Alabaska J wrote:@Megatheory: read Surye's posts defending himself. I agree with him.
That's awfully lazy. If you find me so suspicious that I deserve a vote, why aren't you explaining yourself, pushing me, and trying to figure out if I'm really scum or not?
FoS Alabaska J
Surye wrote:MT wrote:
Your thoughs about Sir T's meta didn't come until after you had unvoted so you can't really use that as an explanation for why you unvoted.
Really? You only get one shot? I'll keep that in mind. Discussions are not necessary, since you only get one post.
The rest of your post hinges on that, so I don't have a response to such nonsense. His meta game supports his non-play.
Since you all are harping on the pretending to play, I assure you that you're all getting tunnel vision no this fact. Look at the post I quoted in the vote. It's pretending to play, 100%. It's participating because he's told to. Now, how much did I invest in this? Did I lead the charge to have him lynched? No. Did I then proceed to follow the discussion on why he would do that, then weigh in, and unvote? Yes.
You're being so ridiculous.
No, you aren't restricted to "one shot," or whatever you're implying here. You're saying that you unvoted him because of his meta, but that isn't really explicit in your unvote post. It looks to me like you grafted his meta onto your reasons for unvoting.
That said, I'm not really convinced that you're scum. There are a few things that caught my attention, but nothing looks scummy enough for me, so
Unvote
for now, but
IGMEOY
.
Sir Tornado wrote:unvote
vote Surye
I hope atleast a few people see what I see.
Oh hell, not this again.
Look, if people aren't going to put reasons behind their votes, we're never going to catch scum. The game is too big for people to not mention what they are seeing.
Shanba wrote:Meh, so be it. I'm not trying to be helpful, I'm trying to prove a point.
I'm glad you recognize that this method is unhelpful.
RestFermata wrote:EBWOP. There's a word for people who don't want to be helpful to the town. I can't think of what it is right now. I believe it starts with an S and ends with an M...
Annoying != scummy. When are people going to finally understand this?
Shanba wrote:...I'm voting Slicey because of his tentative posting.
Hmm.... not really much to comment on. EmpKing looks pretty suspicious right now, I don't like how he was trying to get everyone to vote.
Hmm... BlakAdder looks suspicious to me, mainly cause I feel like he's attacking Sir T for the way he posts, which I don't like.
he's said he's suspicious of EmpKing and Blakadder, but has yet to place a single vote. He explains this by saying: "I don't think one somewhat scummy post automatically makes them scum. And I don't like unvoting and voting like crazy, unless it's the random voting phase", which is fair enough, but that's only part of what I find scummy. So far, he has said "Hmm..." twice, ">_>" (and variants) 4 times. He feels nervous. When he's asking Wall-E why he's voting for him, he adds "Just curious." at the end, as if he's afraid asking will get him into trouble. This might be excusable if he were a newbie, but he's posting meta opinions like:
I don't like unvoting and voting like crazy, unless it's the random voting phase
and
I'd say pressure people that seem scummy. If you think lurking is a scumtactic, well that's what you think. Evetually, they will have to post though, and we'll see if those posts seem scummy
which indicate that he has a certain amount of mafia experience. Compare with my posting in
Basic twelve player mafia, where I was scum. By the end of that game, I was horrifically nervous, and it was showing through in my posts, and the "defeatist" attitude was the reason most of the town had deduced I was scum.
This is a really good case. I got the same general vibe when I caught that unvote and FoS post of his. I'll take a look at him once I"m caught up.
Wow, that Slicey wagon grew incredibly fast. Do we really want to play "lynch the n00b" today?
