armlx wrote:
Can you give me a quick breakdown of that triangle? I am trying to get acclimated here
Skruffs went all Skruffs on everyone, Korts went all logical, and SC just waffled a lot was my breakdown of it.l
ACtually:
I attacked you,
Korts attacked me for defending you
SC had my back
Korts accused me and SC of being scum together, because he agreed with me, and voted me.
I pointed out that hte more logical thing to do would be to lynch SC sicne he was buddying up to me, which makes him more likely to be scum (Either buddying up to me or agreeing with his scum partner).
At the end of the day, he agreed, unvoted, voted SC, but then voted Netlava without really attacking SC for anything.
That's why I haven't been continually going after SC today, it's a foregone conclusion that he will turn up scum.
However, you avoided the entire situation today, and fortunately, BM, as either Town or Scum, very successfully wrecked my train of thought by trying to make the entire game about him. I'm house, and he's the sick guy jumping around the patient room screaming "Diagnose me! Diagnose me!"
Anyways, don't try to make it a triangle when it was pretty obviously a pentagram. I attacked you, Korts deflected attention from you onto SC and ME, SC aided and abetted. Today, I don't remember seeing you weigh in against SC at all.
Citizen Karne
: When someone asks that the hammer be postponed until someone (the lynched) speaks, it is incredibly bad form to hammer that person. It makes you look like you are trying to preemptively silence someone. You are making a judgement call that affects everyone else in the game by saying "I don't think we need to hear from SC again".