I'm arguing UTILITY.In post 398, Three wrote:Sigh. You're just arguing semantics then. And not even particularly useful semantics.In post 392, House wrote:I'd say immunity to a PR's action and the potential to mislead town with a false Inno is pretty powerful.In post 391, Three wrote:I don't see how a false inno on a Goon effectively makes a Goon a PR if redtea can't shoot Goons but can shoot PRs.
I did.In post 399, redtea wrote:I think three made the point that my role is borderline negative-utility
This was exactly my reasoning a few posts ago.In post 393, redtea wrote:jeez rude, I'm still a member of town and that has value.In post 388, Three wrote:This is where I'm at.In post 386, House wrote:That's my guess.
It would effectively make your role borderline negative utility.
If people genuinely believe that we have a Vig that can only kill minimum zero/maximum one scum that otherwise only kills town PRs, why exactly is this slot still breathing if some people don't even believe the claim?
true. Does that point two 2 mafia prs then not counting the traitor, assuming the mod didn't have some odd idea then? And assuming I'm town ofc.In post 386, House wrote:That's my guess.
It would effectively make your role borderline negative utility.
Queer townbloc sounds good to me.redtea wrote:i'll post my queer flag collection asdkjfnladsknf would that clear me
This claim seems too complicated to come from scum?In post 348, redtea wrote:Okay caught up didn't realize people did say I should claim
I'm a town complex vigilante. Explains the bulletproof mafia, but that's also why my claim might not be that helpful as the counterpart has already been revealed.
HmmmmIn post 352, Dwlee99 wrote:T3 do you still think I should hammer this? Does not sound smart
In post 358, cool cookie wrote:i'm ambivalent about the claim. an outted traitor doesn't serve much purpose for mafia, so there isn't anything we particularly lose by giving redtea a night to prove the claim. gut is i don't buy it though
Fua's vote on george gut pinged me as really terrible.
This is more reviewer meta though.In post 371, Jacket wrote:I think making assumptions about setup composition based on what you think is balanced is a very bad idea.In post 368, Three wrote:The scum team never has Goons in a 2 Mafia + Traitor scenario, so a failed kill should be considered a clear.
Please take a second to breathe. This is the first time you mentioned utility, you specifically said PR before this. I don't really care about winning a semantics argument, especially since we're apparently on the same page anyway. So maybe drop this pointless back and forth.In post 400, House wrote:I'm arguing UTILITY.In post 398, Three wrote:Sigh. You're just arguing semantics then. And not even particularly useful semantics.In post 392, House wrote:I'd say immunity to a PR's action and the potential to mislead town with a false Inno is pretty powerful.In post 391, Three wrote:I don't see how a false inno on a Goon effectively makes a Goon a PR if redtea can't shoot Goons but can shoot PRs.
Staying to think you're not really misunderstanding me.
This shit is getting pretty blatant.
Why are you so tilted?In post 401, House wrote:I did.In post 399, redtea wrote:I think three made the point that my role is borderline negative-utility
Three echoed.
aw yeahIn post 403, Three wrote:Queer townbloc sounds good to me.redtea wrote:i'll post my queer flag collection asdkjfnladsknf would that clear me
Utility is... what makes a PR... a PR...In post 409, Three wrote:Please take a second to breathe. This is the first time you mentioned utility, you specifically said PR before this. I don't really care about winning a semantics argument, especially since we're apparently on the same page anyway. So maybe drop this pointless back and forth.In post 400, House wrote:I'm arguing UTILITY.In post 398, Three wrote:Sigh. You're just arguing semantics then. And not even particularly useful semantics.In post 392, House wrote:I'd say immunity to a PR's action and the potential to mislead town with a false Inno is pretty powerful.In post 391, Three wrote:I don't see how a false inno on a Goon effectively makes a Goon a PR if redtea can't shoot Goons but can shoot PRs.
Staying to think you're not really misunderstanding me.
This shit is getting pretty blatant.
It's TvT and I'm annoyed.In post 412, redtea wrote:this is ridiculous
if this isn't tvt i'll eat this delicious brownie
does scum go this hard over mechanics
People tend to write off shitfights like this as tvtIn post 412, redtea wrote:this is ridiculous
if this isn't tvt i'll eat this delicious brownie
does scum go this hard over mechanics
I see.In post 406, T3 wrote:In post 358, cool cookie wrote:i'm ambivalent about the claim. an outted traitor doesn't serve much purpose for mafia, so there isn't anything we particularly lose by giving redtea a night to prove the claim. gut is i don't buy it thoughFua's vote on george gut pinged me as really terrible.
I guess I should've said that it wasnt just the back and forth, but the vibes of it plus the fact it's all over the placeIn post 417, T3 wrote:People tend to write off shitfights like this as tvtIn post 412, redtea wrote:this is ridiculous
if this isn't tvt i'll eat this delicious brownie
does scum go this hard over mechanics
in practice they are actually slightly >rand t/s
On reread, this does come off as really forced.In post 35, fua wrote:VOTE: GeorgeBailey
Sure, I'll buy this and put some pressure here. I think trying to be quirky is weird too.
