i designed this setup in 2019 [game over]

[Prince of Paterson]

Prince, why are you town, aside from VCA?

A moderator gave me a role pm that says town on it.

[Prince of Paterson]

A PLAN: we flip NM, titus targets ranger, ranger targets quiet owl. if anyone is alive tomorrow we eliminate them. that might end the game.

Might be fine. I think Ranger is the most likely of the three. Not_Mafia probably does have to die, though. When looking back at day 2, it felt like Quiet Owl was a counterwagon to scum at times, but that's the main reason to townread them. It's possible that town was just running up multiple scum.

Titus, if you're guaranteed flipping tonight, can you confirm again now that your townflip locks imaginality as town? I don't want any ambiguity here.

[Not_Mafia]

if there's no neutral and it's a 6 player groupscum, then day 3 was all about reaching parity. they had to keep quiet owl alive and fastplayed with NM and mathblade outing themselves to get a kill. Bare in mind that mathblade's lycan vote was the most absurdly insane thing and it was 99% of the time coordinated with NM so they could get lycan killed. my theory is that NM's role would require someone to place a vote, and none of the players voted were good enough kills. lycan was a top townread and math's vote there was meant to activate NM's power.

NM's elimination today is not a matter of policy, unless of course the policy is killing scum

.

It is policy as much as you try to convince yourself otherwise

[Titus]

I disapprove of a Quiet Owl elimination.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

I disapprove of a Quiet Owl elimination.

You have a strong QO read?

[Lady Lambdadelta]

At work so I'm not sqapping accounts >.>

[imaginality]

@NM can you tell us more about how your hammer ability works? I think it could be important

@Ranger you said something about the neighbourhood thread basically proves you are town, not simply proves you non-mafia-but-could-be-third-party, is that correct?

[Gimli]

I will personally reject any and everything that happened in the neighborhood thread that could be scum theatre, in fact I'm scumreading ranger twice as hard just because she apparently had some interaction with mathblade during night.

neighborhood is serving just for scum to pocket and rolefish and do theatrics at night and all things bad.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

I will personally reject any and everything that happened in the neighborhood thread that could be scum theatre, in fact I'm scumreading ranger twice as hard just because she apparently had some interaction with mathblade during night.

neighborhood is serving just for scum to pocket and rolefish and do theatrics at night and all things bad.

I enjoy this person.

This is good posting. It coule be scum MOTIVATED good posting but it's good posting all the same.

[Prince of Paterson]

I disapprove of a Quiet Owl elimination.

Are you ignoring my question intentionally?

[imaginality]

Posting this for ease of reference:

Dead town roles:
Frogster - psychiatrist
Save the Dragons - encryptor neighbour
Morning Tweet - one-shot neapolitan neighbour
Cat Scratch Fever - even night tracker
biancospino - neighbour death innocent neighbour
GeorgeBailey - night 2 compulsive loyal weak vigilante
Elements - ???
Lycanfire - bus driver
HighPrincessErinys - even night doctor neigbour
UltimateGamer - backup innocent child

Dead scum roles:
kitten around - compulsive disloyal neighbour
McMenno - 1-shot cop immune godfather
Mathblade - fruit vendor neighbour
Enchant - multitasking gunsmith compulsive disloyal inventor

Claimed roles:
Titus - night 4 compulsive suicide bomber neighbour*
imaginality - night 5 rolecop neigbour*
Ranger - indecisive combined solo vigilante duet doctor [neighbour] (Ranger didn't state neigbour in the role title when claiming but obviously is in the neighbourhood)

Other:
Gimli - ?
KittyTacky - ?
Not_Mafia - ?
Quiet Owl - ?
Prince of Paterson - ?
Summon the Phoenix - ?

[Not_Mafia]

@NM can you tell us more about how your hammer ability works? I think it could be important

@Ranger you said something about the neighbourhood thread basically proves you are town, not simply proves you non-mafia-but-could-be-third-party, is that correct?

It was day 3 only, I could insta-hammer someone as long as my post had a picture of Miltank in and the word hammertime

[Prince of Paterson]

Not including Neighbor in the precise and detailed full claim while listing every other modifier and explaining them in detail may indicate that Ranger's claim was fake. It's an odd omission, and Ranger seems like the type to value completeness.

[Prince of Paterson]

Dropping one single modifier while copying and relaying the accurate role, when the rest of it came with links and descriptions, is a lot more unlikely than forgetting one while composing a fake role. In the former case she is transcribing the role directly from the source, and I don't see why that would result in forgetting one part of it when she was going to efforts to ensure the claim was in full.

[Summon The Phoenix]

We do have the word neighbour in our role name, I don't see why Ranger wouldn't.

-Summon

[Summon The Phoenix]

It's possible that she thought it wasn't important, but then again why underline each specific word in the role?

-Summon

[Titus]

Here's the plot hole I have. Given no one claimed to receive a gun, it's safe to infer scum shot every person who received a gun and all other shots, minus the vig, are the SK.

[Summon The Phoenix]

Here's the plot hole I have. Given no one claimed to receive a gun, it's safe to infer scum shot every person who received a gun and all other shots, minus the vig, are the SK.

Guns? I thought you were using 'gun' to refer to night targeting i.e. nightkills, but the phrase 'receive a gun' implies otherwise.

-Summon

[Prince of Paterson]

Due to the lack of clarification from Titus, if she continues to not confirm this, I will assume that imaginality is not confirmed town by her townflip tonight. Please clearly and definitively correct this if wrong. Now is not the time to be ambiguous if you're town.

[Prince of Paterson]

Here's the plot hole I have. Given no one claimed to receive a gun, it's safe to infer scum shot every person who received a gun and all other shots, minus the vig, are the SK.

Guns? I thought you were using 'gun' to refer to night targeting i.e. nightkills, but the phrase 'receive a gun' implies otherwise.

-Summon

Right. She's mentioned people "receiving a gun" several times. Does anyone know what she's talking about?

[Prince of Paterson]

I suppose it's time for me to full claim.

I am
1) a neighbor with imaginality
2) I know imaginality to be town
3) I am a night 4 suicide bomber
4) imaginality is a night five rolecop

Explain why you did not mention you were compulsive in your "full claim"?

[Quiet Owl]

my distinct impression was that the moment ranger was threatened by lycanfire, math and N_M immediately jumped on lycan to stop her from becoming a wagon. makes me think that whatever she is, she's crucial to scum winning.

purely based on that frigging weird behaviour, VOTE: Ranger

[Prince of Paterson]

Alright, I have an idea of what Titus may be talking about, but I want to hear her explanation first. Nobody else mentioned the subject of receiving guns, but she's talking about it like it's fact. I think there's a possibility that she knows more than she should. I'd prefer if nobody else share thoughts on the mechanical side of this subject until Titus does.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

my distinct impression was that the moment ranger was threatened by lycanfire, math and N_M immediately jumped on lycan to stop her from becoming a wagon. makes me think that whatever she is, she's crucial to scum winning.

purely based on that frigging weird behaviour, VOTE: Ranger

So we kill NM during day and have Titus suibomb Ranger at night.

[Prince of Paterson]

My opinion is that Quiet Owl's assessment of the hammer on lycanfire, being that it was in defense of Ranger, seems more likely than Ranger's assessment of the hammer on lycanfire, being that it was in defense of Quiet Owl.

Both are likely biased in their assessments, but Ranger's has more of an agenda of pushing one narrative while sweeping another under the rug.