129, 133, 145, 186, 207, 291, 413, 551, 835.In post 1702, Cheetory6 wrote:Can you pull posts that you feel look like genuine scumhunting from Jake's ISO?
In post 1722, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:the scum team spent approximately 500 posts complaining to cakez about how incredibly townsided the setup was
...Yes, pretty much. I can take a look at his catchup, if you'd like.In post 1712, midwaybear wrote:So did everybody just ignore PrivateI?
I don't think it was townsided ftr. Is this just because you got in the incredibly unlikely situation of almost having to deal with the thread confirm?In post 1722, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:the scum team spent approximately 500 posts complaining to cakez about how incredibly townsided the setup was
Neither have I.In post 1724, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I've literally never been wrong on a soul-read in my life
This is at me? You don't think the Jake posts are scumhunting?In post 1727, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i clicked on each of these posts and am now even more confused about what you are talking about.
Eh. This conversation is probably better served in the Tenet thread.In post 1729, Something_Smart wrote:I don't think it was townsided ftr. Is this just because you got in the incredibly unlikely situation of almost having to deal with the thread confirm?In post 1722, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:the scum team spent approximately 500 posts complaining to cakez about how incredibly townsided the setup was
In post 1729, Something_Smart wrote:I don't think it was townsided ftr. Is this just because you got in the incredibly unlikely situation of almost having to deal with the thread confirm?In post 1722, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:the scum team spent approximately 500 posts complaining to cakez about how incredibly townsided the setup was
In post 1725, Something_Smart wrote:129, 133, 145, 186, 207, 291, 413, 551, 835.In post 1702, Cheetory6 wrote:Can you pull posts that you feel look like genuine scumhunting from Jake's ISO?
Note that I don't townread Jake because his scumhunting looks genuine. I don't think that these posts can't come from scum. But I think the accusation that he hasn't scumhunted is pretty off-base.
In post 1687, Cheetory6 wrote:So Jake's engagement this game doesn't feel survivalistic to you without the much needed added component of genuine scumhunting going along with it?
Because to me it seems like Jake was only active in response to the wagon and the actual substance of their votes/scumreads is kind of just not really there.
The drop in activity afterwards really does nothing to affect the reading of the early on reaction?
In post 1700, Something_Smart wrote:It seems like he's scumhunting just fine to me.In post 1687, Cheetory6 wrote:So Jake's engagement this game doesn't feel survivalistic to you without the much needed added component of genuine scumhunting going along with it?
Of course it's survivalistic, but that's not a bad thing. He's clearly been mis-exed before and is wary of it happening again.
In post 1702, Cheetory6 wrote:Can you pull posts that you feel look like genuine scumhunting from Jake's ISO?
And this is townie because...In post 1657, Something_Smart wrote:Dude was making casual quips about how he was definitely going to get mis-exed. And despite being self-professed LHF he has bit back significantly when challenged.
He's not even posting anymore. Look at his most recent posts and tell me how you feel about him.In post 1738, Something_Smart wrote:He doesn't seem scared of messing up; he's not playing like he has a lot to lose, and he's also not trying to placate people or dodge suspicion.
I'm not; I said that I don't think it's especially genuine-looking, but that doesn't mean it isn't genuine. It is reasonable enough that I have no reason to believe that it isn't genuine, which means I'm not concerned about it.In post 1739, Cheetory6 wrote:I mean it feels like you're ignoring the "genuine" part of what I said?
I mean, that's fair. That's kind of how I interpreted your claim, since it's not like we can know for sure whether scumhunting is genuine or not.In post 1739, Cheetory6 wrote:If I had said "Jake has not even pretended to scumhunt" I could get the argument you're making for how this is a misrep but it feels like you dodged the entire point of the question and linked me every question Jake's asked in the thread. q_q
S_S, I'd like to see your response to this, particularly the bold.In post 1741, midwaybear wrote:In post 1738, Something_Smart wrote:He doesn't seem scared of messing up; he's not playing like he has a lot to lose, and he's also not trying to placate people or dodge suspicion.He's not even posting anymore.Look at his most recent posts and tell me how you feel about him.
I don't really think what you said means much. You can just tack those on to most LHF-style player.
1. is this read on me not directly contradictory with your position here?In post 1622, Spring Breeze wrote: - spf; my teammate infinity says he mindmelds with her a lot, and i agree she's had good takes, but i don't think she's towntold enough for a townread. this maria post (1209) still pings me; i still think is too logic leapy, and she expresses a townread on mariar for it which i think is unwarranted. i don't *think* i'm misunderstanding the point, or at least am too far off
- jake is lhf, but should absolutely not be townread by any stretch of the imagination
- gypx, i think is town. he's low effort solving, but still solving
- pink ball, i'm pretty self conscious that i'm an attractive push for scum, but i don't think i can in good faith call that a scum push. otherwise content is a lot of asking questions and short comments which is pretty null.
you characterize me as town because my "deductions have been good", but in this post, you're saying that the deductions i've posted haven't been towny enough to warrant a townread. ....so, which one is it?In post 536, Spring Breeze wrote:i really like spf so far; her deductions have been really good. unless i need to rethink, i think she's just town. agree with the noraa read and jake read.
i agreed with this 72 hours ago, but jake has deflated to a ridiculous extent within the past couple of days. i don't know why that is, but it seems odd to bring up jake's ~genuine~ solving without also bringing up the fact that he hasn't solved for several real life days nowIn post 1742, Something_Smart wrote:I'm not; I said that I don't think it's especially genuine-looking, but that doesn't mean it isn't genuine. It is reasonable enough that I have no reason to believe that it isn't genuine, which means I'm not concerned about it.In post 1739, Cheetory6 wrote:I mean it feels like you're ignoring the "genuine" part of what I said?
what did you think about his catch-up?In post 1712, midwaybear wrote:So did everybody just ignore PrivateI?
My bad, I genuinely missed PrivateI's post. Apologies PrivateI. It was between my final post at the end of the day before going to sleep and the back and forth between Jake and Gypyx so it got lost in there somewhere for me. And it didn't look big either because of the expand spoiler thing. I'll have a look in a bit.In post 1712, midwaybear wrote:So did everybody just ignore PrivateI?
I'm aware of it. I don't think it's notable. The instinct to not attract any more attention as scum is probably balanced by the fear of people moving back to him.In post 1744, Jingle wrote:S_S, I'd like to see your response to this, particularly the bold.