Here's the results of my reread of the first ten pages, which I did... just now. I'll reread the rest another day. If these 10 pages were all I had, I'd support an alvinz lynch first, and a Coron lynch second.
Unvote, Vote Alvinz
just so my opinion is clear.
Page 1: Mainly DGB-BM banter... nothing real scummy. Small mark on Forbiddan for regretting the night-kill (
Mark grows smaller as I read on, noticing several
other players doing this
)
Page 2: Jex actually knows what she signed up for! (#27) Way-to-conspicuous question from Iron Man in #30; was what I had brought up before. A bunch of
randomness
Page 3: I don't get the purpose of BM's question in #50. Armlx is too serious. I don't see anything that's "feigned ignorance" about Batt's #59. Especially if you notice
people that are showing more "feigned ignorance" than Batt. I think Forbiddan's #65 was actually a real question, and she just hadn't thought about how pointless it
was before she posted. Alvinz's #69 and Batt's #71 aren't bad either, because that stuff wasn't explicitly said in the rules.
Page 4: Useless Iron Man comment (#75). Tar's IIoA vote on Forbiddan (#83) is... odd. I'm thinking he was half-joking. BM's post #88 is incorrect, since as the
game goes on, the scum will base their bomb targets on game information, not on meta. Good post by M4yhem in #91. Max's #94 asks a bunch of questions that
already have been asked, but I think it notes more that he just didn't read the game yet. M4yhem is a good mediator between BM and armlx. (#99)
Page 5: #100 shows Max
definitely
didn't read. Coron's #105 is pure crap. I'm surprised that DoS ignored it. I have no idea why I voted Max in #109 (not
thinking), and I'm not sure how I was home at 1:44 PM Thursday either. #111 is a good post by Haschel. Terrible explanation by Coron in #112. Armlx
AGREES
in #114?! BM is right in #115 and #124.
Page 6: Stupid post by me in #126. BM is still right (wow). Coron backs off of his M4yhem FoS. M4yhem's questioning is good. Coron's #137 actually eases my
suspicion of him slightly, since it shows that his comment was intended to be minuscule. Armlx seems to have a "give the scum no information" outlook. This is kind of
pointless; anytime we post any suspicions, we're giving the scum information. But in the long run, more information will help the town. (Also, by the middle of this
page, the BM/Coron argument is getting rather pointless)
Page 7: Coron's #158 is a good attitude towards lurkers. Between that and M4yhem's #99, that's my opinion. Forbiddan's #160 gives me a town vibe. DGB's
attitude towards bussing makes me laugh (#162), and she does a good job of avoiding tunnel vision. BM continues to own this game, although I disagree in #174 that
a Max-kill is a good idea. Also, you
can
get information from a lurker-lynch, as long as it's not done immediately as the Day dawns. (You know I"ll cite
M4yhem's #99 again)
Page 8: Respone to Armlx's #177: The people who support or oppose the policy lynch is information. Batt's #194 is either a sign of scum or lack-of-interest. DoS's
#198 is okay.
Page 9: I'm surprised Armlx agrees with DoS, since DoS favored killing a lurker, pretty much. What the? Alvinz didn't read the sign-up rules? (#219) Who doesn't
read the sign-up rules when they join a large theme?! I don't know how I missed that post before. First post that I've seen by Twomz (#224)... and he has an
apathetic tone.
Page 10: That is not a contradiction that Armlx pointed out in #225. I agree with most of TSS's opinions in #226, except perhaps the Max-blow-up. I can't say I
agree with IIoA this early in the game, but now I'm surprised Tar still got blown up after #229. BM's post #248 is... stupid.
