Empking post 46 - I know it's a random vote but what a weird thing to say.
"Vote: Azuma
He's a townsperson."
Post 103: Does knowing that at deadline which is 14 days the person with the most votes is lynched whether we come to a consense make people more nervous to post with a threat of voting for them if they don't post more soon?
RestFermenta post 47 just copies empking's comment. Did I miss this being a new tread?
Moratorium Post 72: For someone who has a reason to vote it seems a little reservse reason to vote. Ah never mind post 122 is more clear. I retract my comment.
Manu - post 80: I disagree with this. Even if someone knows they are being pressured to talk. If they are town then they should talk and stop lurkering. Mafia may speak too knowing that at deadline if they aren't careful they will be lynched.
Cream Post 99: Agreed. Well this should be put with agreed if they want to play to win. Some people are lazy when it comes to posting and playing.
Wall-E post 118, Scum searching is better then lurker lynching. One is more informative then the other.
Megatheory: Post 119 "
A) what akes Wall-E scummy now?
B) How can you be sure he is scum if you always find him scummy?
Just in case you missed my answer:
So I decided to unvote and vote for the Wall-E as a joke vote because if you read his games he has a tendency of being lynched D1 or D2 and so far is town every game. He just comes off scummy.
Surye: Post 163. I got that Sir T was being sarcastic. How did everything else he say deserve a vote with one sarcastic comment?
With all the lurker talks I think seeing the rules about deadline votes might clear people from lurking if they do feel the need to lurk and don't respond to pressure.
-This game has deadlines of ~14 days, with a possible extension of 72 hours (if there are claims, heavy discussion, or recent replacements for example). At deadline, the person with the most votes will be lynched. In case of a tie, I will “go back in time” until the point before there was a tie, to determine who will be lynched.
I hope that by people realizing that a threat of lurking and possible votes will keep lurking null and void at this point. 14 days may seem a lot of time to post something, but it's not if your name is on the chopping block.
Now with that said and reading thru things I just dont' get the Sir T vote. I have no issue with someone asking questions even about a random vote. Also I saw his last vote as sarcastic with a point about empking's comment. Really if you think people should be voting how about pointing out people you think are scummy.
Fos: Empking
So far out of everyone Surye's vote on Sir T looks more like a BW vote then anything else. I don't see why he voted on Sir T as a reason to vote.
unvote:
vote: Surye
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
