In post 74, Dwlee99 wrote:Andante is sorta townie.
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/pmwff9l.gif)
Yeah I'm curious where that read comes from.
I really liked this post, Umlaut is most likely town, like there are definitely joq posts I looked at like "I really don't tr joq" and him being fascinated by me here feels like maf trying to take advantage of the fact I've put 0 effort into this. it's like "Hey look!! yall may not tr me, but andante over there? looking like a real good vote!" like, just chill, it's still D1, I was busy IRL, here now... thus I'll be working on reads. Umlaut town is something I feel good about though, also have only skimmed so far.In post 58, Umlaut wrote:This post is bad too. It's obvious in the context of voting her for it that I mean it's scummy, writing three paragraphs about how it's potentially ambiguous is just a way to do busywork.In post 39, joqiza wrote:"Bad" is a loose term, anyway. What did you even mean when you called her post bad? Did you mean it was a post a wolf was more likely to make? Did you mean it was anti-town or illogical? Did you simply disagree with what it was saying? Those are all valid interpretations and even though I assume it's the first I can't actually be sure.In post 36, Umlaut wrote:Oh well if you say so.
Everyone, Esther has clarified that her post isn't bad, nothing to see here.
You could be calling her post bad and she could be denying it and you might even both agree with each other but you have different definitions.
I've used "bad" as casual shorthand myself so I'm not trying to act superior. I've just given it some thought and maybe instead of calling things "bad" (or, on that subject, using the impossibly vague and somewhat offensive "gross") we could make it a habit to explain what we mean in precise terms.
Esther's post was bad because "andante's kinda idk flashed up" is a BS reason not to like it. It would be fine at least as RVS posts go if it were just "andante wagon is already E-1" or even just "I like this wagon more" with no explanation. Actually the 34-35 vote jump reads +town for me though, it's a bit more extra credit work than I expect from scum who would probably just say in 35 something like "actually third on both but still" rather than change their vote based on it. Looks like Three and Roadkill saw the same thing as I did from 41 and 45, which makes me feel pretty good about them too.
Going against the grain on Dwlee here, I don't think they're hard definite town or anything like that but 38 seems like a difficult post for scum to make since it basically says "as town I'm likely to do [the opposite of what I'm doing here]"
That leaves {Wh4t, joqiza, Sleepless Assassin, Andante}. Of these I think I'll
VOTE: joqiza
because 39 rubbed me the wrong way and his other posts (23, 27, 40) similarly look like busywork. Also if I squint 19 sort of seems like a misrep because it demands citations of something (town lolhammeringin RVSspecifically) that Andante didn't actually claim ever occurred.
2/10 - doing 1 post per person I think, just gotta figure stuff outIn post 54, Wh4t wrote:Bad post. Bad vote.In post 39, joqiza wrote:"Bad" is a loose term, anyway. What did you even mean when you called her post bad? Did you mean it was a post a wolf was more likely to make? Did you mean it was anti-town or illogical? Did you simply disagree with what it was saying? Those are all valid interpretations and even though I assume it's the first I can't actually be sure.In post 36, Umlaut wrote:Oh well if you say so.
Everyone, Esther has clarified that her post isn't bad, nothing to see here.
You could be calling her post bad and she could be denying it and you might even both agree with each other but you have different definitions.
I've used "bad" as casual shorthand myself so I'm not trying to act superior. I've just given it some thought and maybe instead of calling things "bad" (or, on that subject, using the impossibly vague and somewhat offensive "gross") we could make it a habit to explain what we mean in precise terms.
SA, Three, mcE, roadkill town.
Phone posting so unlikely to do words proper until a bit later in the day assuming noone gets limmed prior to then.
I like these early wagons and have a bit to digest.
UNVOTE:
oh okay thenIn post 83, Andante wrote:wh4t gave "reads" there is NOTHING of that sort in joqiza's ISO, joqiza probably maf
Not anything in particular. I'd just like to see a bit more initiative in general, but this isn't particular to you in hindsight since I feel the same about wh4t and Dwlee. I assume it's wariness about hitting the daily post limit, which is fair, but no one's really gotten close to that yet.In post 73, mc esther wrote:i should really start pausing and thinking a little before ending these posts.
is there any, uh, "thing" (post? iso? event? idk lol) specifically that you'd like me to weigh in on? i'll give it a shot, but there's a good chance that i havent weighed in on it because i dont have thoughts.In post 70, Three wrote:I just want to see her engage with the game a bit more.
That's fair, and I do agree with that and commented similarly earlier.In post 74, Dwlee99 wrote:I feel like it's kind of an unspoken rule when signing up for this game that you won't just meme around / you'll try to be serious about it. That's kinda the point of this rule set.In post 70, Three wrote:I am thinking, though I don't really have a normal thought process I guess. Could you explain what you believe I said wrong/thoughtlessly here? I don't see it.In post 57, Dwlee99 wrote:Three I'm starting to think you're not thinking when you say things like thisIn post 56, Three wrote:I don't really see any memeing either. : /In post 53, Dwlee99 wrote:I am typically still memeing this early idk what games you're looking at
Do you have any takes, preferably hot?
My takes are umlaut town, mc esther scum. I don't have enough experience with her to know if the vote hopping is normal from her but I think it's slightly scum-indicative.
I agree with Umlaut town, Esther scum is more of a hot take though. She's null town for me, I just want to see her engage with the game a bit more. Is everyone else null for you?
Andante is sorta townie.
@Roadkill
I'm not going wild because serious + post restriction + page 3. I think that should be pretty obvious. I don't think the content so far is super enlightening on a cursory glance which is pretty much the response you predicted but yea
I kind of think he's town for now. But yeah that post kind of started the dialogue. He hasn't replied yet. I don't know how you fault me for it not going anywhere yet.Andante wrote:
63 is "Umlaut, how is explaining my reads on Dwelee and Roadkill fluffy? Also your reads are about opposite mine so... yeah. This game could be awkward."
like, you're acknowledging opposite reads? you don't want to try and explain why a sr of umlaut is town? or why an umlaut tr is maf? instead of just calling it awkward, you could work with umlaut?
I assume you mean Pony on Mafia Universe?Andante wrote: ~ This post is on Dwlee (see, super clear! post before this was Sleepless) ~
lol Dwlee trying to pocket me I see... also if you know pony? idk you XD (maybe I do... idk lol)
Is there a reason defending you is town rather than a white knight?Andante wrote: I like 21!! it's like, kinda sticking up for me when I wasn't here "yeah it's not AI" like, thank you!! lol me getting hammered there was a genuine concern, cause I feel like I'm definitely the kind of person to get lolhammered
What does this reference to Dwlee and the turbo game even mean? It just confuses me.In post 83, Andante wrote:
64 "I really need Andante to come back. My train of thought is unresolved there and I feel like everything will click once I get a read on her." Is this to just buy you time to actually put any effort into this? "Oh I don't have to try till she shows up and links games" like, I'm pretty sure Dwlee was there for turbo mode game, and you're all " they ain't partners"
Why even post this. So unnecessary and mean spirited. I hope your wifi goes down next time you wanna watch NetflixIn post 83, Andante wrote: 62 "Meh whatever. I'm thinking about it more and getting after people on language use is pointless. Y'all can talk how you want to talk." wow. pointless to go after how people talk? who'd have guessed?
EBWOP: will finish it this evening, ran out of timeIn post 97, joqiza wrote:Will expand on all of this in a couple hours when I'm on lunch break
33 is explaining a read? You're reading Dwlee as scum for... being more concerned about the post limit than you? That's novel.In post 63, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Umlaut, how is explaining my reads on Dwelee and Roadkill fluffy? Also your reads are about opposite mine so... yeah. This game could be awkward.
I don't think it's impossible for scum to make a post like 58, and you're right that they only sayIn post 68, Roadkill wrote:as for the reads themselves, umlaut: why do you think scum would have an issue presenting something they might do and then subvert it (58)? the post you linked, 38, isn't a very intense descriptor of play and even has it stated as some games, as in, sometimes dwlee will not go wild, so it's... it's not really difficult to go against something you only do sometimes.
also, is 19 really a misrep? you're stretching, but also... the context makes sense? we were around rvs, and andante mentioned lolhammering, to me that feels like... the connection made that andante fears being lolhammered in rvs/that point of the game.
(i have some other thoughts on your joqiza read but i think they're best chewed upon until you reply to him/if you do.)
He wasn't trying to reassure Andante or clarify anything, he was specifically suggesting that Andante was lying and didn't really believe she could be in danger. That is a misrep, intentional or not.In post 19, joqiza wrote:Going to ask you to cite examples of town lolhammering someone in RVS because it's pretty rare in my experience. I'm not sure I believe thatyoubelieve that you were just going to get run up and die.