336- idt N_M comes back to thread with a read that hant been discussed in thread yet. Like the read was pretty far out there, and idt scum!N_M does that
In post 375, HockeyFan wrote:The meta being that I think N_M tried harder as scum.
Can you provide evidence for this meta-read?
Uh not really specific games, sorry. Like im talking about generally in all games N_M plays he has his signature opening, then makes a bunch of meme/filler posts/everyso often a read. However, I would think he tries a bit harder as scum since hes a LHF and easy limbait for scum.
336- idt N_M comes back to thread with a read that hant been discussed in thread yet. Like the read was pretty far out there, and idt scum!N_M does that
thats pretty out there
this sounds like scum self-preservation ngl
336- idt N_M comes back to thread with a read that hant been discussed in thread yet. Like the read was pretty far out there, and idt scum!N_M does that
thats pretty out there
this sounds like scum self-preservation ngl
In post 375, HockeyFan wrote:The meta being that I think N_M tried harder as scum.
Can you provide evidence for this meta-read?
Uh not really specific games, sorry. Like im talking about generally in all games N_M plays he has his signature opening, then makes a bunch of meme/filler posts/everyso often a read.
However, I would think he tries a bit harder as scum since hes a LHF and easy limbait for scum.
no i'm not sure i get this, i got the opposite impression when i looked at their games. at the very least it's NAI and you should look at something else
In post 373, HockeyFan wrote:wait lol, 1 thing, i tr mine/NM pair and cows/dunnstral pairs so do we just win after we condemm bnnuy/ari and wisdom/redtea lol? I mean those 4 have some sort of consenus pressure so idk why anyone would be opposed to that(im aware current wagon is on Dorsey but eh)
im assuming dorsey is some sort of typo
as ive said already i trust your pair the most to go into endgame so as long as me-ari, wisdom-redtea, and dunn-cowslove go in any order im amenable to whatever
“Merely by existing, we hurt each other.
But it’s not always intentional.”
In post 375, HockeyFan wrote:The meta being that I think N_M tried harder as scum.
Can you provide evidence for this meta-read?
Uh not really specific games, sorry. Like im talking about generally in all games N_M plays he has his signature opening, then makes a bunch of meme/filler posts/everyso often a read.
However, I would think he tries a bit harder as scum since hes a LHF and easy limbait for scum.
no i'm not sure i get this, i got the opposite impression when i looked at their games. at the very least it's NAI and you should look at something else
lemme figure out how to link ISOs real quick
Sure, my bolded thing may be a bit of an exaggeration, w/e, i still think scum is in other pairs. What else am i supposed to look at btw
@hockey if i dont trust there is a playstyle alignement indicator here myself and it's a weak one even for you, why would I be talking about that. I'm talking about content. Apparently, according to cows, that takes some time, but I'll wait.
And I am not content to sit and let me or Wisdom be limmed today or tomorrow, not with what info and reads I have.
[quote="In post 391, redtea"]@hockey if i dont trust there is a playstyle alignement indicator here myself and it's a weak one even for you, why would I be talking about that. I'm talking about content. Apparently, according to cows, that takes some time, but I'll wait.
And I am not content to sit and let me or Wisdom be limmed today or tomorrow,
In post 62, HockeyFan wrote:Fluffy is something postivie, so is the word "soft". It portrays a "happyish mood". This disucsiion is based on semantics over a read I had thats not even that strong(I said it was tonal/gut)and I think its pointless.
also i reread the game a little and this post is really funny
not because of the content itself
i feel this sense of stubbornness from it, like hockey was asked a question that he didn't exactly know how to answer with what he's ACTUALLY thinking so he takes it at face value so that he could give off the impression that his stances are perfectly sound without wasting too much time
god typing it out like this makes me feel like i'm going mad but maybe if i provide enough examples people can find a pattern off of them
In post 395, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:i feel this sense of stubbornness from it, like hockey was asked a question that he didn't exactly know how to answer with what he's ACTUALLY thinking so he takes it at face value so that he could give off the impression that his stances are perfectly sound without wasting too much time
Apparently, according to cows, that takes some time, but I'll wait.
And I am not content to sit and let me or Wisdom be limmed today or tomorrow, not with what info and reads I have.
?
below bolded is also a really out of place stance with what reads you've shown in thread right now
already addressed the top part but i disagree with the bottom part. i find ari/bunny suspicious, i found cows suspicious (going on tone alone he's sounding more towny in these last few pages but i need to reread him carefully before I change my stance there), I find hockey to be weird af.
It's like, at least half of you are raising flags for me. That honestly puts the lurkers (dunn and nm) higher than you all. Then slightly above that is Wisdom.
idk man I thought the status of my reads were more obivous
myb i put too much into tone and not words but idwanna check right this moment
