Open 88 - Polygamist Mafia (Game Over) before 650

[Empking]

Uh I'm sorry but

Pairs

should claim.

Its idiotic to give 1 pair two popcorns and 1 pair no popcorns.

I know what popcorning is but what Farside did was just passing the buck.

[farside22]

Uh I'm sorry but

Pairs

should claim.

Its idiotic to give 1 pair two popcorns and 1 pair no popcorns.

I know what popcorning is but what Farside did was just passing the buck.

Care to explain how I passed the buck because if I remember correctly Llama's replacement talked about their talks, but Goat never said a word. Someone stated I should say what me and my lover talked about and I did. I think Goat should have talked about what him and his lover talked about next, but someone wanted Caboose to go next. So explain how I passed the buck?

[Empking]

Simple, Goat had to c;laim as soon as he was able. You choosing Goat changed nothing apart from making it so goat chose who goes next.

That's how you passed the buck.

[farside22]

Simple, Goat had to c;laim as soon as he was able. You choosing Goat changed nothing apart from making it so goat chose who goes next.

That's how you passed the buck.

I didn't see goat's claim.

[farside22]

Simple, Goat had to c;laim as soon as he was able. You choosing Goat changed nothing apart from making it so goat chose who goes next.

That's how you passed the buck.

I didn't see goat's claim.

Just read back. Goat did not claim chat talks only his partner did.

By the way if you ever play a game with Llama you would understand what I mean by that conversation seeming bland.

[Mana_Ku]

Farside is right here. Goat didn't tell anything about his chat with Llama.
Meaning goat is next to claim.

[Empking]

Please point out where I said Goat claimed.

Oh yes, you're strawmanning. The worst strawman I have ever seen.

Mana Ku and Farside are scum together after all.

[Mana_Ku]

The point is that you said that

Pairs

should claim. However, you say this after Caboose and Farside have claimed. Now we go back to Goat and your accusing me and farside about strawmanning and being scum partners.
Besides, I only said that Goat hadn't claimed and that he should be next. Where is the strawman?

[farside22]

The point is that you said that

Pairs

should claim. However, you say this after Caboose and Farside have claimed. Now we go back to Goat and your accusing me and farside about strawmanning and being scum partners.
Besides, I only said that Goat hadn't claimed and that he should be next. Where is the strawman?

QFT. I didn't see us as doing pair and I would like Goat to state the conversation.
If I pick again then I will say Armlx should go next, but I still think Goat needs to chime in.

[armlx]

Uhh, yeah, what mana ku said.

The level of OMGUS is unreal from Emp. I like my vote where it is.

[Empking]

I'm sorry but I was already voting for them before they voted or attacked me. So where's the OMGUS?

Mana Ku: You said I said Goat had claimed. Where did I say that? You're a liar who's pretending I said Goats had already claimed.

[armlx]

Instead of reasoning their points, you are misrepresenting and attacking them. That's why its OMGUS.

[Mana_Ku]

Empking, point it out where I said that you said that Goat had claimed.

[Empking]

Instead of reasoning their points, you are misrepresenting and attacking them. That's why its OMGUS.

That's not OMGUS.

[Empking]

Simple, Goat had to c;laim as soon as he was able. You choosing Goat changed nothing apart from making it so goat chose who goes next.

That's how you passed the buck.

I didn't see goat's claim.

Farside is right here. Goat didn't tell anything about his chat with Llama.
Meaning goat is next to claim.

This obviously suggests that Farside is saying that I said Goats claimed and you're saying Farside is right.

[farside22]

Simple, Goat had to c;laim as soon as he was able. You choosing Goat changed nothing apart from making it so goat chose who goes next.

That's how you passed the buck.

I didn't see goat's claim.

Farside is right here. Goat didn't tell anything about his chat with Llama.
Meaning goat is next to claim.

This obviously suggests that Farside is saying that I said Goats claimed and you're saying Farside is right.

Just an FYI in case you don't know. If you hit profile you can see someone has been posting around and Goat is around should have posted his comments by now.

[Mana_Ku]

What I'm saying with farside is right is that there was no claim from Goat. Only yours. Afterwards you say that Caboose should claim. Next was Farside's claim. She says that she wants to hear Goat's claim.
But then come you back saying that only

pairs

should claim. However, your pair hasn't claimed fully yet. Farside also never said that you said that Goat had claimed. She only said that she didn't saw Goat's claim.
But why should every pair claim in pairs, but not yours?

[Empking]

They should all claim in pairs. The fact that pairs (especialy my own)should be considered one group for claims that's my whole argument.

Mana ku: Are you saying that Farside said she "didn't see Goat's claim" randomly?

[Mana_Ku]

No, she saw your post about the pairs who should claim as pairs and I believe that she said it due to that comment. She saw your claim, but not Goat's. However, you want us to claim in pairs. That's why I think that she said it based on that post.

[Empking]

So isn't that her saying that I said Goat claimed?

[Mana_Ku]

No, it's giving a comment. You want all pairs to claim after eachother, while you asked if Caboose woulc claim. You're saying one thing, but you don't do it yourself. Besides, Goat just posted somewhere. He can claim now.

[Goatrevolt]

I'll read through all the bickering later, but the general consensus is that I need to claim my portion of that chat?

Basically it went something like this grossly paraphrased:

Llama: Yo Goat, what's up, this should be a good team.
Goat: Definitely. We were good last time as town together.
Llama: Never played this game, not sure what to talk about.
Goat: Nor have I. I'm guessing the key is to look at lover pairs not individuals.
Llama: Agreed. I don't recognize many of the players.
Goat: I've played with a decent number of them.
Llama: [Random comments about a different game we played in.]

I'd prefer armlx goes next.

[farside22]

So isn't that her saying that I said Goat claimed?

I wasn't trying to have Goat pick twice. I stated I wanted him to go next to claim. you stating I was strawman is terrible. What is the point of one person claiming if the other does not. Now that Goat has claimed I picked Armlx to claim next. Goat picked the same person it is now a non issue.

God Goat can you get a muzzle for your lover.

[Goatrevolt]

God Goat can you get a muzzle for your lover.

I'm the one on the leash here, sorry.

I don't really see the issue here, to be honest. Empking claimed, picked farside, who claimed, who picked me, I claimed, and now I'll pick armlx to go next. What's the problem?

[Goatrevolt]

Ah, I see. The issue was that farside wanted me to claim, then armlx.

How about this: Armlx claims next, then kloud claims to get the full lover team, and one of those 2 can pick the next claim?