which literally leads toIn post 547, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i'm thinking we go deeper into the game eliminating the most obvious suspectsIn post 539, chavela wrote:and if you are right about one of the two players you strongly suspect?
It's so easy to say that 'widely townread player' is 'town because of x'In post 545, chavela wrote:well could be deepwolfing > if so likely partnered with lurker (which is solid logic as it'd be assumed i would escape unless i felt partner would not get out if i left) > but overall unlikelyIn post 542, chavela wrote:i do not think i have seen marcistar lay out possible narratives in this way and then weigh themIn post 540, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Yes, i have met players like Marcistar that break my heart and turn out to be scum even though they enticed me with their sweet and pure posts.In post 538, chavela wrote:do you often see mafia doing that? if so could you show me examples pleaseIn post 535, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Um, i don't see why that is so very good.
but also i think i've only seen two marcistar mafia games
is just not something i see mafia doing a lot
i can't really say never but to me it's a pretty towny thought process that just feels a to b to c right
nope not really as previously discussedIn post 549, humaneatingmonkey wrote:do you townread bugs, chav?
but wouldn't it be fun if i'm rightIn post 550, chavela wrote:like it's just an absurd suggestion across the board
no i agree with you on the first partIn post 551, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's so easy to say that 'widely townread player' is 'town because of x'
v_v
I think we are going to inherently disagree with each other on this tho, so not point in us trying to convince each other.
definitely not making my worry about your possible partners less
Also how, Bugspray and Enchant has both already placed their trust vote.
as it's most likely one of those two
oh good call lolIn post 558, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also how, Bugspray and Enchant has both already placed their trust vote.
They added this stupid rule after DkKuba yoloed 3 ppl at once (and left with scum) and i threatened to randomtrust every 24 hours if game will stall.In post 558, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also how, Bugspray and Enchant has both already placed their trust vote.
It's stupid, now i dying from boredom.In post 565, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Probably not and stupid rule then.
In post 566, Enchant wrote:It's stupid, now i dying from boredom.In post 565, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Probably not and stupid rule then.
HEM said they should do this at start of day 2, when either one can place a new trust.In post 560, chavela wrote:oh good call lolIn post 558, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also how, Bugspray and Enchant has both already placed their trust vote.
But I think this is pretty thin and calling it "really good" is a stretchIn post 529, chavela wrote:i start to get slightly paranoid of meuh at times but then posts like this are like,In post 483, Meuh wrote:I guess Chav could always be deepwolfing to advance mafia’s goals but I doubt it. If that’d be the case I’d assume her partner is more of a lurker
really good right
because it seems to be trying to fill in all of the possible narratives
while also weighing the likelihood of those narratives at the same time
Like why though. To scum test Meuh? Or do you think this is a good pairing?
I don't think i've said i townread them.In post 569, Pavowski wrote:Could Norwee / Chav give some reasons for townreading Meuh?
Ok I thought I remembered you saying you liked some of her posts. Let me ask instead of inferringIn post 572, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't think i've said i townread them.In post 569, Pavowski wrote:Could Norwee / Chav give some reasons for townreading Meuh?