1 Something_Smart (imaginality)
1 imaginality (Something_Smart)
1 Bingle (Morning Tweet)
Not voting: Bingle, House
With 5 alive, it takes 3 to yeet
D4 ends at (expired on 2021-10-16 13:26:20)
Or imaginality isn't 8-ball.In post 1823, Something_Smart wrote:But if MT votes imaginality and nobody hammers, then either he's scum or she is...
Huh? If imaginality is town, then scum win if he gets hammered. 8-ball doesn't matter.In post 1826, House wrote:Or imaginality isn't 8-ball.
This is literally scum giving you permission to throw the game, Tweetie.In post 1828, Something_Smart wrote:I do not think anyone would be mad at you for being wrong when House is being like this.
All hammertests do that though lolIn post 1818, Something_Smart wrote:Basically, what he's saying is that I was ignoring the possibility of Bingle popping up out of nowhere to hammer in the middle of you hammertesting him, or vice versa.
Which is a thing that's possible. And is probably a reason why not to hammertest! But in general, people ignore these things when hammertesting, and I don't think I've ever seen a hammertest go south because this happened.
Meanwhile, to hammertest any other way would depend on Bingle's cooperation, which he has no reason to give if he's scum.
Tell MT "I told you so" in post game chat after Bingle hammered, of course.In post 1832, Something_Smart wrote:Like if I vote imaginality, and MT votes imaginality, and Bingle doesn't hammer, then the team can't be me/Bingle. If I'm scum it would have to be with MT. So if she does that, then your theory would be proven wrong, so what would you do?
I'm about to do this and leave ftrIn post 1832, Something_Smart wrote:Like if I vote imaginality, and MT votes imaginality, and Bingle doesn't hammer, then the team can't be me/Bingle. If I'm scum it would have to be with MT. So if she does that, then your theory would be proven wrong, so what would you do?
About you being wrong?In post 1836, House wrote:Tell MT "I told you so" in post game chat after Bingle hammered, of course.In post 1832, Something_Smart wrote:Like if I vote imaginality, and MT votes imaginality, and Bingle doesn't hammer, then the team can't be me/Bingle. If I'm scum it would have to be with MT. So if she does that, then your theory would be proven wrong, so what would you do?
MT is the deciding vote. Whoever she votes is decided as the execution, even if it's not a hammer, because she is universally townread.In post 1839, House wrote:S_S is literally forwarding hypotheticals WHERE BINGLE IS THE DECIDING VOTE, here.
Yes genius, I am comfortable with someone I know is scum getting voted!In post 1845, House wrote:Yet S_S is comfortable setting up a scenario where OUTED SCUM IS THE DECIDING VOTE IN A GAME ENDING ELIMINATION.