Sobeahero wrote:
I never ignored the possibility you are a power role. I'm just not ignoring the possibility that you are Mafia either. You voted GC. Ever though maybe HE might be a power role? That seems like a very weak defense. :p
It's not a defence. I havent got anything to defend AGAINST. You put forward the scenario that i was lynched as town merely to gain information-neglecting to mention that i might not be Vanilla.
Notice, whilst i have voted GC, im not expecting him to be lynched just yet. Mafia on Day 1 is best played when the town jumps about alot, and keeps everyone on their toes.
Sobeahero wrote:
And I only acknowledge that if you are town and lynched, we waste a lynch on a town and learn nothing. But guess what? Same thing happens if GC is town. If he's lynched town, we learn nothing. Unless you can give me a reason why him flipping town yields any additional information, you're voting at the same risks I am. :p
Him flipping town will give additional info, just like me flipping town will. You then look at who put pressure on them. If he comes up town, we would think "would scum have attacked or defended him?" and attack accordingly. Same with me pretty much.
Btw, your point isnt that a vote for me is the same as a vote for GC-you need to back up why you chose me INSTEAD OF him.
Sobeahero wrote:
next, Scum aren't inherently going to lay dormant or be active, I just tend to notice in a few games Scum like to take out those with an opinion early on in the game.
seems a little unlikely here, given we have 2 month deadlines, and MS players are timid of lynching at the best of times.
Sobeahero wrote:
And on the Case of GC, its hard to tell how many people voted Hoopla because of him. But he both had an opinion, and people started voting hoopla after him, so its entirely possible Mafia would want him dead.
Only is Hoopla is scum. Pretty fundamental that! Scum dont mind keeping influential townies around who arent a direct threat to them.
Sobeahero wrote:
And I pick you over GC for this simple reason, you've been rather redundant with yoru reasonings why me voting for you is silly.
-We get no info if you flip town? We get no info if GC flips town either. We are both taking the same risk if we are both town, so its a silly argument.
-Saying you disagree with the sentamant that Scum would start instead of follow? They can do both, so thats not much of a point. :p
- The whole 'I could be a power role' line? Same goes for GC.
Lol, i sense a logical flaw here.
You voted for me, because WHEN YOU VOTED FOR ME, i didnt really defend myself. But why did you vote for me in the first place?
Sobeahero wrote:
In short, I vote for you for redundant and pointless defenses. :p
1. There was nothing to defend until after you voted me, hence your reasoning is nonsensical.
2. You have given me nothing to defend against-as you yourself have acknowledged.
BM