Hi! So bulge became a bit more concerning to me after the "huh?" with posts like this:In post 99, Bellaphant wrote:Actually, DV, can you talk more about bulge?
I'm not massively tr-ing either slot but like...I hadn't noticed the little things that std pointed out .
Vex's post felt like a true attempt to get the game moving, likely out of frustration from the slow start, whereas Bulge's response and follow-up question already feels defensive. The response itself is totally adequate, but the question feels reactionary rather than proactive. I think that scum will more likely feel the need to turn a question back on the asserter.In post 38, The Bulge wrote:cuz there was already a vote thereIn post 33, Vex Vience wrote:@anyone who voted yeet - mind explaining why you rvs voted yeet
i'd rather not have the game stall out in rvs, so i'm gonna get it started with this
why are you asking for reasons behind rvs votes and not for any serious votes?
The questions in 50 and 52 also did not... impress me? My reaction to the posts is very much "okay this sure is a question".
--
A question I do have for the bulge atm though is, if you think your wagon is a device for scum, why vote Mala, who was not involved with the wagon?
--
Other update is that I read STD as town more strongly than I did before. In the recent game we played together, where STD was scum, his approach to reading me was "sure, town I guess" and this is obviously very different, but also in a way where it feels like he is actually trying to work out my alignment instead of knowing it already.