Open 88 - Polygamist Mafia (Game Over) before 650

[Xtoxm]

Vote Count

Farside22 (2) Adel, Empking
Empking (0)
Goatrevolt (1) armlx
Jahudo (0)
Jenethron (0)
armlx (1) Goat
Caboose (0)
Mana_Ku (0)
kloud1516 (0)
Adel (0)

Not Voting (6) Mana_Ku, Jenethron, Jahudo, Farside22, Caboose, Kloud

With 10 alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.

[Empking]

If the mod doesn't want us to do it, I don't think we should do it.

[Xtoxm]

The next person to claim how many posts were in the QuickTopic gets modkilled. You can paraphrase what was said, but don't quote it. Claiming the exact number of posts you made is close to quoting what was said, so I'm serious about this.

This rule was instated by the mod when I played Polygamist Mafia Open 76. I shall like to instate it here also. Word for word.

I've added this to the first page.

Carry on

[farside22]

The next person to claim how many posts were in the QuickTopic gets modkilled. You can paraphrase what was said, but don't quote it. Claiming the exact number of posts you made is close to quoting what was said, so I'm serious about this.

This rule was instated by the mod when I played Polygamist Mafia Open 76. I shall like to instate it here also. Word for word.

Fair enough.
So paraphrase your quicktopic. Like I said though each lover should claim what it is they said in the topic.
Any other objection?

[Adel]

no object here. I think Empyking should post his first. He is online, and scummy as hell.

[Mana_Ku]

Empking, go ahead.
Farside, here speaks Adel's lover. Just saying as we're having a relation since August 25th. I cheared him up after 3fj decided not to say a thing after his lover dumped him. It's a pleasure to meet you.

[Goatrevolt]

I don't foresee this being a huge help in catching scum, but I don't see any actual downsides, so it's definitely worth a shot. Part of me feels that this goes against the spirit of the game, but I can save that discussion until post-game.

How do we want to handle the issue of replacements who were not actually around for the pre-game discussion? I can see pros and cons to having the replacements post the chats as well as players who have been here all game. Thoughts?

[farside22]

I don't foresee this being a huge help in catching scum, but I don't see any actual downsides, so it's definitely worth a shot. Part of me feels that this goes against the spirit of the game, but I can save that discussion until post-game.

How do we want to handle the issue of replacements who were not actually around for the pre-game discussion? I can see pros and cons to having the replacements post the chats as well as players who have been here all game. Thoughts?

How this helps:
By having the person state what they said during the quick topics time can verify a few things and may catch scum slipping up to make something up.
Replacements can't answer why what was said, but them paraphrasing for the person they replaced can help too.
Manu sorry didn't realize you were Adel's lover. I am now fully informed.

[Goatrevolt]

How this helps:
By having the person state what they said during the quick topics time can verify a few things and may catch scum slipping up to make something up.
Replacements can't answer why what was said, but them paraphrasing for the person they replaced can help too.
Manu sorry didn't realize you were Adel's lover. I am now fully informed.

Aye. It can only help us.

Empking can go ahead and paraphrase my pre-chat with Llama. After that, I want armlx to go next.

[Jahudo]

You can't rule out Coug because he's town. Town doesn't mean he wouldn't have hammered, unless you think scum are the ones who exclusively place hammer votes.

His suspicions on Adel were limited to the OMGUS on armix. He was more interested in armix and Empking so what I'm saying is that it would take more time and posting by Coug to justify a hammer by him. I feel that farside, Goat, and I were in the same situation in that regard. This could be interpreted as a safety net by the other scum pair IF Adel/Mana are scum.

In my opinion this makes me wonder if Adel/Mana are scum a little more than I thought yesterday; but in the difficulty of deciding the other pair of Adel/Mana, I'll focus on the other pair without linking to Adel/Mana. I'll look at Caboose/Farside with Goat/Emp first.

By having the person state what they said during the quick topics time can verify a few things and may catch scum slipping up to make something up.

I don't see how this helps, given anyone can fake a quick topic to fit how they played after the fact. I also feel that this is a diversion from the actual game and won't help us as much as analyzing the game posts.

[farside22]

By having the person state what they said during the quick topics time can verify a few things and may catch scum slipping up to make something up.

I don't see how this helps, given anyone can fake a quick topic to fit how they played after the fact. I also feel that this is a diversion from the actual game and won't help us as much as analyzing the game posts.

The scum need to be very creative to do this. Heck I'm even willing to go first. I think if Goat's partner doesn't show up soon Goat should just go first. I'm fine with Armlx or myself. I don't care, but give it a shot. It's better then the random lynch that Jebus was talking about yesterday.

[armlx]

Adel already made her comments in thread. You didn't object or have issues then.

Again, the mod didn't have any issue with it at the time.

[Empking]

I only post what Llama wrote don't I.

Post 1 - Saying they're a good lover pair
Post 3 - Saying they isn't much to discuss
Post 5 - Saying they're are quite a few new players

I think Caboose should claim next as his partner has the most votes.

[armlx]

Emp.... you kinda just broke this rule

The next person to claim how many posts were in the QuickTopic gets modkilled. You can paraphrase what was said, but don't quote it. Claiming the exact number of posts you made is close to quoting what was said, so I'm serious about this.

I assume this means we will see if I was right about Goat soon.

[Mana_Ku]

Does he get modkilled by this?
I can understand though, but this would mean another replacement, right?
So actually, he should have said:

Llama talked about this perfect couple. Also he and his lover didn't see a thing to discuss. Their last post mentioned the new players.

Something like this would have been correct right?

[armlx]

Yeah, that would have been correct Mana Ku.

Also, why would it mean replacement over straight up kill?

[Mana_Ku]

But that ruins the game for us doesn't it?
Empking gets killed, meaning goat commits suicide. Either we lost or we won is decided by a modkill. Or am I thinking wrong here?

[armlx]

No, that's pretty much what is going to happen.

[Mana_Ku]

That's why I want someone to replace. I'm enjoying this game and I don't want it to end yet.

[Goatrevolt]

Well, it's not necessarily a rule break, as nobody knows how many posts I have after Llama's last post in that thread.

At least, I'm going to hope this isn't a modkill.

Also, if this doesn't end the game, I vote we stop. I don't want the game to be decided by something like a modkill.

[Mana_Ku]

That's why I want to have a replacement if this would mean a modkill.
This could lead otherwise to the first loss of Adel in these types of games.

But I hope, our mod, the fantastic xtoxm (does it work to say sweet things to you, mod?) doesn't see this as a rule break.

[Empking]

That's not all that was said. It was just that Llama and Goats we're talking about things unrelated to the game after that.

[armlx]

That's why I want to have a replacement if this would mean a modkill.

Replacing Emp doesn't fix the issue though.

[Empking]

It says how many posts was in the quiktopic not how many you posted.

[Mana_Ku]

You know, I'll just leave this issue to xtoxm, our fantastic mod who always has the best solutions. He decides if Empking broke the rule or not.
If he broke the rule, I hope the others can continue this game though. If it would stop now, this game would have a weak ending which it doesn't deserve.