PB's case painted a pretty solid picture of you trying to present as a normal townie evaluating the game while not really doing much actual solving. Your response to PB's case was to argue with the facts, not the reasoning, but also to assume that he's trying to spin things to discredit you (why did you assume that? surely if he was town it was in good faith even if his characterizations weren't accurate). You later dropped this read with essentially no explanation beyond "I wasn't thinking straight" which, even if true, is surely not all you can say on the matter if you're town (and it's also the easiest thing in the world to say as scum if you've decided that you can't counterpush PB and get away with it)... and it's also not all you can say on PB.In post 2654, Spring Breeze wrote:why do you think i'm scum?
Then you softed and held the thread hostage while you wrote up some posts which felt like mostly minor responses to things and a readlist that's mostly just the playerlist sorted by activity with a few exceptions (PB, Murder, Jingle). And then you not only claimed a weak role that doesn't match with your soft, but you indicated that you knew it was a weak role, and didn't say anything about why you softed a strong one.
