Man I literally asked the guy who said that they were struggling to try to form a read and here you are taking that out of context just to beat him down.In post 972, Gimli wrote:Spoiler: cephrir's casing meIn post 886, Cephrir wrote: welcome to cephy's FakeReads!
the game show where we post complete and utter bullshit (proving that i could fake some reads if i wanted to) and then see if I buy any of the bullshit I just made up (this is the "spin for scumhunting usage")
me presenting it in this fun way is scummy, but if i also write this meandering self-aware clause, it's not scummy anymore
i think this takes way more words to arrive at an obvious point than necessary, as if to make it look more like a thought processIn post 369, Gimli wrote:that just makes 6 the number people picked the most.In post 364, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:no that'sIn post 363, Gimli wrote: if anything aren't the 6s less likely to be scum cause no coordination? like scum wouldn't pile on the number 6
again scum don't know what numbers town pick
so if scum split into 3 different numbers the odds that one of those numbers hits a triple up is much higher than any townie hitting it, by 3:1. Coincidentally about the historical odds that groups of 3+ same number pickers contain at least 1 scum.
otoh the 6 is also the number that contains more townies, cause if scum splitted then its 2/3 or 3/3 town in it
while lets say a number that was only picked once has 0 or 1 scum and 0 or 1 town
you're just discovering 6 was the most picked number in the game and 'figuring out' its more likely to contain scum while forgetting its just the one with the most *PEOPLE* in it
given last time you were extremely loud like this about wanting to control things you were scum, and this is clearly not how to scumhunt, I'll go ahead and ignore it from this point forward since I just explained why I think its wrong
so, okay
any leans on anyone, LLD?
as bella proceeds to point out, the tone of this post is... like, from mars, comically pockety. hi, (user)! i like your thoughts because [reason 1] and [reason 2]. please do not vote me out, friend!In post 380, Gimli wrote:hi bella! I like this post cause it pushes what I'm sure you think is a protown agenda, while exposing reads you're probably making in the spot understanding the reasoning for it is weak and the threadstate isn't conducive to scumhunting.In post 373, Bellaphant wrote: The other issue is, if people are impressionable, like me, the only take away they are gonna have is that the 'reasonable' responses (me, imag, alissy, gimli) are town, and those aren't even particularly good takes!
an attempt to nail casual levityIn post 388, Gimli wrote:damn bellaIn post 386, Bellaphant wrote:Hi! Did AI write this post? It feels very expository but also like it's trying hard to be friendly! While being slightly passive aggressiveIn post 380, Gimli wrote:hi bella! I like this post cause it pushes what I'm sure you think is a protown agenda, while exposing reads you're probably making in the spot understanding the reasoning for it is weak and the threadstate isn't conducive to scumhunting.In post 373, Bellaphant wrote: The other issue is, if people are impressionable, like me, the only take away they are gonna have is that the 'reasonable' responses (me, imag, alissy, gimli) are town, and those aren't even particularly good takes!
well I haven't had my coffee yet
perhaps the worst part of this whole exchange wherein our hero, in a desperate effort to avoid sounding like an AI again, contorts himself into this word salad ass postIn post 398, Gimli wrote:I think that sentence came out a certain way that wasn't my intention, ofc I agree with your thoughts re:protown, but trying to act protown isn't towny per se, but its a suitable background on how you're giving no weight to your impressionable reads because you made those reads for real, which is the specific part I lean town onIn post 391, Bellaphant wrote: "what im sure you think is a protown agenda" is just so on the nose!
what is townie about "a more proper post"? is that just buddying?In post 403, Gimli wrote: tentatively townleaning on imaginality's entrance, it mirrors my thoughts on stuff while making a much more proper post than I could
I guess I like datisi's effort in reading the thing through. I won't, at least not for now
this post is crafted to sound town-excitedIn post 459, Gimli wrote: I can feel klick's townyness through bella its so glorious
marashu did not vote until after gimli voted for marashu - this is revisionistIn post 648, Gimli wrote:ashu the hardest ever since he voted you, cause I thought datisi's case in that page was pretty unconvincing, or at least I felt like datisi was noticing things that aren't indicative of alignment and calling them scummy. marashu didn't explain why he voted there but since dats' case was on the same page it makes sense for it to be sheeping him which I find suspicious cause IDT many townies would read through those points and agree with them. I don't like that marashu didn't return to the game yet while promising to do so, so I'm fine with where my vote is.
mith sees the point i made above and gimli here catches on to his mistake but the backpedal isn't that compelling. i disagree with the characterization that marashu was "sheeping" datisi's case by agreeing with a single line from it for one post.In post 715, Gimli wrote:he quoted the same post datisi used to SR Rad (thats 127 and 128, asking lld to calm down and move on) that's NAI or even a little towny from rad imo so I don't agree with how datisi read the situation. I don't scumread datisi for it cause maybe he believes in it, but for marashu to drop in the game and sheep what imo is not a good case, I didn't feel good about that. it feels like marashu just picked the first reasonable looking push in front of him and pushed that, so I voted him.In post 711, mith wrote:Gimli, why did you originally vote for Marashu?In post 648, Gimli wrote:I'm suspecting marashu the hardest ever since he voted you, cause I thought datisi's case in that page was pretty unconvincing, or at least I felt like datisi was noticing things that aren't indicative of alignment and calling them scummy. marashu didn't explain why he voted there but since dats' case was on the same page it makes sense for it to be sheeping him which I find suspicious cause IDT many townies would read through those points and agree with them. I don't like that marashu didn't return to the game yet while promising to do so, so I'm fine with where my vote is.
"i voted marashu for the movement he weas making towards rad with posts that came before mine" is again unfair - marashu had made only one post on the subject and it's hardly "movement towards" anythingIn post 750, Gimli wrote:I guess that's inconsistent in terms of what narrative I presented in the thread but I voted marashu for the movement he was making towards rad with posts that came before mine, obviously. after I voted he made another post with that vote, ignored that I voted him and stormed off, which strengthed my scumread. I didn't explain cause I haven't verbalized what I thought at that point, just thought marashu's push was kinda scummyIn post 728, mith wrote:I was trying to get a feel for why kuribo was suspecting Gimli, and one of the things mentioned was that vote. So I looked at the context here.In post 715, Gimli wrote:he quoted the same post datisi used to SR Rad (thats 127 and 128, asking lld to calm down and move on) that's NAI or even a little towny from rad imo so I don't agree with how datisi read the situation. I don't scumread datisi for it cause maybe he believes in it, but for marashu to drop in the game and sheep what imo is not a good case, I didn't feel good about that. it feels like marashu just picked the first reasonable looking push in front of him and pushed that, so I voted him.In post 711, mith wrote: Gimli, why did you originally vote for Marashu?
408 - Datisi votes for Rad (giving 127 as one reason, followed by some more stuff)
409-412 - Marashu enters the game. 411 is the post where Marashu gives 127, mirroring Datisi.
Otherwise, the spacing and sequence of quotes suggests that Marashu is legitimately catching up on the game at this point, and I assume this is null unless someone can point to some specific meta on this either way. I'm not sure I buy the idea that Marashu was quoting 127 solely because Datisi did, though.
413 - Gimli votes Marashu (with no explanation until 648)
414 - Marashu votes Rad
415 - Staeg enters the game, gives three scum reads (Datisi, Marashu, implosionality) votes Marashu. "Gimli has the right idea" is very strange here, given that Gimli has not at this point explained the vote in 413 and that two others (LLD and Alisae) are on the wagon at this point.
648, Gimli explains the scumread (in response to Rad) as "suspecting marashu the hardest ever since he voted on you" and that "marashu didn't explain why he voted there".
The gap between 413 and 648 coupled with the lack of consistency (Marashu's vote on Rad being after Gimli's vote) rubs me the wrong way.
Anyone more familiar with Gimli's play have any comment on this? (Or Staeg's 415, for that matter.)
I think this is a lot over one vote though
even the revised version is uncompelling
i guess scum might have posted more thought process here for town pointsIn post 762, Gimli wrote:update this to an actuall null read. I think his posts are correct enough but he hasn't shown anything alignment indicative thus farIn post 751, Gimli wrote: I don't have thoughts on staeg
so, do i buy any of the bullshit i just posted? actually, i do a little.
thanks for playing FakeReads!
this is bad, ceph, are you scum? I have never seen you do anything even close to such filler scumcase
so your first point, that I used more words than necessary, isn't true and I'm surprised you used it to push me. I used less words than everyone else that came after me and said what I said to LLD. I was breaking down the math for it in a dumb way cause I'm a dumb man, but how is it an excessive? also I don't think the thought process behind that post is alignment indicative, so how would it be something that 'looks like thought process' when it has to be literal thought process regardless of my rand? what are you suggesting, that I'm making up a thought process as to why a mechanical idea is wrong when that thought process is specifically NAI and something both town and scum could conclude exactly the same way with exactly the same reasoning?
well I don't appreaciate being called wordsalady either that made me sad but I understand my posts come off like that as well so whatever
re: imaginality's post. of course they're more proper posts than mine since mine are word salad. either way it was a post with clear ideas and easy to read which reflected my thoughts better than if I were to explain those same thoughts.
man.