Mafia 82: International (Game Over)

[Knight of Cydonia]

I'll vote netlava if needed, but it's a huge mistake to let cass lurk her way out of a wagon.

We don't have to get rid of cass today, though. I do think Cass is a bit scummy, but Netlava is much more so, IMO.

QFT.

[Lowell]

I'll vote netlava if needed, but it's a huge mistake to let cass lurk her way out of a wagon.

We don't have to get rid of cass today, though. I do think Cass is a bit scummy, but Netlava is much more so, IMO.

Never liked this logic. Things change overnight. People completely forget about the previous day. Also, I'd rather not set up two lynches at once.

[armlx]

People completely forget about the previous day. Also, I'd rather not set up two lynches at once.

This sounds like a contradiction to me, and nowhere did hascows say that he was assuredly lynching Cass next.

[Lowell]

He's implying that I should be happy with doing that instead of going after cass today.

[Knight of Cydonia]

Not really. He's saying Netlava is more scummy (true, IMHO) than cass, but cass shouldn't be ignored, and can be lynched tomorrow if nothing scummier presents itself.

[Korts]

No, Lowell has a point, actually, that looks kinda like a false dichotomy.

[Knight of Cydonia]

At no point did Has-Cow actually say "Netlava today, Cass tomorrow, that is all" though, which seems to be what Lowell is accusing him of doing.

[armlx]

No, Lowell has a point, actually, that looks kinda like a false dichotomy.

How is that a false dichotomy? In no place does Cow say "If not A, then B" about this scenario. Only "A > B, but B > 0 in scummitude".

[Korts]

That's true. But it does look like he's implying that the choice is between Net and Cass.

[armlx]

How?

[hasdgfas]

I'll vote netlava if needed, but it's a huge mistake to let cass lurk her way out of a wagon.

We don't have to get rid of cass today, though. I do think Cass is a bit scummy, but Netlava is much more so, IMO.

Never liked this logic. Things change overnight. People completely forget about the previous day. Also, I'd rather not set up two lynches at once.

and I'm not saying I'm setting up lynches. I want to lynch Netlava today. Then, we can look at Cass tomorrow and see if we still think she(?) is scummiest.

[Korts]

Ok, nevermind that. I thought for some reason that it was, but looking at it again, it doesn't look like one.

Gotta get some sleep now.

[Korts]

EBWOP: post 1536 at post 1534/1532.

[Skruffs]

will be MIA for a few days.

[StrangerCoug]

Seriously, why do you trust Skruffs so much as to follow his judgement?

That only applies in context with the analogy, which is what your cases on both of us ultimately boil down to, and for the last goddamn time, I saw the analogy as common sense. Give me something new to talk about.

And for the last time, common sense does not apply to mafia here.

Fine.

Unvote: raider8169
Vote: Rich

for being one of the least logical people to vote for at this stage of the game.

*gets booed and yelled at*

...Maybe not.

Unvote: Rich
Vote: raider8169

But since common sense, according to you, does not apply, how would you respond if I really did vote Rich (or any other player without a case on them, for that matter) at this stage of the game?

I also don't like how you jumped on me the second I questioned the analogy.

Oh, so you'd rather assume stuff arbitrarily and get yourself in trouble when your assumptions turn out to be wrong? Is that how I'm supposed to interpret this?

What do you mean by assuming stuff arbitrarily?

Come up with a certain belief, pursue it like mad, and don't think about the consequences of doing the latter. The less reasoning behind the belief, the better.

[raider8169]

Sorry about my lack of posting today. I am in the middle of doing my final project and not sure how much time I will have extra until next Monday. I will try to post but if anyone asked me anything please repost it on Monday. Sorry everyone.

[armlx]

I think that this common sense argument is dumb.

[Tom Mason]

It seems like Netlava is going for targets of opportunity, rather than any solid case of real merit. Happy with my vote.

I see the logic to that, I do. But to play Devil's Advocate... Cass was doing the same thing with her FOS parade on Day 1 from what I saw.

There is validity for a lynch of each of them, but I hate second-guessing my gut. More times than not, I end up wrong in those cases.

[Cyberbob]

But to play Devil's Advocate... Cass was doing the same thing with her FOS parade on Day 1 from what I saw.

Very very obviously very very different situations.

[Netlava]

Please tell where exactly have I been going after "targets of opportunity" and why they are considered opportunistic.

[StrangerCoug]

I think that this common sense argument is dumb.

Thank you ><

[Knight of Cydonia]

Netlava - two bloody good examples right there in that post - it's not like I'm not giving evidence. You flip-flop onto whichever wagon is convenient, and so far today, you've been pushing the raider case, then backing off it, then pushing it again, but you've never committed to it with a vote: your vote has stayed solidly on the wagon with the most chance of overtaking yours: Cass.
Still loving my vote.

[Cream147]

Please tell where exactly have I been going after "targets of opportunity" and why they are considered opportunistic.

To be honest, I think you need to take a step back, and reconsider your game. Making posts like this is certainly not helping your chances of making it to the end of today live.

In fact, Knight of Cydonia seems to have added a new layer to the Netlava case, what with the opportunistic voting. I'm going to keep my faith in Netlava for now, but I'm certainly not as confident with Netlava as with Dynamo anymore...

[Cyberbob]

To be honest, I think you need to take a step back, and reconsider your game. Making posts like this is certainly not helping your chances of making it to the end of today live.

Schooling much?

[Korts]

Okay, I don't really understand your actions, Cream. You make a fair point in regards to Netlava, and you comment on how KoC's point seems valid, yet your assessment of the situation is that you're keeping your faith in him?