with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-06-01 17:15:00).
Last edited by Datisi on Mon May 31, 2021 11:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 880, sang froid wrote:Justify your work. What felt pre-determined and what about my talk about the predecessor was reminiscent of mafia play?
Your conclusions with regards to both me and Sigmund felt like they were made before the catchup and the purpose of the catchup was to justify them. I have noticed players replacing into mafia slots sometimes say their predecessor was very unideal -or- that they were most excellent ('so sad i'm replacing this slot, want to hydra sometime') and players replacing into town slots mostly ignore that their predecessors ever existed. There may be a sample size issue to that but it is something I noted at some point.
Okay, but why? What actually makes them seem like they were pre-determined other than those being my reads? Because it feels like you’re taking “sang froid is pushing me and Sigmund” to mean that I’d already decided on that. (You’re also wildly overestimating how much effort I would put into a fake catchup as scum, but that’s neither here nor there.)
As for the other thing... yes, that’s a terrible metric. I will basically always comment on my predecessor if they posted a reasonable amount of content. Some players always do, some never do, maybe a handful do it more as scum? But this is so weak that it’s hard to buy you really using it as the basis of a read
In post 901, sang froid wrote:Okay, but why? What actually makes them seem like they were pre-determined other than those being my reads?
It didn't feel like your reasoning with regards to me added up to a scumread. It was a post that I provided the context of it not actually being 'solving' by ta vera that I was drawing attention to and otherwise you simply saying things like 'doesn't impress'. Like to me it felt like your conclusion was always going to be 'UneveN is mafia' and that you just included things in the catchup to explain that.
In post 902, UneveN wrote:It didn't feel like your reasoning with regards to me added up to a scumread. It was a post that I provided the context of it not actually being 'solving' by ta vera that I was drawing attention to and otherwise you simply saying things like 'doesn't impress'. Like to me it felt like your conclusion was always going to be 'UneveN is mafia' and that you just included things in the catchup to explain that.
Maybe(?) if I was confident Iconeum was town I would give more credit to the effort put into the catchup? But as it is it felt like much of the effort was a 'progression' with regards to Iconeum and justification for scumreads of me and Sigmund. Or so that is how it feels to me.
In post 427, Andresvmb wrote:Claiming that all of your analysis is going to be surface level is Scummy - I know you can do a lot better than that.
In post 384, Andresvmb wrote:I know, I’m being somewhat vague about how I feel about players but I don’t know that I have much to say yet. For those of you who don’t know me, I’m a bit of a slow starter. And I already know my early reads are bad so there’s that too.
Scum tend to pick out reasons to scumread town based on their own self-awareness in my experience.
Andre accuses Ico of providing excuses for subpar townplay but provided a similar smokescreen himself.
In post 901, sang froid wrote:Okay, but why? What actually makes them seem like they were pre-determined other than those being my reads?
It didn't feel like your reasoning with regards to me added up to a scumread. It was a post that I provided the context of it not actually being 'solving' by ta vera that I was drawing attention to and otherwise you simply saying things like 'doesn't impress'. Like to me it felt like your conclusion was always going to be 'UneveN is mafia' and that you just included things in the catchup to explain that.
I mean again, even if I were scum you’re ascribing such a backwards thought process to what it would make sense for me to do? Like I wouldn’t read through THEN decide, I would just be reading and be like “oh, UneveN sounds weak, I’ll push there” (which, if it were my approach, would also make very little sense with pushing Sigmund at the same time).
I mostly just don’t think you’re trying to solve the game and that you haven’t been throughout and that reads as scummy to me?
That said, I now think you’re maybe town and that I’m the VI this game not moongrass
Maybe town, actually? I felt like the way UneveN addressed me on the last page was very good faith? Sigmund I’ve already explained but I would always vote to eliminate in lylo over any of the top 3 reads
VFP has dropped as a result of the others moving up
S_S isn’t very town at this point by PoE
Andres I still think would have done considerably more by now if town
I’m not sure if I believe in an S_S/Andres team but I guess it’s possible. Not sure if I’m adapting myself too much to thread consensus here/trusting my TRs too much, but it is what it is
I read up. Nothing I especially want to comment on. More mudslinging than I would have liked.
Pretty happy with my previous town core at least for now, though.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!