[Planning] Mafiascum Site Championship Series
-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
[Planning] Mafiascum Site Championship Series
Hello Mafiascum!
Over the course of the last month or so we’ve been playing along and following 2023 Team Mafia. I don’t know about you, but I really enjoyed it and I felt like big site events like this are great for the community and super enjoyable to be a part of.
In addition to that I also got to thinking about other games and how they have tournament series which culminate a long period of time and events into one overall winner. One thing led to another and we’ve arrived at this idea: A tournament series for Mafiascum!
tout comprendre c'est tout pardonner-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
-
-
Black she/herTwilight Princessshe/her
- Twilight Princess
- Twilight Princess
- Posts: 13552
- Joined: January 27, 2023
- Pronoun: she/her
You've already heard a lot of my feedback but I want to ego this and reiterate that I'm completely in love with the idea! I'll leave the mech stuff to smarter people but I'm in full support here-
-
Ydrasse She*twirls hair*
-
-
Datisi he/him, it/itsDrawn from Memoryhe/him, it/its
- Drawn from Memory
- Drawn from Memory
- Posts: 26008
- Joined: March 28, 2019
- Pronoun: he/him, it/its
- Location: Croatia
egoI will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”~M-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
Ya actually what i did was tunnel into ydras mind and steal all the words that were there and write them down.
tout comprendre c'est tout pardonner-
-
T-Bone He/HimA Cut AboveHe/Him
- A Cut Above
- A Cut Above
- Posts: 9133
- Joined: February 18, 2011
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Shrug City
Eggo-
-
schadd_ he/itpandora's pukeboxhe/it
- pandora's pukebox
- pandora's pukebox
- Posts: 7928
- Joined: December 28, 2016
- Pronoun: he/it
- Location: mountain bathroom
sure i'll plan to mod some for this-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
I recommend the setup I ran for this game if ur looking for open suggestions. I also really liked PYP while playing it in TM-
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the HaystackShe
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15155
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
-
-
Alisae lolbalance
- lolbalance
- lolbalance
- Posts: 47098
- Joined: October 31, 2016
- Location: Cali~ (PST)
Ythan wins MSCS-
-
Lady Lambdadelta She/FaerRise of the PhoenixShe/Faer
- Rise of the Phoenix
- Rise of the Phoenix
- Posts: 25201
- Joined: August 31, 2010
- Pronoun: She/Faer
- Location: formerly in a Rage
Ego, and happily helped in this <3Yes my Lord, but questions are dangerous, for they have answers.
13 heads and counting now, plurality is adaptive. If our experience might help you,click here.
If you wish tospeak to one of us, we are Niamh, Rhiannon, Rhea, Aisling, Saoirse, Selene, Aoife, Fírinne, Aurélie, Lyra, Airna, Fiadh and Laoise.
Soar on wings of retribution and set the world ablaze-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
I have created a server for people who are interested in modding games for the event.
Please keep in mind this server only exists for coordination and scheduling, it is not for discussing or reviewing games.
If you're interested at all in modding games during this event please join and if you know approximately when you'd like to mod let us know so we can throw you in a slot.
Heretout comprendre c'est tout pardonner-
-
Umlaut Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6053
- Joined: August 3, 2016
- Location: Somewhere out there
Ergo“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,and the other kind,’ and those whodon’tsay. Well, then there’s me.” — J.R. “Bob” Dobbs-
-
Aisa she/her, they/themMafia Scumshe/her, they/them
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2838
- Joined: December 19, 2013
- Pronoun: she/her, they/them
- Location: Europe
I think I personally find the idea of a cash prize this high a little... strange? awkward?
I don't know that there's an actual logical reason for this but I'll try to explain why I would find the ~ vibes ~ tricky to navigate.
Spoiler: Aisa's feelings
I want to emphasise I don't know what's right or wrong. I'm... sharing how I feel to start a conversation. Others may feel differently in which case I encourage them to share their thoughts. In particular can see people thinking $100 is appropriate for an event of this size / length.-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
Your feelings are valid and i appreciate you sharing them.In post 14, Aisa wrote: I think I personally find the idea of a cash prize this high a little... strange? awkward?
I don't know that there's an actual logical reason for this but I'll try to explain why I would find the ~ vibes ~ tricky to navigate.
Spoiler: Aisa's feelings
I want to emphasise I don't know what's right or wrong. I'm... sharing how I feel to start a conversation. Others may feel differently in which case I encourage them to share their thoughts. In particular can see people thinking $100 is appropriate for an event of this size / length.
From my end i think that 100 dollars is definitely of an appropriate level for the amount of time and effort that a person will have put into this event in order to win it over the course of a whole year and i promise you that the amount of money is not an amount that it matters for me to spend in this way or i wouldn't want to do it.
If it makes you feel better in terms of playing for it you can either a) opt out of prizes. In this case i will pass down the prizes you would have won to the person below you and move everything else down one slot. Or b) i am happy to make a donation in your name to the charity of your choice instead of the prize going directly to you.tout comprendre c'est tout pardonner-
-
imaginality he/theyRestricted Towniehe/they
- Restricted Townie
- Restricted Townie
- Posts: 3377
- Joined: May 29, 2008
- Pronoun: he/they
- Location: Christchurch, NZ
1. Feedback on the scoring
- seems pretty workable
2. Feedback on the structure
- is it total points scored or average points per game?
- the top 7 games cut-off might be too high, especially if the scoring is total points, depending on levels of interest - for example if say 25 people are interested and game size is average 13 then most players won't get to play 7 games which makes it fairly moot. Maybe top 5 games?
-also, if there's a lot of interest in this then maybe each game after the first should allow an extra couple of days of signups and then if it ends up oversubscribed, people who didn't play the previous game get preference? E.g. if a 13p game gets 16 ins but the last three ins are from players who didn't play the previous game, then the finalised player list is players 1-10 and 14-16.
5. Are you interested? Is this something you would like to play in?
- Yep!
6. Do people think this strikes the right balance between rewarding people who go all out but letting people have time to not play mafia and live their lives/Still be competitive without having to grind out every single game?
- As mentioned if it's total points then top 7 games seems a bit high"holy shit this entire time i thought imaginalitys profile was a purple seahorse" - camelCasedSnivy-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
Yeah it's hard to come up with a number that makes sense. I was thinking of upping the number of games to 15 and doing top 7 games with a max number of games you're allowed to play of 10 maybe?In post 16, imaginality wrote: 1. Feedback on the scoring
- seems pretty workable
2. Feedback on the structure
- is it total points scored or average points per game?
- the top 7 games cut-off might be too high, especially if the scoring is total points, depending on levels of interest - for example if say 25 people are interested and game size is average 13 then most players won't get to play 7 games which makes it fairly moot. Maybe top 5 games?
-also, if there's a lot of interest in this then maybe each game after the first should allow an extra couple of days of signups and then if it ends up oversubscribed, people who didn't play the previous game get preference? E.g. if a 13p game gets 16 ins but the last three ins are from players who didn't play the previous game, then the finalised player list is players 1-10 and 14-16.
5. Are you interested? Is this something you would like to play in?
- Yep!
6. Do people think this strikes the right balance between rewarding people who go all out but letting people have time to not play mafia and live their lives/Still be competitive without having to grind out every single game?
- As mentioned if it's total points then top 7 games seems a bit high
Don't want to end up with a tie. Though i do need to come up with a tie break system regardless.tout comprendre c'est tout pardonner-
-
fireisredsir Goodfellas/Rising Star
- Goodfellas/Rising Star
- Goodfellas/Rising Star
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: January 25, 2022
i think the idea sounds cool and well thought out and i think it should happen
i agree that demand for playing might make things tricky if more people want to play than there are slots. maybe an early gauge of how many would want to participate might help guide things, and/or a lower priority in sign-ups given to people who have reached the minimum, as suggested
i also was really excited to play and then noticed the money thing. i don't really think i have a solution for that. but also expressing i guess some feelings of weirdness around that and i wouldn't really know how to handle the situation and might rather just not play. i don't really think you should change anything either though since it probably adds to the fun/excitement for most people and it is a generous offer to the community-
-
fireisredsir Goodfellas/Rising Star
- Goodfellas/Rising Star
- Goodfellas/Rising Star
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: January 25, 2022
the scoring system might affect how people play
specifically, incentive for being on a correct elim (and no negative for being on a wrong one) may make people more likely to want to be on the wagon of whoever is being limmed
i don't really think this is the end of the world? but it probably changes the shape of games at least a little bit-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
Yeah we are definitely aware that there are incentives created by the scoring system.
We think that this is pretty unavoidable. Almost any point system you come up with is going to give incentives for certain behaviors such that it probably changes how people play a bit.
We've tried to mitigate that by 1) fundamentally only rewarding things that are fundamentals of winning a mafia game and 2) making the highest incentive being winning the game.
This means that while it is strictly speaking better to be on a wagon than off it if the wagon is inevitable, that consideration does not override the consideration that if you're wrong on the wagon you're more likely to lose the game and therefore not going to score that well.
I thought about the possibility of negative points but i think it ultimately ends up just incentivising different stuff rather than fixing the problem.
My expectation is that this scoring system will change people's behavior a little bit at the margins but that it shouldn't be correct for people to change their behavior drastically because of ittout comprendre c'est tout pardonner-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
In post 18, fireisredsir wrote: i think the idea sounds cool and well thought out and i think it should happen
i agree that demand for playing might make things tricky if more people want to play than there are slots. maybe an early gauge of how many would want to participate might help guide things, and/or a lower priority in sign-ups given to people who have reached the minimum, as suggested
i also was really excited to play and then noticed the money thing. i don't really think i have a solution for that. but also expressing i guess some feelings of weirdness around that and i wouldn't really know how to handle the situation and might rather just not play. i don't really think you should change anything either though since it probably adds to the fun/excitement for most people and it is a generous offer to the community
Also
I don't know if you saw this or not, not sure if it helps you re:that.In post 15, Thestatusquo wrote:
Your feelings are valid and i appreciate you sharing them.In post 14, Aisa wrote: I think I personally find the idea of a cash prize this high a little... strange? awkward?
I don't know that there's an actual logical reason for this but I'll try to explain why I would find the ~ vibes ~ tricky to navigate.
Spoiler: Aisa's feelings
I want to emphasise I don't know what's right or wrong. I'm... sharing how I feel to start a conversation. Others may feel differently in which case I encourage them to share their thoughts. In particular can see people thinking $100 is appropriate for an event of this size / length.
From my end i think that 100 dollars is definitely of an appropriate level for the amount of time and effort that a person will have put into this event in order to win it over the course of a whole year and i promise you that the amount of money is not an amount that it matters for me to spend in this way or i wouldn't want to do it.
If it makes you feel better in terms of playing for it you can either a) opt out of prizes. In this case i will pass down the prizes you would have won to the person below you and move everything else down one slot. Or b) i am happy to make a donation in your name to the charity of your choice instead of the prize going directly to you.tout comprendre c'est tout pardonner-
-
schadd_ he/itpandora's pukeboxhe/it
- pandora's pukebox
- pandora's pukebox
- Posts: 7928
- Joined: December 28, 2016
- Pronoun: he/it
- Location: mountain bathroom
some thoughts
- it's probably not lost on you that one game/month is wildly optimistic. my 17p francisco lindor game opened for signups feb 3rd, filled mar 20, started mar 21, and finished may 19 (with 7 players surviving !!!). the micro from team mafia took a month and two weeks to finish. realistically you can take action to tighten these numbers as a mod: shortening deadlines, having backup moderation (and like setting gcal notifications and whatever lol) so that you get phases done closer to exactly when they're supposed to, et cetera. maybe the games fill faster, especially if there's this wad of money hanging over them, though i wouldn't count on it (my game also filled kind of phenomenally slowly in any case). i also think that signups for the next game should be open after the previous game goes down to 5 players or less, unless it seems reliable that signups for this happen faster than a week.
somehow when i first read this i thought that the 5 best games counted instead of 7, which i actually think is preferable (in conjunction with keeping 12 games instead of 15). in particular, i think that this event works better if we aim to see it finishing sooner rather than laterㅡpeople leave the site and/or stop wanting to play, and the whole thing operates on the confidence of the players that "eh, i can stick with this thing for that long." the number 12 is conceptually glued to the idea that it would last a year (even if that literally could not happen ever on gods green earth) and i guess my instinct is that its just a better number. i imagine the thing really grinding to get done with 15 games.
- was about to type out something to the effect of "i think anonymous games are slow to fill but i haven't paid attention to any of them" and was aghast to find out that 13p anonymous mini themes seem to fill in about a week. still, i think it should be made easy for players to log ngames played without having to play an alt game, because i imagine that some percentage of people just have no interest in them at all. there was a while where i didn't notice the alt game clause in the OP & i had a concern about the last few games, that people could openly complain about how people play when there is very cut and dry money on the line, which IMO necessitates like 2 or 3 or maybe 0 alt games, especially since perverse incentives in general will happen in every game regardless. i'm speculating blindly about how much of a chore they are for people so i would propose making a poll about this.
- i spent a lot of time thinking about point values. in short, my suggestions are: get rid of scoring for vig shot, all NKs other than 1 point for N1/N2, scum surviving at endgame; add 1 point for winning the game as either alignment; limit players to 10 games played out of 15 (or 7 or 8 out of 12), which can maybe be amended to "only the first ngames count" if games struggle to fill. i'm just gonna click post now and plan to defend these later
-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
appreciate the feedback. I strongly disagree with some of it, but I'm still digesting.tout comprendre c'est tout pardonner-
-
Thestatusquo He/HimSheaHe/Him
- Shea
- Shea
- Posts: 14372
- Joined: July 27, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Chicago!
mmm, let me just go through it in order while I am thinking about it.
1) Yes, its not lost on me. I think the original cadence I posted in this thread is bad and probably shouldn't be the actual cadence. It's probably correct to open signups for the next game while the current game is ongoing. I am a little unsure about when the best time to do this is exactly, but we probably shouldn't wait for a game to end to start the next one. Most of the players in the current game will be dead by the time the game is in late game (somewhere between day 3 and day 5?) and probably thats when we should open signups. Endgames aren't usually the most post intensive also so its not like people still alive in that game would be particularly constrained from joining a new one.
2) I think that the problem with 5 games (and really 6 to I think.) is that it ends up being way too likely that the tournament ends in a tie. I will be implementing a tiebreaker system just in case anyway, but I would really really really prefer to not use it. One of the things that I think really sucks about team mafia is that it invariably comes down to some sort of tie breaker scenario where you're trying to differentiate between a bunch of teams with the same score who objectively are all kind of similar. Given the structure of that event there isn't really a fix I think, but I think the fix here is that by making it a larger number we allow for more granularity and thus less chance of not having a winner using the scoring system. I understand that its going to be a bit of a trek, but its kind of intended to be that way. I think part of the beauty of doing the system the way I think I will eventually decide to do it (15 games, 7 scores count, and I had decided on a max of ten games already I think per player) is that you don't HAVE to engage with the whole event to have a good chance to win, you just have to engage with a little less than half of it. That means we don't have to have the whole players playing the event the whole time. We can have people coming in and out of it, or maybe someone learns about it halfway through and is like oh thats cool and plays the last 7 events. This structure I think makes it LESS of a grind for the players than it otherwise would be. By making the number of games smaller you definitionally increase the percentage of the event of the game that players have to engage with, and given that the way we are adding games is by running games simultaneously at the beginning and end of the event, that gives the players a lot of options for how to engage with the system on their own terms.
3) I don't love the idea of anonymous games but I think they're an unfortunate necessity. I think the incentives of the tournament outweigh the incentives of the game play too clearly when people know exactly who they need to beat and by what amount such that the game stops being a mafia game for a lot of people and starts being about how do I stop x from getting more points than me. I think the anonymous nature of the latter part of the tournament serves that purpose and also serves the purpose of people not knowing exactly where they stand/where others stand such that it makes the reveal of the winner more interesting.
I think this is another argument for more games though, by the way. One thing I didn't like about the original number was I was talking to HPE in the discord and it mentioned that playing anon games would be hard for it because of the distinctive pronouns it uses, which made me think about how, while yes you can technically fit in all your games without ever having to play an anon game, that means that you are forced to play almost every single other game in the event, which really limits player agency. My thought was that adding more games allowed players to have more choices with regards to this.
I also think that increasing the number of games just increases the number of players who get a chance to play which I think is kind of important. Less games just means less space for people to play who want to.
My reaction to most of your suggestions about scoring is kind of a "but why?" so I'll wait to hear your rationale for it before responding.tout comprendre c'est tout pardonner
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.