In post 189, bnuuy wrote:i feel like redtea is scum because im getting a vibe that scum is in the wisdom-redtea pair and while wisdom is a townread his push against our pair feels suspect but in a way that it may be getting puppet mastered by redtea
In post 191, redtea wrote:And since all the pairs getting claimed was only a matter of time, why would you out this potential strat, ensuring scum wouldn't fall into it?
it did happen, though. check out hockey's ISO and we can talk about it a little bit
Ari being overly trusting of Dunn in the beginning, not showing one single ounce of suspicion, and defending that stance even when others say she ought to.
In mafia? That just doesn't track. That's what I mean by her being informed of Dunn's alignment.
In post 207, bnuuy wrote:i feel like im being punished for actively trying to have a hand in the outcome of this game and its making me want to sink back into being low impact
In post 191, redtea wrote:And since all the pairs getting claimed was only a matter of time, why would you out this potential strat, ensuring scum wouldn't fall into it?
it did happen, though. check out hockey's ISO and we can talk about it a little bit
I think you're missing my point. Your post was nothing better than padding to begin with.
Also where did that happen? Can't find it.
In post 207, bnuuy wrote:i feel like im being punished for actively trying to have a hand in the outcome of this game and its making me want to sink back into being low impact
people were sr'ing you for being low impact don't do that
/not a scum slip
In post 191, redtea wrote:And since all the pairs getting claimed was only a matter of time, why would you out this potential strat, ensuring scum wouldn't fall into it?
it did happen, though. check out hockey's ISO and we can talk about it a little bit
I think you're missing my point. Your post was nothing better than padding to begin with.
Also where did that happen? Can't find it.
read 52 to 78
but yeah mech talk does tend to be padding, unless i'm interpreting your post wrong again?
In post 193, redtea wrote:Dunnstal was mentioned a lot, sure, but in the context of Ari defending her words. Except for the posts made by cow, which kind of took Ari's interactions with Wisdom and ran a marathon with it for some reason.
slightly unrelated note but if one more person IIT calls my play shit i'm going to start sulking
In post 210, redtea wrote:that makes. No sense. At all. "Optimal mech play" is usually entirely different depending on your alignment. Literally what are you talking about.
in an open setup, optimal mech play is usually common knowledge so there is no incentive for scum players to lie about what the optimal mech play is.
Optimal mech play is not dependent upon alignment because it would be stupid for scum to present a suboptimal mech play in hopes of fooling the town.
In post 222, Wisdom wrote:Then why are we talking about hockey calling your lover pair s/s in the context of a scum strat
because redtea believes that me outting a strategy is bad play (in hindsight, it was. bad habit of mine) and that i didn't catch anyone with it (i did, hockey)
selling fuit gummy at an affordable price