Laptop problems for the weekend. Shit keeps crashing when I load chrome so now i'm paranoid i'm part of a botnet.In post 374, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Thanks for the huge wall.
Next question, why you couldn’t say any of this previously? You’ve been on and off, but instead of an natural hands on approach we get this chunky boii.
If I claim will you have my backIn post 372, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:is there a claim coming anytime soon dude?
how marvelous it is, this game of being myselfIn post 302, Isis wrote:I think all of shiki's games are imitations in the same sense as how like carbon compounds have lots of refactored complicated patterns in them.
In post 350, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I thought we all decided Lady Chloe and George Bailey were the two scum and we're just waiting to send them up on a rocket ship
In post 358, Isis wrote:I think it's really likely George Bailey or Chloe is scum but they're not both scum
I think it makes very poor sense for George Bailey's read to not be confident because the underlying basis is like rotating the rubix cube at an angle where he looks at it and believed a woman is straight lying and lying is exceedingly scum indicative.
Scum George never does this to a partner, but I separately just like, hated 325 a lot. It was kind of narratey.
My negative feelings about Chloe are a lot less sharp when I talk it aloud.
VOTE: George Bailey
I am immensely uncomfortable with this gamestate.In post 360, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I want to see that reads list before a hammer.
In post 325, Lady Chloe wrote:My eyes glazed over reading you and Shiki's squabble.
In post 179, Datisi wrote:once upon a time, mena told me that if your eyes are heavily glazing over while reading someone's posts, that person is scum - and that is the feeling i am getting with lady chloe. at the very least, chloe/pooky give me the gut feeling of s/t but it do be early
It was only really Pooky or Isis scumreading you at the time. LHF would have been Holden honestly. That interaction was like, the only thing that stuck out at the time.In post 332, Lady Chloe wrote:It is not a new concept to believe The Lady has her hands full of blood, or at least question where her hands have been...
So it felt convenient for you to vote me with no foreseeable resistance.
And yet I still commit to my stance without caring.In post 379, shiki wrote:In post 325, Lady Chloe wrote:My eyes glazed over reading you and Shiki's squabble.In post 179, Datisi wrote:once upon a time, mena told me that if your eyes are heavily glazing over while reading someone's posts, that person is scum - and that is the feeling i am getting with lady chloe. at the very least, chloe/pooky give me the gut feeling of s/t but it do be early
why do you think GB voting you is opportunistic but you won't vote for him?In post 325, Lady Chloe wrote:George's vote is opportunistic.
? is your stance regarding me/datisi the same as datisi's regarding you? or ?In post 382, Lady Chloe wrote:And yet I still commit to my stance without caring.
Because I wanted him to justify himself but he reached L1 by that point and this happened at such a rate it feels like the same mob mentality towards my slot.In post 383, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:why do you think GB voting you is opportunistic but you won't vote for him?In post 325, Lady Chloe wrote:George's vote is opportunistic.
I don't know what you mean. Do you actually scumread me or are you parroting quotes that echo reason to suspect me?In post 385, shiki wrote:? is your stance regarding me/datisi the same as datisi's regarding you? or ?In post 382, Lady Chloe wrote:And yet I still commit to my stance without caring.
? i thought it was noteworthy you used the same phrasing to refer to datisi's interaction with me that datisi used when scumreading youIn post 389, Lady Chloe wrote:I don't know what you mean. Do you actually scumread me or are you parroting quotes that echo reason to suspect me?In post 385, shiki wrote:? is your stance regarding me/datisi the same as datisi's regarding you? or ?In post 382, Lady Chloe wrote:And yet I still commit to my stance without caring.
Your approach to me is disingenuous.
I entered this game being voted for lack of contentIn post 388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I like that rebel mentality.
VOTE: PookyTheMagicalBearYdrasse wrote:lady why haven't you voted this game
you're spiteful and i understand that but there's not a lot of... real fire behind the spite itself, it doesn't feel like you're offering alternatives which is like
hypocritical of me to say this when i throw tantrums on the regular but there's no direction you're putting it into which i would expect to see at least a vote accompanying something that you really stand for?
like give... something, people you'd want to kill and show us that you want to kill them? or at least me, idc about showing anyone else but for me right now i just see... hot air.
That, his earnest townread of you, quick hop onto George, and presuming to know what the thread wants.In post 396, Ydrasse wrote:because of his questionable taste when he talked to you earlier?