I think I'm voting for a third party right now.
*sigh*
unvote
I don't really feel like voting for myself, and ZONEACE does seem a little suspicious. Not as suspicious as me, I guess, and not as suspicious to me as PeaceBringer, but enough to get my vote for now.
vote: ZONEACE
******************************************
**** WARNING: BIG FREAKING POST FOLLOWS ****
******************************************
PeaceBringer wrote:
You jumped on someone for minor stuff and folks reacted quickly. I voted to get reaction and see what is going on. I then unvoted (something I do a lot of regardless of role) and looking at what happens. What pray tell have we to discuss or interact about on a day one. We need stuff to happen. I have learned a lot recently about my being more effective if I watch reactions generated by others rather then trying to cause reactions myself. I still do it some, but get better reads by sitting back.
This is my first game, and I think I am probably guilty of this as well, you still seem a little bit suspicious to me.
PeaceBringer wrote:
didn't unvote because HM you claimed to be "safe" goal on day one is to get through without lynching a role player and hope to lynch scum. I suspect HM you picked someone in the so-called "hot spot" in order to try and bandwagon quick. I always suspected "town" claims who put up a strong fight to survive, especially on day one.
fair enough, I am indeed a safe lynch. It is kind of interesting that you are claiming that I am putting up a strong fight to survive, and LazarusMoth is claiming that I give up too easily. Oh well. If I do get lynched day 1, I hope that I will have provided the mafia with enough information about everybody elses reactions to help lynch the townies.
olliep wrote:
HairyMezican:
I disagree with the way you've listed suspects in your last post.
Firstly, I don't think I "haven't posted much". I'm sure there are other people who havent posted as much as me. Yeah, and this is my first mafia game.
Secondly, there should be nine people on your "no lynch list". Only 12 people currently have votes on people.
Then you put me on the list for voting you, even though i unvoted you. I think that you should redo your lists and then you will realise that I don't deserve to be a suspect.
Still not voting. I still think that we dont have enough cause or evidence to lynch someone and we should wait til tomorrow.
1) I think when I posted that message, you hadn't been talking much. Since then, you have been posting much more.
2) No, there were only 3 people that were supporting a "no lynch" option. This is very different from an undecided as to who to vote for option.
3) I don't find the fact that people are voting for me suspicious. I find the fact that I got so many votes so quickly a little bit concerning. Obviously some of the people voting for me were concerned Mafia, but I think that there are probably some townies in there as well seeking to end the day with the least amount of conversation possible. That particular list contained the people that I felt jumped on me a little too quickly. If people vote for me now that I have had a good chance to defend my actions, I would not find that scummy at all.
4) What do you think will happen between now and tomorrow that will give better cause to lynch someone? 2 people will be killed, and they will surely be the least suspicious 2. I would encourage you to vote for someone. The lynching is more than just a way to eliminate someone. It is a way to confirm someone's role, with the cost that that person is also eliminated. When 2 people are already getting killed every night, it really doesn't do that much more damage to the town to eliminate a single extra person at random, and it does do the town quite a bit of good to get rid of some of the more suspicious people to find out if they were scum or not. You two main options at this point are either me or ZONEACE, and I would encourage you to vote for one of us.
5) Yes, I know that this is your first game. It is my first game too. Which is why I'm not claiming that some of your behaviour that I find scummy is a clear indication that you are scum.
Maximus wrote:
My vote will stay on HairyMezican because he has made poor defensive statements, he used the "these ppl are bad cuz they voted for me" technique rather than defending himself.
I don't think that's quite what I've done. I think I will just leave it at that.
joe wrote:
it was also suspicious how he tried to turn a lot of attention off of himself towards people who really didn't seem guilty.
My goal was to get the mafia talking. When people talk, the people with less to hide win. I think I did a pretty good job of illuminating suspicious people, and surely I could probably go into a separate list all by myself.
Sorry for the long post. Lynch on.
DISCLAIMER: May not account for the actions of serial killers, multiple town groups, town groups that choose not to kill, vigilantes, one-shot vigilantes, multiple-but-finite shot vigilantes, doctors, town doctors, roleblockers, bulletproof mafia, bulletproof townies, survivalists, weak old ladies, cults, arsonists, cannibals, cowards, lynching masons, or transcendental cryptanalysts. Offer void in the state of Indiana.
