Mini 666 - This Could Be Mafia - MOD ABANDONED

populartajo · Post Post #600 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:04 am

The above post doesnt make sense in 100 ways.
Muerro, are you going to keep ignoring me and all that has been posted in thread?

populartajo · Post Post #601 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:04 am

EBWOP
Fuck you new page. ROLF

Muerrto · Post Post #602 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:52 am

populartajo wrote:The above post doesnt make sense in 100 ways.

Sigh...did you want to explain this or just say it? Looking back on your posts I can already see the answer but just wondering...

populartajo · Post Post #603 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:56 am

Muerrto, do you really think Tony and me are scumpartners?

ShadowGirl · Post Post #604 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:24 am

Muerrto wrote:
ShadowGirl wrote:You're fine with potentially lynching a PR on day one?
A
potenial
watcher when nothing in his play has labelled him as town?

Yes.

But, yeah, I'd vote Tony if I had to. Those two are way too closely knit right now.

I did say potentially. :/

I prefer a Tony lynch today, but tommorow depending on the results I might be willing to lynch tajo.

populartajo wrote:Shadowgirl and everyone suspecting Tony, if you were scum and you could mislynch a player almost everyone suspects, would you unvote him and post that you have the exact same win condition in your PM?

Bleh, I don't like the 'if you were scum' question, but...

Yeah, as Batt said, lynching a power role day one would not look good. As well, if you get lynched and turn up town and he vouched for you as to have the same condition, that would make him look, don't you think?

populartajo · Post Post #605 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:37 am

Shadowgirl wrote:I prefer a Tony lynch today, but tommorow depending on the results I might be willing to lynch tajo.

Mmmm.

Shadowgirl wrote:Tony - 2
Muerrto - 4
Grimmy - 4
Fuzzy - 5
Ergo - 5
Batto - 6
Falcone - 7
PEG - 7
Competent - 7
Vivian - 8

Tajo - 9

Shadowgirl -

Mmmm. Why do you want to lynch me now?

Shadowgirl wrote:Yeah, as Batt said, lynching a power role day one would not look good. As well, if you get lynched and turn up town and he vouched for you as to have the same condition, that would make him look, don't you think?

How did he know that I posted the exact win condition?
.................
And Muerrto and PEG need to come up with the list almost all players have crafted. Please? Batto, who else is missing?

ShadowGirl · Post Post #606 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:42 am

I don't want to lynch you... Nine is way way from wanting to lynch you. o_o

Why wouldn't he think that was your win condition?

ShadowGirl · Post Post #607 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:43 am

Battousai wrote:
Ok, we got 4 candidates now with votes. How about we all list how likely we would vote the 4 and put them in order
(1 most likely, 10 least likely).
This way we can compare the list and hopefully come to a consensus, even if it's not on your top choice. You can add anyone else to the list if you want, but the top 4 have the best chance of being lynched.

You've been using the same system as me...

TonyMontana · Post Post #608 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:48 am

ShadowGirl wrote: I prefer a Tony lynch today, but tommorow depending on the results I might be willing to lynch tajo.

There's just zero rationality in this.
Explain how your view on tajo would change depending on my flip?

ShadowGirl · Post Post #609 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:56 am

TonyMontana wrote:
ShadowGirl wrote: I prefer a Tony lynch today, but tommorow depending on the results I might be willing to lynch tajo.
There's just zero rationality in this.
Explain how your view on tajo would change depending on my flip?

I meant results on his tracking, not the flip.

populartajo · Post Post #610 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:06 pm

ShadowGirl wrote:
TonyMontana wrote:
ShadowGirl wrote: I prefer a Tony lynch today, but tommorow depending on the results I might be willing to lynch tajo.
There's just zero rationality in this.
Explain how your view on tajo would change depending on my flip?
I meant results on his tracking, not the flip.

What results can indicate my alignment?

ShadowGirl · Post Post #611 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:13 pm

populartajo wrote:
ShadowGirl wrote:
TonyMontana wrote:
ShadowGirl wrote: I prefer a Tony lynch today, but tommorow depending on the results I might be willing to lynch tajo.
There's just zero rationality in this.
Explain how your view on tajo would change depending on my flip?
I meant results on his tracking, not the flip.
What results can indicate my alignment?

I don't see how this needs to be discussed now. And plus, there's quite a few variables to it.

populartajo · Post Post #612 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:19 pm

Lol, what?
Why do you want to lynch me if I have a 9? What extreme information can be gained of my night results to make you want to lynch me?

ShadowGirl · Post Post #613 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:05 pm

I already said I

don't

want to lynch at this time, partially because of your claim.

populartajo · Post Post #614 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:24 pm

Shadow, what do you think about my Muerrto's case?

populartajo · Post Post #615 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:25 pm

EBWOP
Considering he's second in your list.

ShadowGirl · Post Post #616 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:38 pm

Mainly because he's attacking because of your playstyle, at least from what I can recall. As you can see, he's tied for second and almost an on the fence vote.

Also, can you summarize your case on him since it's all over the place?

@Muerrto: Can you also summarize your case on Tajo?

I apologize, but you two just seem to have been going at it for pages and pages. :/

Muerrto · Post Post #617 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:46 am

My case on Tajo started with his reaction to my vote.

I voted him because he called for a prod when it wasn't needed. Trying to say people are lurking is a good way to build a wagon on them. Since I WASN'T lurking it was a BS prod.

When I voted him he FLIPPED out. One second he wasn't saying a word about me except that for some reason he had a problem with me agreeing about Time. What followed were pages of Tajo cursing everyone, never posting a defense other than 'I R TOWN, U R DUMB', claiming when there was no reason to, CLEARING Tony because he agreed with Tajo's 'win condition', more cursing, more 'Stop voting me, I'm town'. Etc.

Can his reaction be frustrated townie? At one point maybe, but not this far in. And the fact he's 100% sure I'm scum is suspect. Why? Because I suspect you? Because I didn't agree that knowing the win condition makes you town?

Wouldn't you assume since this is 'This could be mafia' that all win conditions are going to say 'could'? If you were scum, couldn't you just SWITCH the town/scum words and quote the win condition? Sorry, but you got a PM too as did Tony so him agreeing so quickly with you and you clearing him so completely makes me look really closely at both of you.

I could care less about a watcher. You have to target the actual mafia doing the kill(or a mafia with a power) to even be of use. I think your claim was early, unneccessary, and BS. I think you're scum and Tony's either stupid or your partner. I can't believe neither of you ever thought that mafia would ge getting the same 'could' win condition.

populartajo · Post Post #618 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:56 am

I could win when all threats to the mafia are eliminated? Really?
Really, Muerrto? Do you think thats the mafia win condition?
.............
I will answer everything about your post later. A bunch of lies. I expected more from you, really.

Muerrto · Post Post #619 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2008 8:03 am

populartajo wrote:I could win when all threats to the mafia are eliminated? Really?
Really, Muerrto? Do you think thats the mafia win condition?

Sounds about right. I wouldn't know =p

TonyMontana · Post Post #620 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2008 8:09 am

Muerrto wrote:Wouldn't you assume since this is 'This could be mafia' that all win conditions are going to say 'could'? If you were scum, couldn't you just SWITCH the town/scum words and quote the win condition?

I don't think anyone is concerned about the word "could", i think everyone knows that is in all the PMs.
And the idea that you could switch the words is ridiculous. But what do you know, right? You have no idea what the scum win condition would be, right?

Muerrto wrote:I could care less about a watcher. You have to target the actual mafia doing the kill(or a mafia with a power) to even be of use. I think your claim was early, unneccessary, and BS. I think you're scum and Tony's either stupid or your partner. I can't believe neither of you ever thought that mafia would ge getting the same 'could' win condition.

First of all, fail. A watcher sees who targets a person, you're thinking of a tracker.
Secondly, again you repeat the ridiculous notion that the word "could" is relevant.

You have already claimed that your win condition is the same, remember.

Muerrto · Post Post #621 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2008 8:35 am

My bad, was thinking tracker. Ok, so watcher's even worse, he has to target the ONE PERSON WHO DIES!

That gives him what odds? And how exactly do we determine whether he's legit?

And why did you feel the need to defend him?

TonyMontana · Post Post #622 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2008 9:14 am

I'm not defending him, I'm attacking you.

A watcher gets information on everyone who targets its target.

Is this what your case has come to, "who needs a watcher, anyway" ?

Muerrto · Post Post #623 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:50 am

No. I don't buy his claim. Others are saying well he's claimed PR. I'm saying umm he didn't claim cop or doc he claimed watcher. Even IF he's telling the truth it's no big loss and I STILL don't buy his claim.

ShadowGirl · Post Post #624 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:51 am

Tajo, did you ever give a name claim?