[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13175806 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1038: Brass and Shrapnel - Game Over - Mafiascum.net
I've modded it before. Though I'm not an expert on the best way to play this. When I next have more than 10 mins to check in I'll try to mine some helpful hints. It is a semi-open though so not sure how much relevance a past game will have unless this game rng'd the same setup.
Post
Post #154 (isolation #11) » Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:31 am
Postby CheekyTeeky »
I'm still fine with a LGW flip - but would like to poke around. I don't like that LGW stalled out at E-1 there are two reasons for that resistance. LGW is scum and buddy is off wagon or LGW is town and both scum already on wagon. So good flip either way imo.
Post
Post #160 (isolation #12) » Wed Dec 29, 2021 10:04 am
Postby CheekyTeeky »
In post 158, Flea The Magician wrote:Really? It's basically an Extended RVS wagon as far as I'm concerned. Game is low activity there's not much really to go on and it's clear pressure is just being ignored completely probably due to Yuletide spirits. D1 is bad in general but this seems awful.
I wouldn't consider it RVS at all. My initial rvs vote had reason behind it as LGW voted outside those who had already posted in the game which could be scum afraid of confrontation from the get go. I then called him town and unvoted to observe and they did the weird mafia doc tmimaybeslip thing and their posting isn't very convincing as town. From the "slip" I believe imaginality/LGW are tvs.
Kinda moot since she seems to be back now, but at the time, I didn't think there was enough content there to sort her. Since she's given some content, though, I would no longer say the same.
This is a weird thought process. The perspective that flea forced a solve including an absent player is sound but then to say its moot because I'm back doesn't make any sense because the solve was proposed while I was away not after I started posting. So it still stands that flea generated a forced solve including slots that could be considered LHF. What's your take on flea intent behind that?
In post 175, CheekyTeeky wrote:
It's more that in skimming their iso I don't think they're scum.
Fair enough.
Can you elaborate on this please:
In post 160, CheekyTeeky wrote:I then called him town and unvoted to observe and they did the weird mafia doc tmimaybeslip thing and their posting isn't very convincing as town. From the "slip" I believe imaginality/LGW are tvs.
Are you saying that you think imaginality/LGW are opposite alignments? If so why?
Imaginality accused LGW of scum slipping so they are not SvS. I think there's one scum in these two players so that rules out TvT fmpov.
In post 183, CheekyTeeky wrote:I think there's one scum in these two players so that rules out TvT fmpov.
Right but why do you think this? I get thinking LGW could be scum independently but I'm not understanding what about their interaction means one is likely to be scum.
It has nothing to do with them interacting and everything to do with the "slip" either LGW did slip or imaginality is pushing it as a slip because they know that role does exist as they are scum. It's moonlogic but that's how I roll ^.^
I don't buy that this is a consistent position. Post 53 you dismissed the slip but now it's meaningful enough that you think one of them is scum?
UNVOTE: Little Green Wheels VOTE: CheekyTeeky
Ftr I no longer think one of them is scum seeing as I also misunderstood the set up.
Also, your argument that I'm scum because I'm inconsistent is incredibly weak because it assumes that town are more consistent than scum when I've experienced the inverse to be true. Also also, there is no inconsistency because I didn't dismiss anything. I want to say you're town for trying to place me but I feel like an innocent witness being lead by the defense into falsely incriminating myself, I'm not sure of your motive.
In post 219, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Also, your argument that I'm scum because I'm inconsistent is incredibly weak because it assumes that town are more consistent than scum when I've experienced the inverse to be true. Also also, there is no inconsistency because I didn't dismiss anything. I want to say you're town for trying to place me but I feel like an innocent witness being lead by the defense into falsely incriminating myself, I'm not sure of your motive.
I'm not sure how your original reply to me could be intended to mean anything other than "No I don't think imaginality has a good point and that's not why I'm voting LGW".
Town can appear inconsistent because they're not bothered by how coherent they look but there will still be a reason for changing their mind. The reason I'm suspicious of you is that you changed your mind to push LGW v imaginality as being TvS, even though the logic for why you thought that doesn't really make sense.
What is your read on zefiend? You voted him because you wanted to poke around but haven't mentioned him since.
I don't do interrogation. I'd be happy to hear your own reads on others.
Post
Post #260 (isolation #25) » Mon Jan 03, 2022 1:33 am
Postby CheekyTeeky »
If you take a minute to do the CBA, you'll find that mafia are going to doc the person shooting regardless. They can't RB and doc. Second if some dies that someone claims they are targeting and they are the only death it tells you a lot. Sure scum will lie but if you do this each night you will catch someone out plus force scum not to shoot their outed target. This only increases in value as people flip in terms of poe.
Post
Post #269 (isolation #28) » Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:49 am
Postby CheekyTeeky »
And suddenly there's a gladiate between imaginality and myself. I just clicked that noone hammering LGW might actually indicate they're town and scum are uneasy hammering that (assuming at least one scum off wagon)
In post 269, CheekyTeeky wrote:And suddenly there's a gladiate between imaginality and myself. I just clicked that noone hammering LGW might actually indicate they're town and scum are uneasy hammering that (assuming at least one scum off wagon)
I mean, here you were assuming at least one scum off a hammerable wagon.
I think both scum were on imaginality before there was a chance they would have to be hammer. There's an outside chance of onion but not feeling it. It's different to your wagon which was the first wagon with a few reads supporting it, the imaginality wagon was a clear scum counter to zefiend so I assume both scum were on before hammer position.
Post
Post #355 (isolation #46) » Tue Jan 11, 2022 6:13 pm
Postby CheekyTeeky »
Yeah I totally killed LGW who would've voted with me and left you here when you're the only one in the game familiar with my meta. Too bad your buddy hammered an SS lol.
Post
Post #356 (isolation #47) » Tue Jan 11, 2022 6:21 pm
Postby CheekyTeeky »
Like it's obvious why you didn't kill me, no scum would kill me after two town trying to take me down. You then killed LGW hoping zefiend would vote me after my tunnel on them the whole game. Predictable af.
Even if I get hammered I want zefiend to learn from this game that scum will always leave the most easy to eliminate so if all roads point to one player at elo they're probably town.
Post
Post #360 (isolation #49) » Wed Jan 12, 2022 7:37 am
Postby CheekyTeeky »
It's not relevant because onion is obviously scum and clearly no vig shots went through so all that's telling scum is that you're not a supersaint so it's safe to hammer you.