Mushroom Kingdom Mafia (Game over!)

forbiddanlight · Post Post #2525 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:48 am

Kay guys you convinced me. I never said Alabaska couldn't be scum but I dont think his lynch is optimal taking in count we can test his claim in many was.
However, I can see the links (heh, I even brought them to the table)
and he's extremely related to Bowser's army. The only thing that worries me is that he sincerely pushed Korts lynch.
But hey this is a democracy.
So. We lynch him instead of killing him tonight since if he's Bowser then he's pretty much unkillable. Unvote Vote : Alabaska J.
We fireflower mnowax tonight. Cream?
We fireflower skitzer. Forbiddan light?
We fireflower Nat. Gremwell?
Agreed?

Fair nuff. I will fire flower skitzer, and I will

Unvote, vote Alabaska

. I would like to hold on FFing mnowax. Hopefully he'll full claim before we have to.

Mod edit
Visible Votecount:
Alabaska J (8): farside22, Lord Gurgi, Natirasha, DarlaBlueEyes, mnowax, populartajo, Surye, forbiddanlight
skitzer (1): Cream147
Natirasha (1): Alabaska J
ting =) (1): Riceballtail
Cream147 (1): ting =)

Not voting (5): skitzer, killa seven, Gremwell, ashmite84, somestrangeflea

With 17 alive it takes 9 real votes to lynch.

populartajo · Post Post #2526 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:48 am

Flowervote: mnowax.
Flowervote: Nat.
Flowervote: skitzer.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #2527 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:50 am

Alright, then

Flowervote Skitzer
Flowervote: Nat

Cream147 · Post Post #2528 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:11 am

populartajo wrote:
Cream147 wrote:
forbiddanlight wrote:
on the whole topic of poisonous shrooms, K7 shouldn't use the shroom he was given, he should buy his own.
Oh hell, awesome catch. Just cause goborage/mnowax admitted their's does NOT mean that others can't have them. Good call.
WHAT?! When will I at last have the trust I deserve!
Poor Cream. No need in buying another mushroom. Just make K7 give it back to you as a
poisonous mushroom
. If the transaction fails, then he has a healthy one.

You really are starting to make sense you know! First this, then deciding we should just lynch Alabaska.

Cream147 · Post Post #2529 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:13 am

Ok

Flowervote: Skitzer
Flowervote: Nat

If we want to let mnowax get off with possession of poison, then I don't know what has happened to our law enforcement, but I'll go with it.

forbiddanlight · Post Post #2530 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:21 am

If we want to let mnowax get off with possession of poison, then I don't know what has happened to our law enforcement, but I'll go with it.

We aren't yet. My vote pends on a claim. I think a lot of ours do.

Surye · Post Post #2531 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:27 am

Plus, I don't think that FF 3 people is a good move, we should see what stands where after the lynch + 2 FFs. Nat and Skitzer seem to be the favorites among the active people.

farside22 · Post Post #2532 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:44 am

I agree with this:

Flowervote: mnowax.
Flowervote: Nat.
Flowervote: skitzer.

populartajo · Post Post #2533 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:21 am

Forbiddan can you unvote Alabaska? I dont want the day to end yet.
@Surye and FL. Mnowax claimed Toad. Do you have an explanation of why a vanilla version of this game has a POISONOUS MUSHROOM?

forbiddanlight · Post Post #2534 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:22 am

Forbiddan can you unvote Alabaska? I dont want the day to end yet.

Shit, I didn't hammer did I!?

unvote Alabaska

farside22 · Post Post #2535 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:23 am

populartajo wrote:Forbiddan can you unvote Alabaska? I dont want the day to end yet.
@Surye and FL. Mnowax claimed Toad. Do you have an explanation of why a vanilla version of this game has a POISONOUS MUSHROOM?

I can't imagine a Toad with a Poisonous Mushroom. Like I said I think there might be something that maybe all toads got different when it comes to the mushroom which is why Nat is not as suspicious, but a poisonous mushroom in a Toad's hand does not seem vanilla to me.

Surye · Post Post #2536 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:55 am

farside22 wrote:
populartajo wrote:Forbiddan can you unvote Alabaska? I dont want the day to end yet.
@Surye and FL. Mnowax claimed Toad. Do you have an explanation of why a vanilla version of this game has a POISONOUS MUSHROOM?
I can't imagine a Toad with a Poisonous Mushroom. Like I said I think there might be something that maybe all toads got different when it comes to the mushroom which is why Nat is not as suspicious, but a poisonous mushroom in a Toad's hand does not seem vanilla to me.

My thoughts are pretty much in line with my opinions.

Surye · Post Post #2537 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:56 am

This post is pretty much in line with my opinions*

That's what I get for multitasking too much.

populartajo · Post Post #2538 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:08 am

Surye, why did you disagree with a mnowax kill then?
Also I dont one no one hammering Alabaska until he gives all his coins to the town. Ive heard he has a lot.

Surye · Post Post #2539 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:35 am

populartajo wrote:Surye, why did you disagree with a mnowax kill then?
Also I dont one no one hammering Alabaska until he gives all his coins to the town. Ive heard he has a lot.

I didn't disagree with his kill, I disagree with too many kills in one night with no feedback and discussion between kills.

Gremwell · Post Post #2540 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:57 am

So I'm hitting Nat tonight, correct?

populartajo · Post Post #2541 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:25 am

Gremwell wrote:So I'm hitting Nat tonight, correct?

Yep. Can you give me that extra coin?
And Surye, I totally disagree. With 3 players dead we have confirmation of 3 players allignment. Therefore we know a)people that were town and that were easy targets. b)people that were scum and that have scumpartners ready to be suspected.

Surye · Post Post #2542 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:15 am

populartajo wrote:
Gremwell wrote:So I'm hitting Nat tonight, correct?
Yep. Can you give me that extra coin?
And Surye, I totally disagree. With 3 players dead we have confirmation of 3 players allignment. Therefore we know a)people that were town and that were easy targets. b)people that were scum and that have scumpartners ready to be suspected.

I don't think your stratagy is wrong, it's just more bullish, and mine is more bearish. Honestly they will probably accomplish the same thing, maybe with just a few more townie deaths. But considering how good we've been hitting scum targets, I think we can afford it. So I'm willing to stand behind the three if everyone agrees.

Natirasha · Post Post #2543 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:39 am

Flowervote: Nat.

Although, if my suspicions are correct, your losing a source of major coinage.

populartajo · Post Post #2544 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:48 pm

Natirasha wrote:
Flowervote: Nat.

Although, if my suspicions are correct, your losing a source of major coinage.

Maybe we should let this goon live for one more day.

killa seven · Post Post #2545 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:42 pm

i agree with the flower choices tonight.

I know FL is town so i would like her to get a fireflower tonight.

Alabaska J · Post Post #2546 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:43 pm

SURYE WHY ARE YOU PUSHING MY LYNCH SO HARD WITH SO LITTLE EVIDENCE IT IS NOT LIKE YOU.

RL pwns me for a few days and now I'm about to be hammered?????????? what is this.

I have basically claimed doc. There is a phantom link between armlx and me. There is some outguessing the mod. There is me

rightfully

defending iamausername (even though he was scum). And I am the one about to be lynched. Natirasha has changed her role claim over 9000 times and Lord Gurgi is voting me probably only because he doesn't like me in GD and the title fairy thread.

Town you have better lynches today.

This is extremely frustrating.

Lord Gurgi · Post Post #2547 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:44 pm

I don't bring in outside grudges, I just don't find your titles very funny. I usually do just pick a scum by gut and run with it.

Alabaska J · Post Post #2548 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:50 pm

Oh and one more thing I saw pop bring up.

Korts was scum, and I pushed for his lynch

hard

even when the rest of the town didn't feel me on him. He came out scum. How is

that

not a town-tell? I know you guys will WIFOM it all to hell saying it was a bus but if

that

was a bus than anyone lynching anyone for any reason (hell even an un-cc'd cop report) could be called a bus and get them lynched the next day.

This town is playing rather poorly, especially it's confirmed. Gurgi has tunneled on me and pop is giving in to him and noobs/scum following him.

I strongly believe Surye to be scum based on his stance and my past experiences with him. In fact,

unvote, vote: Surye

my scumdar is on him much greater than Nat's botched claims right now.

ting =) · Post Post #2549 (ISO) » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:50 pm

tajo wrote:@ting: Notice that Im not pushing your lynch anymore. Notice that Ive realized that Nat could be a viable lynch since he isnt totally confirmed. Thats what a reread do. Ill do what the majority says. Im just giving ideas and I could be wrong.

But you are calling me suspicious, and also calling for me to claim. I'm sorry if I sound more heated than I meant to be, but both bug me since I haven't been given any reason for either.

--

fl wrote:Actually. Peach (as well as scum) would have to all but claim toad unless they have good fakeclaims. But Nat has been getting an interestingly high amount of coins and such, so, I'm kinda wondering what's going on here. Also, I'm WIFOMing more than myself. Should be interesting to see the results.

That's one of my points - there was no need for Nat to have claimed

at all.

It came completely unprompted, and was just a 'yeah, me too!' following farside. And if you knew you were going to end up wifom-ing everyone, why bring it up to begin with? What results are you expecting? Do you think there's anything to gain?

Also,

flowervote:Nat, Mnowax.