Mini Theme 2290: Open ChatGPT - Game Over

[furtiveglance]

I think we're all waiting for some Titus content yeah

[Doctor Drew]

Like I am trying to not be a tunnelly asshole Titus but my patience is running thin

[imaginality]

KittyTacky agreeing with me is making me rethink a little.

Wrong account.
Like, did scum!Kitty see me townleaning scum! Titus and figure it might be safe for them to do the same?

- Nyx

There were only a couple of fluff interactions between them on D1 that I can see.
Would scum!Kitty in a {Morning Tweet, KittyTacky, Titus} scum team have pushed back on the GrandpaMo(redff) votes at the start of D2 though?

@Titus what's your read on Kitty?

[KittyTacky]

KittyTacky agreeing with me is making me rethink a little.

Wrong account.
Like, did scum!Kitty see me townleaning scum! Titus and figure it might be safe for them to do the same?

- Nyx

Orrrrr I'm just town and don't see a reason to scumread Titus.

Warming up to Porkens a bit rn.

[Not_Mafia]

VC 2.01

redFF (1)-

Menalque

KittyTacky (0)-

Dei Ex Machina (0)-

furtiveglance (0)-

Doctor Drew (0)-

Titus (4)-

imaginality, furtiveglance, Porkens, biancospino

-(E-2)

Porkens (2)-

Dei Ex Machina

Menalque (0)-

imaginalty (0)-

biancospino (0)-

Not Voting (4)-

GrandpaMo, KittyTacky, Doctor Drew, Titus

With

10

alive, it takes

6

to instantly eliminate.

Deadline is in

(expired on 2023-03-10 11:00:00)

- Mar 10th 11:00 GMT

Who's the second on Porkens?

This was an error

[furtiveglance]

A summary of people's views of MorningTweet (as detected by searching isos for "Morning", "Tweet", and "MT"), from most townlean to most scumlean:

Dei Ex Machina

- Nyx and Morta both townread MT in 175 and still townlean in 470
Titus - leans town in 670

Grandpa Mo

- no read expressed but did agree with a point MT made

KittyTacky

- no read expressed

biancospino

- no read expressed

Menalque

- no read expressed (

@Menalque

what was the question you were going to ask MT?)

imaginality

- neutral/mixed read in 240

Porkens

- mild suspicion in 203 but downplayed in 243

Defective Agency/furtiveglance

- mild suspicion in furtive's colour coded list 357 though wasn't in furtive's suspects in 185 (also the shift of Porkens, Menalque and Dei Ex Machina all going from the suspect pool in 185 to townread in 357 is interesting)

Doctor Drew

- aaaargh he has Morning Tweet in his signature!! Now I actually have to read through properly fml... okay, Doctor Drew was suspicious of MT in 184 and 234

Overall the main think I take from that is I feel better about Drew being town. The way he put his suspicions of MT seems genuine.

I think this is +town for imaginality.

[furtiveglance]

Spoiler: MT

UNVOTE:

the imagineality case by defective doesnt excite me. the 4 bullet point one, you know the one

Ppl suspect imagine but there's not much being laid out, anyone care to enlighten

morning I have a very important question for you when you get back here next but you have to promise not to be mad at me for asking you

Mmm what could it be

Spoiler: grandpa quote

UNVOTE:

the imagineality case by defective doesnt excite me. the 4 bullet point one, you know the one

Ppl suspect imagine but there's not much being laid out, anyone care to enlighten

morning I have a very important question for you when you get back here next but you have to promise not to be mad at me for asking you

Mmm what could it be

ding ding ding! you hit the hammer right on the nail. Why do you think I wasn't so straight forward on imagine? Bloodbot and Prokens were so adament on me checking the person who was on "e2" and take a look on them.

There is nothing being laid out.

Well I agree with you there. The imaginality wagon felt arbitrary

Spare me. My posts were a lightning rod that generated the majority of content in this game so far. You are just nipping at my heels as a pet wagon while ignoring the e-2 situation completely.

Hahahahaha i love this post

Spoiler: Mo on imagine

haha ok i see where the imaigne wagon came from it came from defective agency pushing a certain adgenda and bianco voting

doctor drew just "sheeped the hydras"

and then menalque ur the fourth vote, why? you also ask a question in 204 -- what is the implied presumption?

while reading thru the game, i did not like bloodbot at all. but their posting in 210,212,and vote on 213, makes ithard. however i do not like 212 reason. menaluqe could had just been asking to ask, i do this all the time to find someone else that i perceieve as town to have reassurance.

imaginality looks like they are omgussing in a sense?

@dei ex u become the 5th vote. and u vote them because voting Kt is doing nothing. ok lol . i feel like all ur reads have been sheeps so far. especially the vote on me rn

I'm moving this as voting KT isn't really doing anything in the immediate, I assume KT will play whenever they'll play and maybe then there'll be a bit more to discuss. Mind you, Janus said they thought Imaginality didn't look too different from the previous game they were in, where they were Town, so I may have to change this again in <24 hours, but hopefully it'll do for now!

like rlly? especially when u made this quote earlier

Kitty? Towny? He hasn't said anything new, his only reads were basically parroting thread consensus.
I need to look more into imaginality but for now I'm actually going to VOTE: KittyTacky.

nd u talk about me having this type of posting style LOL

Porkens response to accusations is scummy but I'm not gonna rehash what Titus said.

this from kitty seems to programmed imo

this puts porkens ( i think this is a 3rd party role), kitty, bloodbot, and dei in the bottom 4

with bloodbot being a definite scumlean

there has been nothing useful thru out this entire game funny enough which makes me think mafia is probably in the low post counts

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Bloodb0t

ill have my vote on u now

I like Grandpas analysis of the imagine wagon (and I agree to the point that imagine wasn't a slot that demanded attention, and moreso, was just being given that attention by some players who then tried to pressure everyone else into thinking the same way)

Also when Grrandpa is giving self meta 321 (not to bloodb0t, but to DEI), his reaction comes across genuine to me

I think this spews GrandpaMo and imaginality town.

[furtiveglance]

Town:
DEM, redFF, Dr Drew, imaginality, Porkens

That leaves:
[Titus, bianco, KT, Menalque]
as a POE.

[Dei Ex Machina]

I think we're all waiting for some Titus content yeah

Agreed.
My hydra partners may not agree but I'm comfortable taking Titus out of the limpool.
~Janus

[biancospino]

morning I have a very important question for you when you get back here next but you have to promise not to be mad at me for asking you

Mmm what could it be

Do you think this could have been theatre? It would be kind of weird. By the way, we never heard what the question would've been

[biancospino]

^ @furtive

[furtiveglance]

I think we're all waiting for some Titus content yeah

Agreed.
My hydra partners may not agree but I'm comfortable taking Titus out of the limpool.
~Janus

What, why?

[furtiveglance]

morning I have a very important question for you when you get back here next but you have to promise not to be mad at me for asking you

Mmm what could it be

Do you think this could have been theatre? It would be kind of weird. By the way, we never heard what the question would've been

I mean maybe - I'd categorise it as 'could be theatre', along with most interactions.

[biancospino]

Idk, my point is that it seems not to me. Otherwise I'd find weird that Mena dropped it unresolved

[furtiveglance]

Idk, my point is that it seems not to me. Otherwise I'd find weird that Mena dropped it unresolved

Don't agree at all

[Dei Ex Machina]

Possibly very dumb question, but
how common is it for an SK to signal to scum? I guess it could also be some other kind of strange third party like someone who has to get a specific person dead or eliminated. Just wondering if that's what GrandpaMo's posting yesterday could have meant, I still don't completely understand their motivations. I'm not sure why you would imply so strongly that someone is scum when they... aren't. I see a nonzero chance of this slot being a jester, though if it I guess Grandpa overestimated what seems like our willingness to yeet them today lol

I do agree otherwise the slot doesn't really seem to be scum motivated

-Morta

[Dei Ex Machina]

@Titus, when you get here, do you still scumread Porkens and if so, why?

-Morta

[Dei Ex Machina]

UNVOTE:

What it is you want me to

vote: Titus

?

I'm not convinced, but I'm going with the flow.[...]

Why?

[Dei Ex Machina]

UNVOTE: Porkens
I feel like if I squint maybe the contradiction is slightly scummy, but that isn't really enough to offset the rest of the posting, which seems towny to me. I'll have a think about where else we could vote.

@redFF, how is catching up on the game going?

-Morta

[Titus]

I'll be here later today

[KittyTacky]

Possibly very dumb question, but
how common is it for an SK to signal to scum? I guess it could also be some other kind of strange third party like someone who has to get a specific person dead or eliminated. Just wondering if that's what GrandpaMo's posting yesterday could have meant, I still don't completely understand their motivations. I'm not sure why you would imply so strongly that someone is scum when they... aren't. I see a nonzero chance of this slot being a jester, though if it I guess Grandpa overestimated what seems like our willingness to yeet them today lol

I do agree otherwise the slot doesn't really seem to be scum motivated

-Morta

Or yeah I forgot, executioner is a role ChatGPT knows about so it's conceivable that Grandpa could just be exe.

[KittyTacky]

Actually wait no it doesn't, it thinks exe is the same role as jest lol. I'll try <L-word>er.

[KittyTacky]

It doesn't know that one either. I think we can be reasonably sure there is no condemner/executioner. There could be a jester but I doubt it, I think it's just SK.

[KittyTacky]

I highly doubt it's some strange new role. ChatGPT is unimaginative when it comes to roles.

[KittyTacky]

Actually no it managed to tell me what a <lword>er was after one reset, but considering it took this much I still doubt it.