No clue.In post 373, RH9 wrote:Do you think that they are deliberately doing it or do you think that they just missed them?In post 372, numberQ wrote:I don't think anyone's explained the case against M&M yet tbh. At least not addressing my questions about it from earlier.
If someone who wants me to vote M&M could look at 294 and elaborate on your read a little, you'd really only be helping yourself. Because right now I feel like I only have townreads, and I'm pretty sure it's because this setup has a jester so it's making me question any other kind of read.