In post 8890, DeasVail wrote:Re: Dannflor I did have the thought that if I were solo scum here needing to survive to the end, I would be wanting to appear as pure and collaborative and pro-town as possible.
I mean, there is a reason I'm trying so hard right now and why I am currently pushing so hard for fire and it's actually exactly because I do not want to go to endgame
I am *dreading* this game going another phase. I am dreading winding up in a LyLo and having to defend myself as a deepwolf. I'm dreading the pressure of having to either figure out who the scum is and/or defend myself sufficiently. I am scared about this game.
And that's why I really can't relate to fire here and why I think he's scum. I don't sense any sort of like... urgency to solve the game. Like yeah, he pushed on DV when prompted but it's like, if I was in his position my first instinct would be like WAIT DON'T KILL ME I'M AT LEAST GONNA SOLVE THE GAME BEFORE I DIE
and he's like "I can try to solve the game I guess if you guys want but probably don't trust me"
I don't know maybe I'm too prideful or something and that's why I can't relate. But long story short I really want the game to end this phase and I currently feel very confident on fire. I don't know if that's actually helpful for anyone's paranoia of me but w/e
In post 8891, Thestatusquo wrote:I guess part of why I'm paranoid of Dann is that the way he approached frogster yesterday, he made really strong points about how frogsters posts felt super townie with how he and I were real timing and how he felt it was a proactive reason to town read frogster and then that kind of just went away when the frogster push started happening. The reason I don't know if that's a super strong reason to be suspicious is that obviously I was strongly convinced frogster was scum at the end of day yesterday too, so idk.
Yeah, idk
I probably should've stayed with my conviction. I kinda justified voting him at the end there by just how absolutely horrible reading the thread was. and like his behavior was awful. like I basically thought well I mean I could be wrong and even if he's town then at least the thread health is gonna be a lot better after this. but yeah I wish I had had more conviction before frogster blew up and I think that was a mistake on my part.
In post 8891, Thestatusquo wrote:But its not the first time this game where I've felt like dann was very fixated on a point where it supported a narrative that would be beneficial to him but it completely went away never to be mentioned again later. The best example of this was at the end of day with me forgetting CSFs claim he seemed very interested in saying I was scum based off of me forgetting that CSF had claimed but that hasn't seemed to play into his analysis of my slot at all now that less people seem interested in flipping me.
mmm I thought this was more of a funny point than anything else. Like I think it's interesting to consider and if it's true it would be absolutely hilarious. I was very caught up in the moment and excitement of CSF being scum and liked the idea of it being that simple. after reflecting it's like one small point and I really think against the volume of reasons to town read you it doesn't really hold much weight in my brain. also apparently you weren't the only one who treated CSF as not conf-town
I think the main thing is just that I've pretty much hard town read you since I came into the game and pretty rarely wavered. and I still feel pretty good about that