Mini Theme 2264: Fusion Upick | Post Game

[Toogeloo]

Vote me.

I don't mind...

Good, more votes on Enchant, please.

[Enchant]

Vote me.

I don't mind...

Good, more votes on Enchant, please.

I am not answering anti-town questions.

You voting me for this doesh't look any good.

[MegAzumarill]

Galron has been prodded

[Radical Rat]

Also, i remind, my role works only when i am voted. Duh. So can you?

Seems to me like this question was already answered. If this information is anti-Town, why share it earlier?

[Galron]

VOTE: Ircher

Still scummy.

[Enchant]

Also, i remind, my role works only when i am voted. Duh. So can you?

Seems to me like this question was already answered. If this information is anti-Town, why share it earlier?

It's not direct answer, and implue both variants.

I don't want to share, because it's basically "Are you worth to kill?" question.

[Radical Rat]

I mean yeah, I agree with you not specifying, if just seemed odd that you didn't have a problem with it earlier

[Enchant]

I had problem with it earlier.

[Ircher]

VOTE: Enchant
Sure.

[Enchant]

Thanks.

[MegAzumarill]

Vc below

[MegAzumarill]

Votecount 2.0.3



Ircher (3) Galron, Radical Rat, Cat Scratch Fever [E-3]
Radical Rat (2) Nordom, Enchant
Greeting (2) Nathann, Flea The Magician
Enchant (3) Almost50, Toogeloo, Ircher
Flea the Magician (1) Greeting

Not Voting: (0)

With 11 alive it takes 6 to eliminate.
Deadline: (expired on 2022-03-07 17:20:41)

[Nathann]

What makes you think that general observations of mafia somehow don't apply to this game?

That's not how that works. If you want to claim a vague general principle applies to this game, you need to actually give proof why it does.

I could say that scum are likely to post less than town is. So would I be able to pull up the Activity overview, list the bottom three names on it, and conclude that's the scumteam? No, I'd have to give some reasoning on why I think it's likely this game has extremely low scum activity.

And, like I said, that wagon was horrible, so the fact that you're using that "general principle" to avoid looking at it is, uh, sketchy.

In this case, the scums in my opinion clearly did not want to reveal information by killing Andante. Why do you think that me wanting to figure out the purpose of the nightkill makes me scum?

I think you mentioning the nightkill is somewhat +scum. And the fact that you mentioned it, and then did not do anything with that information, is +++scum.

[Nathann]

Yeah, I went with the wagon, but because I agreed with the arguments presented. Sadly, I wasn't around past Roden's claim which would have made me withdraw.

Why would you have withdrawn? What did the claim change about the arguments you say you agreed with?

Let me just say that I had a very good reason to believe the Vengeful + Gunsmith claim from

Roden

, but I saw it past hammer.

Even if you had reason to believe the claim was true, that doesn't make Roden town...?

[Nathann]

Ircher, how many votes do you have to be on for you to actually start elaborating on your thought process and on the asked questions?

[Greeting]

That's not how that works. If you want to claim a vague general principle applies to this game, you need to actually give proof why it does.

I could say that scum are likely to post less than town is. So would I be able to pull up the Activity overview, list the bottom three names on it, and conclude that's the scumteam? No, I'd have to give some reasoning on why I think it's likely this game has extremely low scum activity.

Actually, no, I don't. I am free to scumhunt however I like. And I'm at liberty to use a method that has worked for me in the past.

And, like I said, that wagon was horrible, so the fact that you're using that "general principle" to avoid looking at it is, uh, sketchy.

It wasn't horrible. It was regrettable, that's for sure, but

Almost50

had decent and logical reasoning for it. Unfortunately, it was

Roden

who was telling the truth and it's the fault of everyone who was on their wagon for not believing, including myself.

I think you mentioning the nightkill is somewhat +scum. And the fact that you mentioned it, and then did not do anything with that information, is +++scum.

I think you either haven't read or have forgotten what I said in 388. In case of either, I think that there is nothing more I can do with that information.

[Enchant]

Are Greeting alt?

[Nathann]

Sure, I cannot stop you. I can call you out for looking scummy as heck, though.

And there were no alignment-conclusions on anyone from your NKA, so I don't really consider that

doing

something with the information.

[Enchant]

I don't think Greeting is scum, it's more likely Toog who tried badly to to answer with "Uh idk but i think it's Andante powerrole but i am not sure", while anyone who can read already know what happened.

Because i kinda wanted to ask same question, but exactly not wanting to look scummy stopped me. Really, even i know it's suspicious to ask this.

Question is valid i mean, why Andante die? Not sure if it's worth pushing.

[Greeting]

Anyway, back to more relevant stuff:

As for the

Ircher

wagon, tbh his ISO doesn't look too great. I didn't like and totally don't agree with his game solve from 171. I took it with a pinch of salt at the time and kinda ignored it. I have an issue with that though, namely I'm unsure if that isn't simply how he normally plays mafia. I'll need to check his game history before considering jumping on this wagon.

I am sorry for your bad mood,

Flea

, and sorry for the abuse that was aimed at you. I try to respect your pronouns too, sometimes unfortunately I forget. That doesn't, however, mean that you can't have gotten a red PM in this game.

I'm sorry to hear that. Who do you think should be the major suspect right now?

I'm assuming that's me given your vote. What makes me your prime suspect now?

[Greeting]

Are Greeting alt?

No, I'm not and I don't have one. Why do people keep asking me this?

[Greeting]

Sure, I cannot stop you. I can call you out for looking scummy as heck, though.

And there were no alignment-conclusions on anyone from your NKA, so I don't really consider that

doing

something with the information.

Fair enough, I think the discussion reached its endpoint then.

[Greeting]

The claims of both

Nathann

and

Enchant

are very specific and both came early in the game. However, given that this is an experimental game, I think that makes both of these claims credible and I find no real reason not to believe either.

This will be my last post in a row. Sorry for that.

[Ircher]

Ircher, how many votes do you have to be on for you to actually start elaborating on your thought process and on the asked questions?

Twenty more.

[Flea The Magician]

Anyway, back to more relevant stuff:

As for the

Ircher

wagon, tbh his ISO doesn't look too great. I didn't like and totally don't agree with his game solve from 171. I took it with a pinch of salt at the time and kinda ignored it. I have an issue with that though, namely I'm unsure if that isn't simply how he normally plays mafia. I'll need to check his game history before considering jumping on this wagon.

I am sorry for your bad mood,

Flea

, and sorry for the abuse that was aimed at you. I try to respect your pronouns too, sometimes unfortunately I forget. That doesn't, however, mean that you can't have gotten a red PM in this game.

I'm sorry to hear that. Who do you think should be the major suspect right now?

I'm assuming that's me given your vote. What makes me your prime suspect now?

All of the above have already been answered.
Do not belittle me.

I am well aware that bullshit around me currently does not prevent a red pm, nor does you mishandling of my pronouns which I was more subtle about.

The attempt to use the last two games as solid definitions of meets ignoring that both had extenuating circumstances is misrepresentation and creating a false narrative, the post weird above is continuing this attempt to misrepresent with the implication my dismissal of your crap case is little more than correction of my pronouns.

You and Nordom currently. I'm mobile so unable to takes as much of an in depth look at Nordom.