springlullaby wrote:Lol, I hadn't realized the wagon on me sprung so fast. I think you guy who are voting me are pretty crap, when someone tell you to leave them alone, you do. I also wonder that you guys are prefering me over K7, you will have to explain that choice also.
The reason i voted for you was because you were breadcrumbing an investigative role to the point where you'd obviously be NKed, and i wanted us to get the information out in the open.
SL wrote:
For the record, 2150 and 2153 by BM are very scummy.
Oh My God! At least i dont SUCK!
SL wrote:
I've actually debated with claiming or not during the whole day, and clearly I can't be bothered with the day game so maybe this will pump up a little energy into the game.
Ya, i'd noticed. That's why you looked so damn obvious and i had to know for sure whether you were BSing or being honest.
SL wrote:
I'm a swiss watcher, I half-heartedly breadcrumbed in my fist post this game: omega in slanton's name for Omega, the swiss watch label.
who the hell knows this?? lol
SL wrote:
Result:
Night 1. Slanton didn't sent any action in.
Night 2. I'm not revealing at the moment.
Night 3. I targetted Skruffs, two people visited him - I think it is very likely that one is scum. I'm revealing one name for now.
-----------------
So, BM, your turn to claim and explain why you visited Skruffs last night.
I think revealing me first was rather silly, given you've already breadcrumed the other name fairly obviously.
That said, i can at least confirm your role. I did target Skruffs last night. And it should be fairly obvious from the fact HE'S NOT DEAD that i'm not scum!
lol
I think you should reveal your Night 2 choice before the day is over. But if you want to do so in your own way, that's fine.
BM