In post 726, scamper wrote:if you think it's "clearly ovservable", let's see, because you're being incredibly disingenuous right now
You are making the argument that I can't read the game.
Here is what an interacrion with you looks like.
Post X *exists
Post X says X. It gives (reasons)
Scamper " Post X means Y, and Y is wrong because (reasons)"
Me: Scamper, you got Post X wrong. (This is called A misrep or a strawman depending on context)
Scamper: "no i didn't"
Can you understand that this is incredibly frustrating.
You get people's stances objectively wrong. Not even analytically wrong. Often part of X states it as explicitly not Y. It's objectively not the same argument.
You take opinions noone has and throw them in the gutter and act like these were always the opinions of players. You put words in their mouth. Whether this is intentional to discredit them or an err on your part is irrelevant.
Before you reply, take some time and think about these 3 things.
1. Do you think that continuing this conversation will amount to information that will help you win the game?
2. Is it possible I may have made an error or too promptly attacked an idea without proper consideration?
3. Are you having a good time continuing this argument, or would you prefer to put your game efforts elsewhere?
I see the trend of this and I want to kill it before it grows toxic. FMPOV you are objectively wrong on your perspective of me and yourself. You won't be able to convince me otherwise. I don't think I can get my point through to you if you are town.
I'd prefer you give at least 20 minutes of consideration before deciding if you want to continue this. I don't. I don't think anyone else wants it to continue either.
Imprefection is the spice of life.
