scum list. He's third.

populartajo · Post Post #2412 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:28 am

Ok here's the deal. Since we have some claims going on I THINK its extremely necessary for mnowax to claim. There's no way Peach can have a poisonous mushroom so no problem with that.

So please claim. NOW. Explain the motives for a townie role to have one poisonous mushroom. Better than that. Explain what does your mushrrom do? NOW..

And Nat's case is strange. Either he's a powerful Toad or he's scum. Im the confirmed Toad and I dont get coins. How's that possible? Someone please fireflower him tonight.

And Ting move your vote to No-Lynch please. Also, can you top your suspects?

For the moment I agree with an Ala lynch. If mnowaxy keeps refusing then pretty sure we caught a scum there.

Also

The following people havent confirmed they have zero coins. Please confirm.
-skitzer
-Gremwell
-Alabaska J
-DarlaBlueEyes
-ashmite84
-mnowax

Surye · Post Post #2413 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:40 am

Lord Gurgi wrote:I don't see why the mod-confirmed toad needs to explain anything.

This is so wrong and fallacious it hurts.

populartajo · Post Post #2414 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:46 am

Surye wrote:
Lord Gurgi wrote:I don't see why the mod-confirmed toad needs to explain anything.
This is so wrong and fallacious it hurts.

As much as Id like to disagree with this comment, I actually agree. But hey, at least, you can trust me.

Surye, you belong to another scum faction, right?

somestrangeflea · Post Post #2415 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:50 am

Surye wrote:
Lord Gurgi wrote:I don't see why the mod-confirmed toad needs to explain anything.
This is so wrong and fallacious it hurts.

Keff'd.

Town != Infallible.

populartajo wrote:Surye, you belong to another scum faction, right?

Where'd this come from?

Surye · Post Post #2416 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:52 am

populartajo wrote:
Surye wrote:
Lord Gurgi wrote:I don't see why the mod-confirmed toad needs to explain anything.
This is so wrong and fallacious it hurts.
As much as Id like to disagree with this comment, I actually agree. But hey, at least, you can trust me.

Surye, you belong to another scum faction, right?

Heh, you've got some sense of humor.

populartajo · Post Post #2417 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:55 am

somestrangeflea wrote:
Surye wrote:
Lord Gurgi wrote:I don't see why the mod-confirmed toad needs to explain anything.
This is so wrong and fallacious it hurts.
Keff'd.

Town != Infallible.
populartajo wrote:Surye, you belong to another scum faction, right?
Where'd this come from?

I agree with Nat that Surye feels a little off lately. Since he isnt confirmed I think someone would like to fireflower him.

Surye · Post Post #2418 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:40 am

populartajo wrote:
somestrangeflea wrote:
Surye wrote:
Lord Gurgi wrote:I don't see why the mod-confirmed toad needs to explain anything.
This is so wrong and fallacious it hurts.
Keff'd.

Town != Infallible.
populartajo wrote:Surye, you belong to another scum faction, right?
Where'd this come from?
I agree with Nat that Surye feels a little off lately. Since he isnt confirmed I think someone would like to fireflower him.

Off from what? You're proposing I am killed without a single vote on me?

This came out of no where at all.

populartajo · Post Post #2419 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:46 am

I think fireflowing will be the best solution to win this game. Sadly, the majority of People not confirmed will have to die. Do you agree?

Surye · Post Post #2420 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 am

populartajo wrote:I think fireflowing will be the best solution to win this game. Sadly, the majority of People not confirmed will have to die. Do you agree?

You ignored my question, off from what? I don't agree, and even if I did, should we not start with people of actual suspect? Or am I on your suspect list?

populartajo · Post Post #2421 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:54 am

Surye wrote:
populartajo wrote:I think fireflowing will be the best solution to win this game. Sadly, the majority of People not confirmed will have to die. Do you agree?
You ignored my question, off from what? I don't agree, and even if I did, should we not start with people of actual suspect? Or am I on your suspect list?

Surye what about if you claim and we stop this argument right now...

Cream147 · Post Post #2422 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:00 am

I don't quite get what Popular is on lately...for the last 30-40 pages that is. Not that I would mind Surye claiming, but I don't see any real need for it...

populartajo · Post Post #2423 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:04 am

Cream147 wrote:I don't quite get what Popular is on lately...for the last 30-40 pages that is. Not that I would mind Surye claiming, but I don't see any real need for it...

I already shared my plan. I havent seen anyone objecting to it. We fireflower non confirmed players, specially suspected ones, aka Mnowax, Ting, Ala, Natirasha and lately Surye.
Since we have many confirmed Toads we can trust them to fireflower this group and tomorrow we have at least one or two scum in this group. Pretty sure. We do the same thing we're doing today, trying to stablish links, know more roles, etc, etc.
Now that I remember I think Ting should also claim.
Thoughts?

Cream147 · Post Post #2424 (ISO) » Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:20 am

populartajo wrote:
Cream147 wrote:I don't quite get what Popular is on lately...for the last 30-40 pages that is. Not that I would mind Surye claiming, but I don't see any real need for it...
I already shared my plan. I havent seen anyone objecting to it. We fireflower non confirmed players, specially suspected ones, aka Mnowax, Ting, Ala, Natirasha and lately Surye.
Since we have many confirmed Toads we can trust them to fireflower this group and tomorrow we have at least one or two scum in this group. Pretty sure. We do the same thing we're doing today, trying to stablish links, know more roles, etc, etc.
Now that I remember I think Ting should also claim.
Thoughts?

How many people really suspect Surye? 2? I agree with the plan otherwise. Oh, and you never did answer Mnowax's question. He doesn't know why he should be claiming (though I think he should figure it out from this post)

(P.S. I'll be happy to fireflower the fake Toad, Natirasha)