(The knowledge between our play is public, there's an old game from a couple years ago that's the only game played on this account that isn't this one. In that game we were v clear about us playing together, so yea it's public)In post 121, Elements wrote:It is knowledge that is public, so it's not something special that's been brought up we couldn't have known otherwise.In post 117, OopsieDaisy wrote: That's fair, just in the absence of content that we have in the game right now I appreciate it. By saying this Towwl is showing he has specific knowledge on these players, and by committing to telling us what that knowledge is, he now has to stick by it. Mafia imo wouldn't show their cards as quickly.
Does saying that we know each other well and have played a lot of irl mafia together have the same effect? That's information about two players that the others problaby don't know, and also isn't available for them to find on the site. Therefore potentially showing more cards as it were
The fact that Hu Tao/CKD were heavily pushed and turned out to be town is public info, but his interpretations of the game aren't. Us having played together is an objective fact, but what Towwl took from that game could've been anything from "Hu Tao/CKD played super scummy in that game but happened to be town" to "Hu Tao/CKD were clearly town and yet everyone was hounding them??" to "I have no idea how to read these two someone help me".
I will say tho I just had another read of 64 and I seemed to have decided in my head what Towwl said was subjective when looking back now it *is* just the objective fact of "CKD and Hu Tao both had a lot of people scumreading them in large 243 and both were town".
@Towwl, did you think the scumreads of Hu Tao/CKD in that game were unwarranted, and do you feel your reading of that game has impacted how you're approaching them in this one?