do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
Given the fact that it seems to be the biggest reason for your scum read on me in a game that's so low jn activity that it's easy to forget about. (Sorry pooky) I would hope that there was actual solid reasoning about this.
Your position around dweelee (or really any other wagon) is like ???
From my perspective, you're reallt the only one who's given me any kind of pass or defense due to activity or posting pattern.
Early game with a defense of what pretty much was an rvs post, and my lack of activity during the week of the 4th literally no body else had any kind of opinion of my inactivity so it kinda sounds like you are looking for any reason to make a push.
Also given that this is your primary reason, i find it ridiculous that you can't even remember your own supporting evidence
In post 674, Menalque wrote:I don’t care if scumslip = good or not bc it wasn’t a scumslip lmao
T3 is sayinf, I think that mafia are the uninformed minority here thus scum is town and town is scum I think
What's the case on VFP?
I'm also inclined to believe that as town (scum) T3 had no reason to give pff that information. If its accurate, we could prevent a town ( scum) sweep.
Its against wincon to claim that as the actual informed minority party
opposing multiballs are usually threats to each other so it's not as clear cut as t3 is making you think. right now t3 is basically plauying like a liberal and trying to buddy with both sides
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
Given the fact that it seems to be the biggest reason for your scum read on me in a game that's so low jn activity that it's easy to forget about. (Sorry pooky) I would hope that there was actual solid reasoning about this.
Your position around dweelee (or really any other wagon) is like ???
From my perspective, you're reallt the only one who's given me any kind of pass or defense due to activity or posting pattern.
Early game with a defense of what pretty much was an rvs post, and my lack of activity during the week of the 4th literally no body else had any kind of opinion of my inactivity so it kinda sounds like you are looking for any reason to make a push.
Also given that this is your primary reason, i find it ridiculous that you can't even remember your own supporting evidence
I'm sorry, what are you talking about? Am I reading wrong, or are you accusing me of both suspecting you
and
giving you a pass for lurking? Especially since I don't think I did either?
I said I wouldn't push you for being V/LA, sure, because I assume we're all decent human beings here who wouldn't abuse that kind of thing for an in-game advantage. But my push on you never had anything to do with your activity - my scumread on you was due to your original case on me being garbage, and due to you not posting anything of notice / interacting with the game / with me once you were out of V/LA. Where are you getting that your inactivity was my "primary reason" for pushing you?
Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.
In post 684, bugspray wrote:opposing multiballs are usually threats to each other so it's not as clear cut as t3 is making you think. right now t3 is basically plauying like a liberal and trying to buddy with both sides
In post 649, Nathann wrote:VFP, what are your current thoughts / reads? Or rather, I find it weird you focused on Dwlee's relations with bugspray when calling them scum, but basically ignored them when reading Menalque.
To add to the above, how many scum do you think there are in this game? Considering they're off E-1, VOTE: VFP
Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.
what if we just yeet t3 out of spite and agree to just no kills tonight
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 691, T3 wrote:don't kill me so I can win a game as 3p
VOTE: t3
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
If T3 isn't lying about his informed this time then there are 2 scums and the setup is
Goon / recruiter
Traitor
Traitor
Goon / recruiter
Traitor
Traitor
Town
Town
Surviver
So my role says to kill all mafia, and this most likely includes Traitor.
Being town isn't the enemy here. The scum teams will be the enemy. Otherwise I would be in a PT with another town with some sort of killing power.
Also the fact of a survivor means it's teams of 4 v 4 v 3 (with T3 being the additional)
So since scum won't be looking for town to shoot, who is claiming to be town here other than me?
And if you're scum that hasn't recruited or a traitor that knows who scum is and not Mena, then I'm not where you want to lim.
Mena is confirmed scum here, and the other scum side took out 1 of Mena's traitors.
Dwlee could be either but I still think Bugs is the other scum.
Me and Bugs are never the 2 town otherwise its wierd to have us both in the hood with Dwlee.
