Mafia 85 - Murder at the Bus Stop (game over)

Wall-E · Post Post #1200 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:26 am

BlakAdder wrote:Okay, screw this. My scumdar just overloaded. I'm going to insist that we either lynch Wall-E or Al4xz today.
We get it. You thought we had purposefully lynched the doc. You still have not explained where you saw his doc claim beforehand (except for the obviously slapped-together excuse involving xtoxm's soft claim). Al4xz has not explained why he defended you, and you have not explained why you simply quoted him and let it go.

Uh... cabbage?

Mod edit
Votecount:
Wall-E (5): Alabaska J, Muerrto, Surye, BlakAdder, al4xz
Surye (2): springlullaby, Riceballtail
al4xz (2): kuribo, armlx
Alabaska J (1): Jebus
kuribo (1): Xtoxm
Jebus (1): farside22
Riceballtail (1): Wall-E

Not voting (6): Azuma, RestFermata, Gremwell, Slepz, Zazier, Cream147

With 19 alive it's 10 to lynch.

BlakAdder · Post Post #1201 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:36 am

Just quit while you're behind.

Wall-E · Post Post #1202 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:38 am

...ok.

Why are you defending me, person who is defending me? I'm curious now as well.

Jebus · Post Post #1203 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:58 am

That was al4x who's defending you, and I'm curious as to that response as well.

al4xz · Post Post #1204 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:49 pm

Okay, screw this. My scumdar just overloaded. I'm going to insist that we either lynch Wall-E or Al4xz today.
We get it. You thought we had purposefully lynched the doc. You still have not explained where you saw his doc claim beforehand (except for the obviously slapped-together excuse involving xtoxm's soft claim). Al4xz has not explained why he defended you, and you have not explained why you simply quoted him and let it go.

Ugh! How irritating. I already explained WHY I defended him, god damn it! Back then, there was a possibility that he was a Town that made a mistake, until I realized what you stated (that Wall-E thought that we had purposely lynched the doc) was correct and extremely scummy. I then proceeded to switch sides. However, you still insist upon saying that I DID NOT state my reasoning behind defending him! Read, please! Look at post one thousand one hundred and ninety-three, 1193!

THAT IS THE POST WHERE YOU HELPFULLY SUPPLIED WALL-E WITH HIS JUSTIFICATION.

HE QUOTED THAT POST AND AGREED.

YOU ARE TERRIBLE AT BUSSING.

Caps off, pl0x, or I'm going to be extremely annoyed. Yes, I provided him with his justification. He then proceeded to quote my post completely and agree, because he was completely clueless as well to why he did what he did.

So, for the fourth time, and after EACH AND EVERY POST UNTIL YOU ANSWER:

WHY DID YOU ANSWER WALL-E'S QUESTION FOR HIM?

I was under the impression I had answered one of theo ther players who are backing you, not Wall-E.

al4xz · Post Post #1205 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:53 pm

Jebus wrote:That was al4x who's defending you, and I'm curious as to that response as well.

...ok.

Why are you defending me, person who is defending me? I'm curious now as well.

I am no longer defending you because I believe you to be scum. Take no offence, this is a game.
I am now attacking you because I believe your reasoning is weak. It sounds like something you slapped together. However...

I had a reason. I am trying to explain it.

You guys are right about one thing: I essentially thought I'd lynched the doc, and while I felt bad, I figured you guys had a good reason for doing it, and so I didn't say "Well why the hell did you guys do that?!" when I posted. Instead I let it slide and figured I'd catch up at another time.

I will continue to answer questions about this.

...

Despite all the evidence gathered agaisnt you and the fact that the actiosn you have commited are extremely scummy, I can't ignore the fact that gut instinct tells me you aren't scum. I hate having to choose between fact or stomach...

Okay, screw this. My scumdar just overloaded. I'm going to insist that we either lynch Wall-E or Al4xz today.
We get it. You thought we had purposefully lynched the doc. You still have not explained where you saw his doc claim beforehand
(except for the obviously slapped-together excuse involving xtoxm's soft claim).
Al4xz has not explained why he defended you, and you have not explained why you simply quoted him and let it go

It was slapped together. What's your damn point, Oh Great One Who Does Not Read?

Wall-E · Post Post #1206 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:58 pm

So at the end of that post you said I feel town to you, but you're lynching me anyway, and now you're looking suspiciously at the guy attacking me.

I think your reaction gave me whiplash.

armlx · Post Post #1207 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:00 pm

I am no longer defending you because I believe you to be scum. Take no offence, this is a game.
I am now attacking you because I believe your reasoning is weak. It sounds like something you slapped together. However...

This makes me want to lynch al4xz over Wall-E. that, and my memories of Wall-E's actions in Sensfan's High School Mafia.

Wall-E · Post Post #1208 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:01 pm

What did I do in that game that reminds you of this one?

al4xz · Post Post #1209 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:03 pm

Wall-E wrote:So at the end of that post you said I feel town to you, but you're lynching me anyway, and now you're looking suspiciously at the guy attacking me.

I think your reaction gave me whiplash.

Null to the last part of the first paragraph. I cannot deny the fact that there is clear evidence against you. Nor can I deny gut instnct.

Armlx, was that intended for me to respond to, or was it merely something you said?

RestFermata · Post Post #1210 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:06 pm

Wall-E does stuff like this all the time. It doesn't really surprise me. I'm going to have to keep an eye on it just because you shouldn't let things go just based on playstyle. Al4xz looks much more suspicious at this point, not because he gave Wall-E an out, but because he is ambiguously for and against Wall-E.

al4xz · Post Post #1211 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:33 pm

RestFermata wrote:Wall-E does stuff like this all the time. It doesn't really surprise me. I'm going to have to keep an eye on it just because you shouldn't let things go just based on playstyle. Al4xz looks much more suspicious at this point, not because he gave Wall-E an out, but because he is ambiguously for and against Wall-E.

I guess I can accept that.

Hmph. According to you, he does it all the time, does he? Can you confirm that, or is that a general impression of some sort?

RestFermata · Post Post #1212 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:40 pm

No, not without referring to ongoing games.

kuribo · Post Post #1213 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:43 pm

Wall-E wrote:I had a reason. I am trying to explain it.

You guys are right about one thing: I essentially thought I'd lynched the doc, and while I felt bad, I figured you guys had a good reason for doing it, and so I didn't say "Well why the hell did you guys do that?!" when I posted. Instead I let it slide and figured I'd catch up at another time.

I will continue to answer questions about this.

I AM NOT ASKING YOU ANYTHING.

I AM ASKING AL4XZ A QUESTION.

THE TWO OF YOU NEED TO STOP THIS WHOLE "WE ARE VENOM" SYMBIOTIC BIT.

WE GET IT, YOU'RE SCUM BUDDIES.

kuribo · Post Post #1214 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:45 pm

al4xz wrote: I am no longer defending you because I believe you to be scum. Take no offence, this is a game.

"awwww, poor wall-e, it's okay buddy, it's just a bus, it'll help us win. there there. there there. i won't let them mean ol' townies get us. shhhh. it's okay."

kuribo · Post Post #1215 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:46 pm

armlx wrote:
I am no longer defending you because I believe you to be scum. Take no offence, this is a game.
I am now attacking you because I believe your reasoning is weak. It sounds like something you slapped together. However...
This makes me want to lynch al4xz over Wall-E. that, and my memories of Wall-E's actions in Sensfan's High School Mafia.

The kicker is... it's not the reasoning Wall-E slapped together, it's al4xz's reason... that al4xz is criticizing. WTF?

al4xz · Post Post #1216 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:58 pm

kuribo wrote:
armlx wrote:
I am no longer defending you because I believe you to be scum. Take no offence, this is a game.
I am now attacking you because I believe your reasoning is weak. It sounds like something you slapped together. However...
This makes me want to lynch al4xz over Wall-E. that, and my memories of Wall-E's actions in Sensfan's High School Mafia.
The kicker is... it's not the reasoning Wall-E slapped together, it's al4xz's reason... that al4xz is criticizing. WTF?

No, Oh So Great Kuribo, the reasoning I am criticizing is this.

I had a reason. I am trying to explain it.

You guys are right about one thing: I essentially thought I'd lynched the doc, and while I felt bad, I figured you guys had a good reason for doing it, and so I didn't say "Well why the hell did you guys do that?!" when I posted. Instead I let it slide and figured I'd catch up at another time.

I will continue to answer questions about this.

I AM ASKING AL4XZ A QUESTION.

What question?

WHY DID YOU ANSWER WALL-E'S QUESTION FOR HIM?

Who is "Him"?

kuribo · Post Post #1217 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:04 pm

....

Who do you THINK I mean by "him?"

Wall-E was asked why he said what he said.

You answered for him.

armlx · Post Post #1218 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:23 pm

Armlx, was that intended for me to respond to, or was it merely something you said?

Whichever one you feel like.

What did I do in that game that reminds you of this one?

This reminds me of how you got entangled with IcemanE in that game.

The kicker is... it's not the reasoning Wall-E slapped together, it's al4xz's reason... that al4xz is criticizing. WTF?

Definitely agree here.

Wall-E · Post Post #1219 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:39 pm

You guys, I'm town. Honest. I have no idea what anybody is saying right now, but it sounds like you're all secretly agreeing that SOMEDAMNBODY is scum, and I'd like to be let in on the secret.

armlx · Post Post #1220 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:59 pm

Its al4xz.

Wall-E · Post Post #1221 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:26 pm

What are the major points against al4xz, aside from defending me, semi-flip flopping and unvoting when pressured?

That is an honest question.

Surye · Post Post #1222 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:28 pm

Wall-E wrote:You guys, I'm town. Honest.

Haha.

Unvote

I'm not feeling a Wall-E vote anymore. I think pressure has showed it wasn't a scum slip from Wall-E. al4xz is interesting, I kinda see what he did as strawmanning, since he made up an excuse for Wall-E, then attacked that excuse as an attack against Wall-E. Sure, Wall-E agreed with the excuse, but that was long after.

springlullaby · Post Post #1223 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:38 pm

Armlx, you multiple references to meta are becoming obscure and arcane. And I'm not entirely sure you're not just pulling them out of your posterior. Link please.

Plus, I'm not liking the way you are presenting them, more as a justification of your own suspicions than as element of a case because you are never forthcoming with the explanation of how your meta is relevant. So yeah, explain the High School reference and why it is relevant please.

I'm not sure I buy a wall-e/alex dichotomy.

Wall-E · Post Post #1224 (ISO) » Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:04 pm

Can you please define the "dichotomy" you disbelieve, springlullaby?