Mafia 82: International (Game Over)

[skitzer]

Vote Count Seventeen of Day Two

(8) Netlava: hasdgfas, Cyberbob, armlx, Sineish, BlakAdder, raider8169, Knight of Cydonia
(4) Cass: Netlava, Lowell, Cephrir, Tom Mason
(3) raider8169: Battle Mage, StrangerCoug, EGL
(1) armlx: Skruffs
(1) BlakAdder: Cass
(1) StrangerCoug: Korts

(8) Not Voting: slanton2, Rich, Cream147, Citizen Karne, killa seven, Surye, The Only Ryan

With 24 alive, it takes 13 votes to lynch!

Last Post Count Seventeen of Day Two

Key:
Green - posted in last 24 hours
Blue - posted in last 48 hours
Olive - Posted in last 72 hours
Red - Posted more than 72 hours ago, prodded
Dark Red - Requiring Replacement
Dark Blue - Vacation/Limited Access

Skruffs

StrangerCoug

raider8169

armlx

Tom Mason

Cyberbob

Netlava

Knight of Cydonia

Cream147

Korts

killa seven

Lowell

Sineish

hasdgfas

EGL

Citizen Karne

Battle Mage

BlakAdder

Cephrir

Surye

The Only Ryan

Rich

Cass

slanton2

slanton2, Rich, and Cass may be replaced because of inactivity.
Prodding BlakAdder, Cephrir, and Surye.

[BlakAdder]

Still here. Not much has changed, I like my vote on Netlava.

[Netlava]

Apparently, I'm not allowed to ask people where this so-called "going after targets of opportunity" takes place. Amazing logic there.

[Korts]

Apparently, I'm not allowed to ask people where this so-called "going after targets of opportunity" takes place. Amazing logic there.

Well, not when it's quoted in the same post you ask in reply to.

[Netlava]

Oops, missed that ><

Netlava - two bloody good examples right there in that post - it's not like I'm not giving evidence. You flip-flop onto whichever wagon is convenient, and so far today, you've been pushing the raider case, then backing off it, then pushing it again, but you've never committed to it with a vote: your vote has stayed solidly on the wagon with the most chance of overtaking yours: Cass.
Still loving my vote.

Unvote: Cass

There.

[Netlava]

Original Roll String: 1d26

1 26-Sided Dice: (5) = 5

[Netlava]

18. Citizen Karne (replacing Tovarish)

Vote: Citizen Karne

[hasdgfas]

I really like my vote.

[Cream147]

Oh for God's sake. No need to have a tantrum about it.

[Netlava]

Hmm... so let's see... I've thought Cass was scum for a while now, but I have to change my opinion because her wagon has the most chance of overtaking mine. Sounds good to me.

Guess I need to stop "pushing" this raider case too.

[Cyberbob]

o_O

[Netlava]

>_>

[Cream147]

Hmm... so let's see... I've thought Cass was scum for a while now, but I have to change my opinion because her wagon has the most chance of overtaking mine. Sounds good to me.

Guess I need to stop "pushing" this raider case too.

This isn't going to get you anywhere. Calm down. I'll accept what you have to say on Cass, but you were a touch flippity-floppity in regards to Raider.

[Netlava]

Oh for God's sake. No need to have a tantrum about it.

Ok, maybe I need to tone down the sarcasm, but it's stupid when asking a question == throwing a tantrum.

[Netlava]

That's because I can't tell with raider. Anyways, hopefully he can answer my question when he gets back.

[Cream147]

18. Citizen Karne (replacing Tovarish)

Vote: Citizen Karne

This is the tantrum I was speaking off.

Random voting on the 63rd page == throwing a tantrum

[Netlava]

How accusing me of throwing a tantrum helpful in any way? I may be a bit annoyed at times when posting, but I still make my point without being too offensive.

The point is that asking people to justify their posts is not something I need to reconsider.

[Cream147]

How accusing me of throwing a tantrum helpful in any way? I may be a bit annoyed at times when posting, but I still make my point without being too offensive.

The point is that asking people to justify their posts is not something I need to reconsider.

How is random voting on page 63 helpful in anyway?

[Cephrir]

Prodded, still voting Cass, still preferring raider to Netlava.

[Tom Mason]

If for any other reason, I feel more confident in the vote against Cass because of her dialogue through both day phases.

It was okay for her to openly bandwagon vote... but she had no problem FOS'ing people for doing the same.

It was okay for her to FOS someone, but if someone else did it she would ask questions and add them to her "scum list".

I just find a lot of contradiction in the approach to her play so far and her reasoning for pointing at other people.

With Netlava, I do not think he would be sitting here with the shovel digging if he was not trying to make a point. And by point, I mean his innocence if he is lynched. I will not say he is making the most helpful case for himself, but I think he is cornered at this point and there is not much he can do.

[Citizen Karne]

Still waiting to hammer Netlava

[Korts]

Netlava - two bloody good examples right there in that post - it's not like I'm not giving evidence. You flip-flop onto whichever wagon is convenient, and so far today, you've been pushing the raider case, then backing off it, then pushing it again, but you've never committed to it with a vote: your vote has stayed solidly on the wagon with the most chance of overtaking yours: Cass.
Still loving my vote.

Unvote: Cass

There.

Oookay. This is... scummy. And then you go and vote according to a dice roll. That's seriously anti-town. You really aren't helping the town (or yourself) by flipping out.

I'm very inclined to vote you right about now.

[Cyberbob]

I'm very inclined to vote you right about now.

What's stopping you?

[armlx]

See above.

[Korts]

Because a) Netlava's overreaction is not a definite scumtell, and b) the rest of the case still isn't really convincing to me.