In post 921, Save The Dragons wrote:you realize my attack on nancy was partially a reaction test to see how she would react and she reacted in the way i expected town!nancy to react?
Yes, that penny dropped sometime in the last 30 minutes
(assuming you are town)
In post 921, Save The Dragons wrote:you realize my attack on nancy was partially a reaction test to see how she would react and she reacted in the way i expected town!nancy to react?
Yes, that penny dropped sometime in the last 30 minutes
(assuming you are town)
I feel like this has been a productive chat with you, STD, and
well
I kinda wanna townread you now
but I'm gonna sleep on it.
And while we're on the topic of sleep... thanks for coming to my AMA, it will soon be time for me to go to sleepy sleep. I go back to vomiting thoughts onto the thread once a day for the next three days now okk?
In post 915, Save The Dragons wrote:also like do you think town never defends themselves with shitty defenses?
I don't even scumread you. I just noticed an assumption
I don’t think it’s a relevant assumption unless you think both Nancy and ceph can be scum
I mean, two data points are better than one and one data point is worse than two, right?
In the world of scum!STD, scum!Nancy and town!ceph, STD is still being cheeky about on 50% of his argument.
vrej
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
Ok I didn't go to bed yet
I am wondering if Gamma might have been nitpicking furtive's point on purpose, I am more interested in Gamma than in furtive here.
But to accuse Gamma of nitpicking felt like nitpicking itself, so I wasn't sure how aggressively to challenge Gamma on that and ended up settling for a pretty softball wording of my point
Welcome to my brain @_@
I can't remember who it was that accused my posting of being self conscious, but duhhhh, I am probably a 100% on the neuroticism scale on all the personality tests
@furtive, no but I will make an effort just for you
Also for context the Pantry is the name of our PT
In post 906, Save The Dragons wrote:also pulling the "if i were scum card" but i'd definitely not attack random people i knew would get aggro at me (nancy) or upset with me (cephrir)
Both of these assume S/T relations
Its a fair shout though, Nancy is someone where if you push you will get pushback from her and honestly you could probably get a solid alignment read from that.
I also know it winds her up and then some so I suggest better, kinder routes.
In post 917, Aisa wrote:@STD To me, the fact I've found it hard to engage / have useful thoughts on your posting is proof that maybe you haven't been as attention getty as you claim. My theory is that if you are scum, your strategy is to check in once a day, make a couple posts, throw a little shade, then slink out before you attract too much attention.
Granted, maybe cephrir or Nancy would have a different take on how attention getty you have been.
I'm not pushing you now or anything, it's not like I volunteered this read on an attempt to get you eliminated. You mostly live in null land. I promise I'll take a closer look at you in the next couple days.
In post 906, Save The Dragons wrote:also pulling the "if i were scum card" but i'd definitely not attack random people i knew would get aggro at me (nancy) or upset with me (cephrir)
Now that I skimmed your ISO again, I see you dropped your suspicion of Nancy pretty quickly. I remember now, that was one of the things that felt sussy at the time.
One moment you were like "Hmm Nancy's tone is scummy" and 5 hours later you were like "nvm Nancy may be town now". Actually now that I think about it this might be town-indicative. But I don't think you get credit for attacking someone who defends herself fiercely, because it was a pretty tame and short lived attack.
I've had a better time reading StD than I have you, as evidenced by the fact I've had to come at you to get a read, and I'm sure you're red here.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}